On Tuesday, 15 September 2015 at 20:54:49 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Tuesday 15 September 2015 22:09, Prudence wrote:
The code below doesn't work.
Please be more specific in how it doesn't work. Mention the
error message if there is one, or say how the code behaves
differently from what
How does one initialize a tuple type and are arrays initialized
by default?
The code below doesn't work. I recently converted to use a tuple
and that seemed to have broke it and I don't know why, when I
changed the New function to use a ref, that made it worse cause
now the array is all
I created the following code that some of you have already seen.
It's sort of a multiple value AA array with self tracking.
The problem is, that for some type values, such as delegates, the
comparison is is identical. (basically when the delegate is the
same)
To solve that problem, I'd like
On Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 16:58:22 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 15:35:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
the GC heavily. And the reality of the matter is that the vast
majority of programs will have _no_ problems with using the GC
so long as they don't use
On Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 17:16:02 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 17:00:30 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 16:53:20 UTC, ponce wrote:
GC is basically ok for anything soft-realtime, where you
already spend a lot of time to go fast enough.
On Saturday, 12 September 2015 at 17:11:04 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Saturday 12 September 2015 16:30, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Reduced:
[...]
Error: type SingleStore is not an expression
Reduced further:
class MyStore
{
class SingleStore
{
static void New() // Removing
On Saturday, 12 September 2015 at 14:30:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 09/12/2015 06:37 AM, Prudence wrote:
Says the creating new SingleStore is not an expression
Reduced:
mixin template ObjectStore(TKey)
{
class SingleStore
{
static void New()// Removing 'static'
It would seem to be the logical thing to do?
That is, suppose two threads are sharing a resource. Thread A has
it locked. B is "waiting". Is B in a loop burning cycles running
in the background(regardless of thread.sleep, which only
alleviates the problem) or does it yield completely and
On Saturday, 12 September 2015 at 06:23:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, September 11, 2015 23:29:05 Laeeth Isharc via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 21:58:28 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
> [...]
Seems to be quite a lot of FUD wrt use of standard library and
The following code simply does not work, it might be buggy now
after fiddling with it but basically remove and the
SingleStore.New are not working(Says the creating new SingleStore
is not an expression, which makes no sense to me).
Essentially I'm creating a mixin template so I can have
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 16:04:22 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 14:54:00 UTC, Prudence wrote:
But in this case it is static, so why does it matter? Do you
have any ideas how to wrap it or fix this?
It matters exactly because it is static. A code written for
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 19:27:49 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 17:29:47 UTC, Prudence wrote:
I don't care about "maybe" working. Since the array is hidden
inside a class I can control who and how it is used and deal
with the race conditions.
You could use
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 20:30:37 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 20:06:53 UTC, Prudence wrote:
Can you back up this claim? Not saying your lying, I'd just
like to know it's true for a fact?
The list of things that trigger the GC is pretty short. See the
Error: template std.algorithm.mutation.remove cannot deduce
function from argument types !()(bool delegate(void*, uint, uint,
int)[], void), candidates are:
std.algorithm.mutation.remove(SwapStrategy s =
SwapStrategy.stable, Range, Offset...)(Range range, Offset
offset) if (s !=
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 13:12:14 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 04:28:52 UTC, Prudence wrote:
I thought about that but then I have to rely on the GC for
some simple things. Doesn't seem like the right way to go.
Since it is static, it will never be collected
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 07:41:10 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
I get only one error:
Error: non-shared method std.container.array.Array!(void
delegate()).Array.~this is not callable using a shared object.
It will try to destruct the array on program termination, but
it requires the destructor
Is there a flag for knowing when a project is compiling for
windows(Uses WinMain) vs a console(normal main)?
version(Windows) is always valid for a console app, so it is
useless to disambiguate between a console app and a windows app.
(Say I have both a main and a winmain in my code, I need
I can't create a shared array:
static Array!(bool delegate(int, WPARAM, LPARAM)) callbacks;
(prepending shared produce a ton of errors with the Array class)
I've tried making it a pointer and other things.
The array must be static and must be shared. Without shared
everything works but I
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 01:36:31 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 10 September 2015 at 18:10:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
BTW it is pretty rare that you should actually write a WinMain
in D. The right thing to do in most cases is to write a normal
main function. You can still get
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 00:50:15 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 00:48:28 UTC, Prudence wrote:
static Array!(bool delegate(int, WPARAM, LPARAM)) callbacks;
Try just using a regular array instead of the library Array.
static bool delegate(int, WPARAM,
I can't seem to receive certain messages, my code is very simple
and it all works except for receiving:
in one thread I do
locate("MyMonitor").send(cast(shared)pt);
which sends the message(pt is a windows POINT structure).
In the MyMonitor spawned thread, I have
while
I have
hook = SetWindowsHookEx(WH_MOUSE, , NULL, ThreadID);
Proc is the standard hook proc:
public extern (Windows) LRESULT Proc(int code, WPARAM wParam,
LPARAM lParam)
I get a type mismatch because Proc is a delegate and
SetWindowsHookEx expects a function. Making proc static works but
On that note, is there also any generic translation software for
code that you can program a set of simple "rules"(matching and
arranging) to translate source code?
e.g., match("const WM_", ";")->WM.add(%1 + ",")).
The above should be obvious but essentially it matches the first
string until
Windows headers contain a ton of global const's for the various
messages. Seems like a very bad way to go about this.
Could one not simply put all these in an enum? e.g., enum WM {
WM_CREATE = 1, etc... }?
If so, because there are so many and so many references to them,
this can't be done
On Monday, 7 September 2015 at 20:55:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2015 at 19:06:48 UTC, Prudence wrote:
It's called encapsulation. It prevents namespace pollution and
identifier collision.
This is already provided by the D module system. Even if you
were to define a
On Monday, 7 September 2015 at 22:21:28 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2015 at 22:02:47 UTC, Prudence wrote:
Oh, and who says you couldn't keep both systems?
Nobody. There's absolutely nothing stopping you from defining
your one constants and bindings. I think you should
On Monday, 7 September 2015 at 17:59:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2015 at 17:44:54 UTC, Prudence wrote:
const WM_* -> add to enum WM;
else WM_* -> WM.*
I'm against that. The documentation all says WM_* and we
shouldn't muck with it.
huh?
Are you saying you don't
On Monday, 7 September 2015 at 18:58:08 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2015 at 18:42:59 UTC, Prudence wrote:
because it is confusing and hard for you to understand over
Nope, I'm saying it is a pointless change. If you do that,
EVERY time you want to look something up, you
On Sunday, 6 September 2015 at 18:11:44 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Well, you can have an array of event factories:
IEvent function()[2] factories = [ factory1, factory2 ];
IEvent factory1() { return new Event1(); }
IEvent factory2() { return new Event2(); }
Then use enum for indexing:
IEvent e =
On Sunday, 6 September 2015 at 10:28:59 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Sunday, 6 September 2015 at 02:37:21 UTC, Prudence wrote:
Obviously the issue is that I'm not using any resources yet it
is giving me such an error.
You do. See docs for lpszMenuName field. GUI projects generated
by Visual Studio
I have code setup in such a way that I call a user defined
function, e.g.,
void myFunc(Data d)
{
}
myFunc has to be passed to the main code using something like
void SetFunc(void function(Data) func) { ... func(myData); }
What I would like to do is, instead of having to pass data to
I'm trying to create a win32 window. I coped the code pretty much
directly from msdn:
MSG msg;
BOOL bRet;
WNDCLASS wc;
// Register the window class for the main window.
if (!hPrevInstance)
{
On Sunday, 6 September 2015 at 00:29:13 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 5 September 2015 at 19:06:15 UTC, Prudence wrote:
That's about as far as I can get. (what resource data? Where I
do put it? How, who, when?)
Resource data in Windows is data compiled into your exe. It is
stuff
Standard and Win32 apps are so old school!
I'd like to hide WinMain by wrapping it in an application
class(more or less).
Essentially I have an Application class
class Application
{
public static Application New(void delegate() entry)
{
}
}
Another module
extern (Windows)
On Saturday, 5 September 2015 at 01:49:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Saturday, 5 September 2015 at 01:43:43 UTC, Prudence wrote:
extern (Windows) int WinMain(...)
If you use WinMain in D, you'll also have to initialize the D
runtime yourself, which will call static constructors and such.
If I use functions instead of delegates it works.
I suppose the problem then is that the delegate can't create a
fat pointer when used in a static context. (i.e., why the
functions work)
The question is, then, Can I construct a delegate manually and
supply my own context pointer?
e.g.,
36 matches
Mail list logo
