https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/5500 maybe this
This very simple stuff:
class Item
{
alias children this;
Item[] children;
void populate()
{
children ~= new Item;
assert(children.length == 1);
}
}
void main()
{
Item root = new Item;
root.populate;
}
leads to an assertion failure. Am I too tired to
Hey,
the code bellow compiles with dmd 2.071.2, but doesn't compile
with the same command with dmd 2.072.0 beta2. Maybe someone knows
what's going wrong or whether it is a bug in 2.071.2/2.072.0 (it
is a reduced part from memutils):
app.d:
import memutils.utils;
struct HashMap(Key, Value)
Dne 21.10.2016 v 21:03 DLearner via Digitalmars-d-learn napsal(a):
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 09:07:35 UTC, cym13 wrote:
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 08:58:50 UTC, DLearner wrote:
[...]
What makes you think that? It's hard to tell if you don't give any
information.
I pressed the
They would have for constraint
`if (isInputRange!Range && isInputRange!(ElementType!Range))`
In case you wouldn't see directly what would they be used for,
it's for tree-like structures. Each element in a Range is also an
input range.
I see 3 obvious functions/templates
- the most
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 09:07:35 UTC, cym13 wrote:
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 08:58:50 UTC, DLearner wrote:
[...]
What makes you think that? It's hard to tell if you don't give
any information.
I pressed the 'Run' button and got the 'Hello World'.
I pressed the 'Disassembly'
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 19:27:59 UTC, cym13 wrote:
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 19:03:30 UTC, DLearner wrote:
[...]
That's a problem about the debugger/disassembler that you use,
not about D.
We can't do anything else to help as you give no information.
See my post:
- I gave the
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 19:03:30 UTC, DLearner wrote:
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 09:07:35 UTC, cym13 wrote:
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 08:58:50 UTC, DLearner wrote:
[...]
What makes you think that? It's hard to tell if you don't give
any information.
I pressed the 'Run'
On 10/21/2016 06:55 PM, Basile B. wrote:
This very simple stuff:
class Item
{
alias children this;
Item[] children;
void populate()
{
children ~= new Item;
assert(children.length == 1);
}
}
void main()
{
Item root = new Item;
root.populate;
}
leads
I've tinkered with what you proposed. In the process I've worked
through a variety of errors and ended up doing things I don't
think are a good solution like duplication directories so that a
library can be found.
Let me see if I understand how to piece together a build. Some
combination of
On Saturday, 22 October 2016 at 01:31:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
* They can be passed directly to the compiler along with your
own source. This will cause them to be compiled and ultimately
linked into the resulting binary.
That's what I recommend. Just
dmd yourfile.d yourotherfiles.d
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 23:16:55 UTC, Jason C. Wells wrote:
I've tinkered with what you proposed. In the process I've
worked through a variety of errors and ended up doing things I
don't think are a good solution like duplication directories so
that a library can be found.
Let me see
On 22/10/2016 6:25 PM, Mark wrote:
Hello, Im a 3rd year Comp Sci student in Edmonton Alberta, Canada.
Ive learned how to use C, and dabbled in C++ in school. Im also in a Oop
course using Java.
I picked up the book The D Programming Language by Alexrei Alexandrescu
a few years ago.
Lately Im
First, thank you for taking the time to help me with something
that should be trivial.
I've done the above listing of file on the command line but I'm
still stuck. I'm starting to think that I might actually be
tripping over bugs, but I'm not confident enough to believe that
without some
Hello, Im a 3rd year Comp Sci student in Edmonton Alberta, Canada.
Ive learned how to use C, and dabbled in C++ in school. Im also
in a Oop course using Java.
I picked up the book The D Programming Language by Alexrei
Alexandrescu a few years ago.
Lately Im really wanting to get into D, as
Thanks for the fast reply.
That did work. But now the error is on the line:
dictionary[word] = newId;
I changed the value to 10, still errors. ??
everything else is as before.
thanks.
On Saturday, 22 October 2016 at 05:41:34 UTC, Mark wrote:
Thanks for the fast reply.
That did work. But now the error is on the line:
dictionary[word] = newId;
I changed the value to 10, still errors. ??
everything else is as before.
thanks.
For simple single file experiments
Next try:
dustmite --no-redirect src "dmd -main -unittest -g -debug
array_ex container_traits searching_ex && { ./array_ex; } >
grep SIGABRT log"
but that fails too as
Loading src/w3c.html
None => /bin/sh: 1: Syntax error: Bad fd number
No
object.Exception@dustmite.d(270): Initial test
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 01:34:44 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
When using reflection to obtain the fields of a class/struct,
is there any guarantee that the order is the same as the order
the fields are defined?
Yes they should always come in lexical order.
On 21/10/2016 8:55 PM, TheFlyingFiddle wrote:
I am trying to port a serialization library I wrote in Lua some time
ago. I've ran into a problem relating to types with anonymous unions
inside.
Given this code:
enum Kind
{
none = 0,
array,
integer,
floating,
}
struct Foo
{
Kind
I am trying to port a serialization library I wrote in Lua some
time ago. I've ran into a problem relating to types with
anonymous unions inside.
Given this code:
enum Kind
{
none = 0,
array,
integer,
floating,
}
struct Foo
{
Kind type;
union
{
ulong integer;
On 21/10/2016 9:13 PM, TheFlyingFiddle wrote:
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 07:56:27 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
You're gonna have to use UDA's for that.
Yes, to do the serialization you're right.
But my usecase for this is for error reporting. Basically any struct
that contains unions
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 08:18:58 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 21/10/2016 9:13 PM, TheFlyingFiddle wrote:
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 07:56:27 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
You're gonna have to use UDA's for that.
Yes, to do the serialization you're right.
But my usecase for this
Code ran with expected output, but Disassembly seemed to go in a
loop?
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 08:58:50 UTC, DLearner wrote:
Code ran with expected output, but Disassembly seemed to go in
a loop?
What makes you think that? It's hard to tell if you don't give
any information.
Let's do that! I'll use only naive flags and all and use radare2
to
disassemble
When using reflection to obtain the fields of a class/struct, is there
any guarantee that the order is the same as the order the fields are
defined?
On Thursday, 20 October 2016 at 22:18:20 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 20 October 2016 at 21:33:59 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
I need your help here, I'm complete stuck. Vladimir?
The exit status of the `./array_ex` call (as seen from bash) is
134. How do I, in Bash, map that exit
On Thursday, 20 October 2016 at 12:38:40 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 October 2016 at 19:39:46 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 October 2016 at 19:01:50 UTC, Meta wrote:
https://goo.gl/t9m3YK
I'm actually pretty impressed that this kind of code can be
written in D.
Thanks! Add
On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 06:44:54 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Thursday, 20 October 2016 at 22:18:20 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
On Thursday, 20 October 2016 at 21:33:59 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
I need your help here, I'm complete stuck. Vladimir?
The exit status of the `./array_ex` call (as
On Wednesday, 19 October 2016 at 16:01:37 UTC, Alfred Newman
wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to handle a SQLite3 table with D. During my
researchs, I discovered the lib
https://dlang.org/phobos/etc_c_sqlite3.html.
However, for any reason, there is no code snippets or sample
codes available
30 matches
Mail list logo
