DMD 2.069.1
OS Win8.1 Enterprise
On 30.11.2015 11:50, visitor wrote:
though i don"t understand why it fails silently ??
ref2491's original code is valid, but doesn't have the intended meaning.
`e => {foo(e);}` is the same as `(e) {return () {foo(e);};}`, i.e. a
(unary) function that returns a (nullary) delegate. Calling it
On Monday, 30 November 2015 at 09:56:08 UTC, ref2401 wrote:
DMD 2.069.1
OS Win8.1 Enterprise
in a multiline statement, i believe you must use :
arr.each!((ref e) {
writeln(e);
++e;
})
"=>" is for oneliner
though i don"t understand why it fails silently ??
On Monday, 30 November 2015 at 12:03:08 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 30.11.2015 11:50, visitor wrote:
though i don"t understand why it fails silently ??
ref2491's original code is valid, but doesn't have the intended
meaning. `e => {foo(e);}` is the same as `(e) {return ()
{foo(e);};}`, i.e. a
On Monday, 30 November 2015 at 12:03:08 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 30.11.2015 11:50, visitor wrote:
though i don"t understand why it fails silently ??
ref2491's original code is valid, but doesn't have the intended
meaning. `e => {foo(e);}` is the same as `(e) {return ()
{foo(e);};}`, i.e. a
