On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 11:04:30 UTC, biocyberman wrote:
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 16:23:45 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
What you can do for private package as of today is:
- use path-based dependencies and put your packages in the
same repo
- use git submodules and
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 16:23:45 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
What you can do for private package as of today is:
- use path-based dependencies and put your packages in the same
repo
- use git submodules and path-based dub dependencies together
If it's a public package, you can
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 14:45:07 UTC, biocyberman wrote:
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 14:18:17 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2016-12-19 13:11, biocyberman wrote:
I can write a short script to clone the remote git repo and
use it as a
submodule. But if it is possible to do with dub, it
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 14:45:07 UTC, biocyberman wrote:
I see, it is both a good thing and a bad thing. Good thing is
to encourage developers to submit packages to central dub
registry. Bad thing is, when that does not happen soon enough,
other developers who use the package will
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 14:18:17 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-12-19 13:11, biocyberman wrote:
I can write a short script to clone the remote git repo and
use it as a
submodule. But if it is possible to do with dub, it will be
more
convenient.
It's not currently possible.
I
On 2016-12-19 13:11, biocyberman wrote:
I can write a short script to clone the remote git repo and use it as a
submodule. But if it is possible to do with dub, it will be more
convenient.
It's not currently possible.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
