On 2018-08-12 19:29, Eric wrote:
I thought it would work the same way as an interface (which must be
implemented by the direct sub class, otherwise compile error).
But apparently it's possible to implement an abstract function anywhere
in the class hierarchy. That makes it, in this case, impossi
On 08/12/2018 07:29 PM, Eric wrote:
I thought it would work the same way as an interface (which must be
implemented by the direct sub class, otherwise compile error).
From the spec text [1], I'd also expect an error. It says: "An abstract
member function must be overridden by a derived class."
I thought it would work the same way as an interface (which must
be implemented by the direct sub class, otherwise compile error).
But apparently it's possible to implement an abstract function
anywhere in the class hierarchy. That makes it, in this case,
impossible to check during compile time.
On Saturday, 11 August 2018 at 23:12:43 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 08/11/2018 11:20 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 12/08/2018 8:55 AM, Eric wrote:
Code below compiles while I would not expect it to compile.
Is there a reason that this compiles?
[...]
No bug. You forgot to throw -unittest when yo
On 08/11/2018 10:55 PM, Eric wrote:
Code below compiles while I would not expect it to compile.
Is there a reason that this compiles?
[...]
class I {
abstract void f();
}
class C : I {
}
unittest {
C c = cast(C) Object.factory("C");
c.f();
}
Not a bug, as far as I see.
You don't
On 12/08/2018 11:12 AM, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 08/11/2018 11:20 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 12/08/2018 8:55 AM, Eric wrote:
Code below compiles while I would not expect it to compile.
Is there a reason that this compiles?
[...]
No bug. You forgot to throw -unittest when you compiled.
[...]
E
On 08/11/2018 11:20 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 12/08/2018 8:55 AM, Eric wrote:
Code below compiles while I would not expect it to compile.
Is there a reason that this compiles?
[...]
No bug. You forgot to throw -unittest when you compiled.
[...]
Error: program killed by signal 11
If th
On 12/08/2018 8:55 AM, Eric wrote:
Code below compiles while I would not expect it to compile.
Is there a reason that this compiles?
Specs are a bit lite on abstract classes.
Only thing I found that would need to allow this is: "19.4 functions
without bodies" https://dlang.org/spec/function.htm
