On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 05:30:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, April 18, 2016 04:25:25 Jon D via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I have an dub config file specifying a targetType of
'executable'. There is only one file, the file containing
main(), and no unit tests.
When I run 'dub
On Monday, April 18, 2016 04:25:25 Jon D via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I have an dub config file specifying a targetType of
> 'executable'. There is only one file, the file containing main(),
> and no unit tests.
>
> When I run 'dub test', dub builds and runs the executable. This
> is not
On 04/17/2016 02:33 AM, Suliman wrote:
Could you write article about D for Csharp programmers? About D benefits
While waiting for that document: :)
http://dconf.org/2013/talks/wilson.html
Ali
I have an dub config file specifying a targetType of
'executable'. There is only one file, the file containing main(),
and no unit tests.
When I run 'dub test', dub builds and runs the executable. This
is not really desirable. Is there a way to set up the dub
configuration file to disable
On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 03:57:26 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
x,y,and z seem to all be immutable and all have the UDA
testUDA. But even odder, it seems that "struct" in there is
doing absolutely nothing. The same thing can be done with
Yeah, any attribute can be grouped with braces or colons
On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 03:33:53 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
The struct inside union is the main pure-language use case I
know of though.
Actually curiously I found another potential use, applying
attributes/UDAs to multiple members at once.
enum testUDA;
struct T{
@testUDA
On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 03:33:53 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
The struct inside union is the main pure-language use case I
know of though.
I understand the reason for allowing it in a union, I just don't
see the reason it was extended to all aggregates as it seems to
do nothing.
On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 02:42:15 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
IIRC D doesn't allow anonymous structures.
They are allowed only if they are inside another aggregate.
On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 02:12:24 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what is the point of the following?
struct a{
struct{
int x;
int y;
int z;
}
}
The grouping matters when it is nested inside a union. Here's a
On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 02:42:15 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 02:12:24 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what is the point of the following?
struct a{
struct{
int x;
int y;
int z;
}
}
As
On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 02:12:24 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what is the point of the following?
struct a{
struct{
int x;
int y;
int z;
}
}
As far as I can tell, the anonymous structure does nothing. How
is
Just out of curiosity, what is the point of the following?
struct a{
struct{
int x;
int y;
int z;
}
}
As far as I can tell, the anonymous structure does nothing. How
is it different from
struct a{
int x;
int y;
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 13:56:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Perhaps, but be aware that Walter Bright thinks that size_t
should stay as-is:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/nevrsb$2ge1$1...@digitalmars.com
Maybe some sort of general change to how aliases work would be
acceptable and would
Is there a way to specify a minimum Phobos version in a dub
package specification?
--Jon
On 17.04.2016 13:00, denizzzka wrote:
So, my problem is solved. But nevertheless maybe here is a problem in
the compiler too.
I've reduced the test case and filed an issue:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15936
On Sunday, April 17, 2016 12:07:45 Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 11:47:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Sunday, April 17, 2016 11:00:15 Nicholas Wilson via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 10:48:08 UTC,
On Saturday, 16 April 2016 at 12:37:46 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On Saturday, 16 April 2016 at 00:03:59 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, April 15, 2016 20:52:42 WebFreak001 via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
void assertf(string file = __FILE__, size_t line = __LINE__,
Args...)(lazy bool
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 10:27:10 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 10:22:00 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 10:12:29 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
So currently there is a loss of information when Parameters
Fields and Return type.
i.e. assuming 64
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 11:47:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, April 17, 2016 11:00:15 Nicholas Wilson via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 10:48:08 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> [...]
Sorry for the confusion, I didn't. getting the string "size_t"
as the
On Sunday, April 17, 2016 11:00:15 Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 10:48:08 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Sunday, April 17, 2016 10:12:29 Nicholas Wilson via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> [...]
> >
> > I'm actually surprised that you
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 10:48:08 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, April 17, 2016 10:12:29 Nicholas Wilson via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
I'm actually surprised that you got the compiler to give you
size_t in any form. size_t is simply an alias to either ulong
(on 64-bit
As Alex Parrill says, on problem was in const member. But this is
one of the problems, and after fix here still was an error.
But alphaglosined found another problem! For some unknown reason
here it is need to specify an empty postblit constructor.
Full patch:
On Sunday, April 17, 2016 10:12:29 Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> So currently there is a loss of information when Parameters
> Fields and Return type.
> i.e. assuming 64 bits
> size_t foo(ptrdiff_t) {};
>
> writeln(ReturnType!foo); // prints ulong
>
> Is there any way to get
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 10:22:00 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 10:12:29 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
So currently there is a loss of information when Parameters
Fields and Return type.
i.e. assuming 64 bits
size_t foo(ptrdiff_t) {};
writeln(ReturnType!foo); // prints
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 10:12:29 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
So currently there is a loss of information when Parameters
Fields and Return type.
i.e. assuming 64 bits
size_t foo(ptrdiff_t) {};
writeln(ReturnType!foo); // prints ulong
Is there any way to get the types as (tuples of)
So currently there is a loss of information when Parameters
Fields and Return type.
i.e. assuming 64 bits
size_t foo(ptrdiff_t) {};
writeln(ReturnType!foo); // prints ulong
Is there any way to get the types as (tuples of) strings of the
the types as they are in the source file?
auto foos =
On Saturday, 16 April 2016 at 18:13:57 UTC, Bauss wrote:
On Saturday, 16 April 2016 at 14:08:05 UTC, newB wrote:
Let's say you have decided to use D programming language. For
what kind of applications would you choose D programming
language and For what kind of applications you won't
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 06:42:39 UTC, denizzzka wrote:
Tried to build small test app - is not reproduced.
Also tried to reduce source:
https://github.com/denizzzka/r-tree/tree/314f7f1cc1b6387915dc56dcb2d3ccbc63e19275/source
In this source line 199 causes this error
Tried to build small test app - is not reproduced.
29 matches
Mail list logo
