On Friday, 17 June 2016 at 08:09:42 UTC, John wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 at 21:06:01 UTC, Joerg Joergonson
wrote:
My thinking is that CoCreateinstance is suppose to give us a
pointer to the interface so we can use it, if all this stuff
is crashing does that mean the interface is invalid
On Friday, 17 June 2016 at 08:09:42 UTC, John wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 at 21:06:01 UTC, Joerg Joergonson
wrote:
[...]
The problem is Photoshop hasn't provided an interface with
methods that can be called directly. They don't exist on the
interface, hence them being commented out.
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 20:27:09 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 17:08:42 UTC, Whatsthisnow wrote:
I guess i am just too used to the java way of x.equals(object)
which at the source is exactly 'return this == object'
Java would return false here too, though, if it actually
On Saturday, 11 March 2017 at 00:34:03 UTC, Paul D Anderson wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 22:04:23 UTC, Paul D Anderson wrote:
While building DMD -- "make -fwin32.mak release" -- I received
the following error message:
echo "2.073.2" > verstr.h
Error: don't know how to make
On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at 18:21:35 UTC, Damien Gibson wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at 06:28:47 UTC, Jerry wrote:
You have to use "export" for any symbol to be visible from a
dll. On Windows by default nothing is exported.
Would "export" and "export extern(D):" not be the same? Im
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 22:04:23 UTC, Paul D Anderson wrote:
While building DMD -- "make -fwin32.mak release" -- I received
the following error message:
echo "2.073.2" > verstr.h
Error: don't know how to make '../res/default_ddoc_theme/ddoc'
--- error level 1
I'm guessing it might be a
While building DMD -- "make -fwin32.mak release" -- I received
the following error message:
echo "2.073.2" > verstr.h
Error: don't know how to make '../res/default_ddoc_theme/ddoc'
--- error level 1
I'm guessing it might be a build configuration problem on my end,
but what is the problem?
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 19:24:29 UTC, bauss wrote:
Mark your variables with __gshared. I would say shred, but it
has some restrictions to it, where __gshared is the equivalent
to global variables in C.
immutable variables are also not put in TLS.
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 17:08:42 UTC, Whatsthisnow wrote:
I guess i am just too used to the java way of x.equals(object)
which at the source is exactly 'return this == object'
Java would return false here too, though, if it actually did
`this == object` in its default compare method. If
On 03/10/2017 08:22 AM, DRex wrote:
Error: function app.A.opEquals does not override any function, did you
mean to override 'object.Object.opEquals'?
My A class appears exactly as mentioned in your comment...
FWIW, here's some other info:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 07:33:44 UTC, M-exe wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 07:17:22 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
D does not support Windows XP.
If you absolutely require it, you will have to contact Walter
about support.
Let me care about it ;)
I just need help with the TLS :)
Mark
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 16:47:47 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 16:36:17 UTC, DRex wrote:
I'm fairly new to D, but this seems to be quite a pain in the
rear for a simple comparison of instances of classes...really
odd that comparing instances of classes in D requires
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 16:36:17 UTC, DRex wrote:
I'm fairly new to D, but this seems to be quite a pain in the
rear for a simple comparison of instances of classes...really
odd that comparing instances of classes in D requires that
messing around when D seems all about simplifying
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 16:30:00 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 16:22:18 UTC, DRex wrote:
Error: function app.A.opEquals does not override any function,
did you mean to override 'object.Object.opEquals'?
Oh sorry, maybe I messed up the const. Try:
override bool
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 16:22:18 UTC, DRex wrote:
Error: function app.A.opEquals does not override any function,
did you mean to override 'object.Object.opEquals'?
Oh sorry, maybe I messed up the const. Try:
override bool opEquals(A rhs) { ... }
and if the compiler still complains
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 16:13:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 16:08:05 UTC, DRex wrote:
Am I missing something here?
Yeah, you need to implement a custom equality operator.
class A {
int member;
override bool opEquals(const A rhs) {
return
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 16:08:05 UTC, DRex wrote:
Am I missing something here?
Yeah, you need to implement a custom equality operator.
class A {
int member;
override bool opEquals(const A rhs) {
return this.member == rhs.member; // and other members
that need to be equal
Hi,
I am trying to compare two instances of a class. I created a
test program to try this, but every method I use to compare the
instances always returns false.
this is my code to test comparison
class A
{
this()
{
}
}
void main()
{
A a = new A();
A a2 = new A();
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 14:36:48 UTC, Suliman wrote:
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 16:47:18 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 16:40:13 UTC, Suliman wrote:
How should I write to file result without \r\n\ symbols?
auto x = content.matchFirst(bigCodeBlock);
File f =
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 16:47:18 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 16:40:13 UTC, Suliman wrote:
How should I write to file result without \r\n\ symbols?
auto x = content.matchFirst(bigCodeBlock);
File f = File("foo.txt", "w");
f.write(x);
Just
f.write(x[0]);
to
Example:
/**
test type
*/
struct A(bool T) {
static if (T) {
/// Case 1
int ok(){ return 1; }
} else {
/// case 2
int notok(){ return 1; }
}
/// Other
int other() { return 0; }
}
///
21 matches
Mail list logo
