On 09/10/2012 07:07 AM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 09/08/2012 09:01 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/08/2012 04:11 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
alias enum int e;
It is valid according to the grammar
I don't believe you. Show me the derivation.
The grammar as shown on dlang.org indeed seems not
On 09/08/2012 09:01 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/08/2012 04:11 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
alias enum int e;
It is valid according to the grammar
I don't believe you. Show me the derivation.
alias enum int e;
On 09/08/2012 04:11 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
alias enum int e;
It is valid according to the grammar and DMD ignores meaningless attributes.
scope shared @disable @trusted package final override deprecated extern
__gshared synchronized pure nothrow ref static abstract immutable alias
auto
Timon Gehr:
It is valid according to the grammar and DMD ignores
meaningless attributes.
Do you know why? Is it just a unfinished part of dmd, or Walter
believes this is an acceptable design for a compiler? In years I
have never heard a comment from him on this bad situation.
Bye,
On Saturday, 8 September 2012 at 16:00:44 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
scope shared @disable @trusted package final override
deprecated extern __gshared synchronized pure nothrow ref
static abstract immutable alias auto final override deprecated
extern __gshared synchronized enum pure nothrow ref
On 09/08/2012 06:44 PM, bearophile wrote:
Timon Gehr:
It is valid according to the grammar and DMD ignores meaningless
attributes.
Do you know why?
No reason.
Is it just a unfinished part of dmd, or Walter believes
this is an acceptable design for a compiler?
Jonathan would say he has
On Saturday, 8 September 2012 at 16:00:44 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/08/2012 04:11 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
alias enum int e;
It is valid according to the grammar and DMD ignores
meaningless attributes.
scope shared @disable @trusted package final override
deprecated extern __gshared
On 09/08/2012 09:25 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Saturday, 8 September 2012 at 16:00:44 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/08/2012 04:11 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
alias enum int e;
It is valid according to the grammar and DMD ignores meaningless
attributes.
scope shared @disable @trusted package
On Saturday, September 08, 2012 20:25:38 Timon Gehr wrote:
Jonathan would say he has more important things to do.
If someone else did it and had good enough arguments why the change should be
made, then it might make it in, but on top of Walter's time issues, this
strikes me as the sort of
On Saturday, 8 September 2012 at 18:16:33 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
Time to hold an obfuscated D contest!
Hmmm... A little more difficult compared to C, since you don't
have the pre-processor.
I recall TCC (Tiny C Compiler) was originally done in a
obfuscation contest where he got the main
2012/9/8 Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch:
On 09/08/2012 09:25 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Saturday, 8 September 2012 at 16:00:44 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/08/2012 04:11 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
alias enum int e;
It is valid according to the grammar and DMD ignores meaningless
12 matches
Mail list logo