On Friday, 25 February 2022 at 19:06:25 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 2/25/22 08:24, Paul Backus wrote:
> I've seen `.stringof` give inconsistent results. (E.g.,
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18269)
That must be a part of the reasons why Adam D Ruppe repeats
that .stringof should
On 2/25/22 08:24, Paul Backus wrote:
> I've seen `.stringof` give inconsistent results. (E.g.,
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18269)
That must be a part of the reasons why Adam D Ruppe repeats that
.stringof should not be used for such programmatic purposes e.g. if I
remember
On Friday, 25 February 2022 at 16:24:46 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Friday, 25 February 2022 at 14:25:22 UTC, Andrey Zherikov
wrote:
Another interesting observation - is there any explanation why
`typeof` returns different results for generated `opAssign`?
[...]
If I move `foreach` loop
On Friday, 25 February 2022 at 14:25:22 UTC, Andrey Zherikov
wrote:
Another interesting observation - is there any explanation why
`typeof` returns different results for generated `opAssign`?
[...]
If I move `foreach` loop into a function (e.g. `main`) then the
first pragma prints the same
On Friday, 25 February 2022 at 05:25:14 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 2/24/22 20:44, Andrey Zherikov wrote:
How can I check that `opAssign` is generated by compiler and
doesn't exist in the original code?
I think this one:
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_traits.html#hasElaborateAssign
Ali
On 2/24/22 20:44, Andrey Zherikov wrote:
How can I check that `opAssign` is generated by compiler and doesn't
exist in the original code?
I think this one:
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_traits.html#hasElaborateAssign
Ali
