On 3/9/12, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 03/09/2012 07:08 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Yeah I understood it as a general concept as well. Probably many
people did. Why doesn't Andrei chime in?
I think he does not read the D.learn newsgroup.
Ah poo. This is like East Berlin in here.
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 08:03:09 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:50:57PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 08:37:38 Comrad wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 06:43:45 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
It's not correct. In TDPL it is clearly
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:10:00AM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 08:03:09 H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
TDPL, p.156, 1st two paragraphs under 5.9.1 Pseudo Members and the
@property Attribute:
One syntactic problem is that function invocations so far have
On Friday, March 09, 2012 07:56:15 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:10:00AM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 08:03:09 H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
TDPL, p.156, 1st two paragraphs under 5.9.1 Pseudo Members and the
@property Attribute:
One
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 08:50:36AM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 09, 2012 07:56:15 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:10:00AM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 08:03:09 H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
TDPL, p.156, 1st two paragraphs under
Yeah I understood it as a general concept as well. Probably many
people did. Why doesn't Andrei chime in?
On 3/9/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah I understood it as a general concept as well. Probably many
people did. Why doesn't Andrei chime in?
Btw, we all know how much Andrei loves generics so why the heck would
he care about arrays so much to only give them special
On 03/09/2012 07:08 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Yeah I understood it as a general concept as well. Probably many
people did. Why doesn't Andrei chime in?
I think he does not read the D.learn newsgroup.
On Friday, March 09, 2012 19:13:02 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/9/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah I understood it as a general concept as well. Probably many
people did. Why doesn't Andrei chime in?
I don't think that Andrei even pays attention to D.learn.
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 08:19:02 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 07:53:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
It would be nice, but I honestly don't understand the people
who think that
the lack of it is crippling. It's just one of those
nice-to-have features.
Most languages
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 07:53:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It would be nice, but I honestly don't understand the people
who think that
the lack of it is crippling. It's just one of those
nice-to-have features.
Most languages don't have anything of the sort.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 09:19:01 Kapps wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 07:53:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It would be nice, but I honestly don't understand the people
who think that
the lack of it is crippling. It's just one of those
nice-to-have features.
Most languages
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:50:57PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 08:37:38 Comrad wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 06:43:45 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
It's not correct. In TDPL it is clearly stated, that this is a
general feature of the language.
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 00:21:36 +0100, Comrad
comrad.karlov...@googlemail.com wrote:
1 struct A
2 {
3 double[2] _x;
4 }
5
6 @property ref double y(ref A a) {return a._x[1];}
7
8 void main()
9 {
10 A a1;
11 a1.y=2.;
12 }
dmd test.d gives me:
Error: no
On 03/07/2012 03:21 PM, Comrad wrote:
1 struct A
2 {
3 double[2] _x;
4 }
5
6 @property ref double y(ref A a) {return a._x[1];}
7
8 void main()
9 {
10 A a1;
11 a1.y=2.;
12 }
dmd test.d gives me:
Error: no property 'y' for type 'A'
You are testing out the new UFCS, right? Well, I
On 03/07/2012 03:54 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/07/2012 03:21 PM, Comrad wrote:
1 struct A
2 {
3 double[2] _x;
4 }
5
6 @property ref double y(ref A a) {return a._x[1];}
7
8 void main()
9 {
10 A a1;
11 a1.y=2.;
12 }
dmd test.d gives me:
Error: no property 'y' for
Don't worry Ali I thought the same thing. :p
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 00:04:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/07/2012 03:54 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/07/2012 03:21 PM, Comrad wrote:
1 struct A
2 {
3 double[2] _x;
4 }
5
6 @property ref double y(ref A a) {return a._x[1];}
7
8 void main()
9 {
10 A a1;
11 a1.y=2.;
12 }
dmd
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:32:18AM +0100, Comrad wrote:
[...]
Basically, I was following Andrei's book, where this feature is
described. It's a pity, that it's not working (except arrays somehow)
:( - I need it!
Yeah there are some features in the book that aren't completely
implemented yet.
On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 22:40:02 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:32:18AM +0100, Comrad wrote:
[...]
Basically, I was following Andrei's book, where this feature is
described. It's a pity, that it's not working (except arrays somehow)
:( - I need it!
Yeah there are
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 06:43:45 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 22:40:02 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:32:18AM +0100, Comrad wrote:
[...]
Basically, I was following Andrei's book, where this feature
is
described. It's a pity, that it's not
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 08:37:38 Comrad wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 06:43:45 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 22:40:02 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:32:18AM +0100, Comrad wrote:
[...]
Basically, I was following Andrei's book, where
22 matches
Mail list logo
