On Sunday, 26 December 2021 at 15:36:54 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Sunday, 26 December 2021 at 15:20:09 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo
wrote:
So if you use `workerLocalStorage` ... you'll get your output
in order without sorting.
Scratch that, I misunderstood the example. It doesn't solve
ordering.
On Sunday, 26 December 2021 at 15:20:09 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
So if you use `workerLocalStorage` to give each thread an
`appender!string` to write output to, and afterwards write
those to `stdout`, you'll get your output in order without
sorting.
Scratch that, I misunderstood the
On Sunday, 26 December 2021 at 11:24:54 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
I would start by removing the use of stdout in your loop kernel
- I'm not familiar with what you are calculating, but if you
can basically have the (parallel) loop operate from (say) one
array directly into another then you
On Sunday, 26 December 2021 at 06:10:03 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
[...]
```d
foreach(value; taskPool.parallel(range) ){code}
```
[...]
Now said results are out of order
[...]
So I suppose, is there anything I need to know? About shared
resources or how to wait until all threads are
On 27/12/2021 12:10 AM, max haughton wrote:
I would start by removing the use of stdout in your loop kernel - I'm
not familiar with what you are calculating, but if you can basically
have the (parallel) loop operate from (say) one array directly into
another then you can get extremely good
On Sunday, 26 December 2021 at 06:10:03 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
This is curious. I was up for trying to parallelize my code,
specifically having a block of code calculate some polynomials
(*Related to Reed Solomon stuff*). So I cracked open
std.parallel and looked over how I would manage
This is curious. I was up for trying to parallelize my code,
specifically having a block of code calculate some polynomials
(*Related to Reed Solomon stuff*). So I cracked open std.parallel
and looked over how I would manage this all.
To my surprise I found ParallelForEach, which gives the
