On Saturday, 29 February 2020 at 21:56:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Because you mentioned canFind, I think you want the semantics
to be "is there an element with this value." If so, it would be
confusing to use the same operator for two different things:
For associative arrays, it means "is
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 11:33:25 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Sunday, 1 March 2020 at 20:58:42 UTC, p.shkadzko wrote:
Hello again,
[snip]
What compiler did you use and what flags?
Ah yes, sorry. I used latest ldc2 (1.20.0-x64) for Windows.
Dflags -mcpu=native and "inline", "optimize",
On 3/2/20 6:39 AM, JN wrote:
On Saturday, 29 February 2020 at 21:56:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Because you mentioned canFind, I think you want the semantics to be
"is there an element with this value." If so, it would be confusing to
use the same operator for two different things: For
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 13:35:15 UTC, p.shkadzko wrote:
[snip]
Thanks. I don't have time right now to review this thoroughly. My
recollection is that the dot product of two matrices is actually
matrix multiplication, correct? It generally makes sense to defer
to other people's
On 3/2/20 6:52 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Saturday, 29 February 2020 at 20:11:24 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
1. in is supposed to be O(lg(n)) or better. Generic code may depend on
this property. Searching an array is O(n).
Probably it should work if we're using a "SortedRange".
int[]
On Sunday, 1 March 2020 at 20:58:42 UTC, p.shkadzko wrote:
Hello again,
[snip]
What compiler did you use and what flags?
On Saturday, 29 February 2020 at 20:11:24 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
1. in is supposed to be O(lg(n)) or better. Generic code may
depend on this property. Searching an array is O(n).
Probably it should work if we're using a "SortedRange".
int[] a = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9];
auto
Hello. :-)
I found this guide
:
https://www.kksou.com/php-gtk2/sample-codes/display-a-list-of-thumbnail-images-using-GtkIconView.php
This guide used 'Pixbuf' for use fromFile method, but GtkD don't
have it.
: https://api.gtkd.org/gdkpixbuf.Pixbuf.Pixbuf.html
Is there any other way?
Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 7:40 PM Daniel Kozak wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 6:50 PM Severin Teona via Digitalmars-d-learn
> Do you really need to build you app on arm, could not you use crosscompiling?
https://wiki.dlang.org/Cross-compiling_with_LDC
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 6:50 PM Severin Teona via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a project that uses a Raspberry Pi (armv7l) and
> the latest LDC version I found for this architecture is 1.13.0.
> Can you help me install the latest version(1.20.0)?
>
> Also, I'm having
Hello,
I am working on a project that uses a Raspberry Pi (armv7l) and
the latest LDC version I found for this architecture is 1.13.0.
Can you help me install the latest version(1.20.0)?
Also, I'm having problems using the DPP package with the 1.13.0
LDC version, most likely because the
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 15:00:56 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 13:35:15 UTC, p.shkadzko wrote:
[snip]
Thanks. I don't have time right now to review this thoroughly.
My recollection is that the dot product of two matrices is
actually matrix multiplication, correct? It
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 7:40 PM Daniel Kozak wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 6:50 PM Severin Teona via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am working on a project that uses a Raspberry Pi (armv7l) and
> > the latest LDC version I found for this architecture is 1.13.0.
> > Can
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 17:45:26 UTC, Severin Teona wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a project that uses a Raspberry Pi (armv7l) and
the latest LDC version I found for this architecture is 1.13.0.
Can you help me install the latest version(1.20.0)?
Also, I'm having problems using the DPP
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 17:45:26 UTC, Severin Teona wrote:
Is there any reason why the LDC team stopped releasing
pre-built binaries for arm?
It's the only package that isn't auto-generated by CI services
and requires manual steps in a painfully slow qemu environment, a
process that takes
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 21:33:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/2/20 3:52 PM, aliak wrote:
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 15:47:26 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/2/20 6:52 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Saturday, 29 February 2020 at 20:11:24 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
1. in
On 3/2/20 5:21 PM, aliak wrote:
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 21:33:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/2/20 3:52 PM, aliak wrote:
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 15:47:26 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/2/20 6:52 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Saturday, 29 February 2020 at 20:11:24 UTC,
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 15:50:08 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/2/20 6:39 AM, JN wrote:
On Saturday, 29 February 2020 at 21:56:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
Because you mentioned canFind, I think you want the semantics
to be "is there an element with this value." If so, it would
be
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 15:47:26 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/2/20 6:52 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Saturday, 29 February 2020 at 20:11:24 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
1. in is supposed to be O(lg(n)) or better. Generic code may
depend on this property. Searching an array is
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 20:56:50 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 20:22:55 UTC, p.shkadzko wrote:
[snip]
Interesting growth of processing time. Could it be GC?
+--+-+
| matrixDotProduct | time (sec.) |
+--+-+
| 2x[100 x
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 06:27:22PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> Yeah, this looked very fishy to me. ldc can do some nasty "helpful"
> things to save you time! When I posted my results, I was using DMD.
>
> I used run.dlang.io with ldc, and verified I get the
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 07:51:34PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> On 3/2/20 6:46 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > To prevent the optimizer from eliding "useless" code, you need to do
> > something with the return value that isn't trivial (assigning to a
> > variable
On Sunday, 1 March 2020 at 20:58:42 UTC, p.shkadzko wrote:
Hello again,
Thanks to previous thread on multidimensional arrays, I managed
to play around with pure D matrix representations and even
benchmark a little against numpy:
[...]
Matrix multiplication is about cache-friendly
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 23:27:22 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
What I think is happening is that it determines nobody is using
the result, and the function is pure, so it doesn't bother
calling that function (probably not even the lambda, and then
probably removes the loop completely).
On 3/2/20 7:32 PM, aliak wrote:
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 23:27:22 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
What I think is happening is that it determines nobody is using the
result, and the function is pure, so it doesn't bother calling that
function (probably not even the lambda, and then
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 17:45:26 UTC, Severin Teona wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a project that uses a Raspberry Pi (armv7l) and
the latest LDC version I found for this architecture is 1.13.0.
Can you help me install the latest version(1.20.0)?
Also, I'm having problems using the DPP
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 18:17:05 UTC, p.shkadzko wrote:
[snip]
I tested @fastmath and @optmath for toIdx function and that
didn't change anyting.
@optmath is from mir, correct? I believe it implies @fastmath.
The latest code in mir doesn't have it doing anything else at
least.
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 16:37:46 UTC,
cfcd14f496326e429ce03c48650b7966 wrote:
Hello. :-)
I found this guide
:
https://www.kksou.com/php-gtk2/sample-codes/display-a-list-of-thumbnail-images-using-GtkIconView.php
This guide used 'Pixbuf' for use fromFile method, but GtkD
don't have it.
:
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 20:22:55 UTC, p.shkadzko wrote:
[snip]
Interesting growth of processing time. Could it be GC?
+--+-+
| matrixDotProduct | time (sec.) |
+--+-+
| 2x[100 x 100]|0.01 |
| 2x[1000 x 1000] |2.21
On 3/2/20 3:52 PM, aliak wrote:
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 15:47:26 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/2/20 6:52 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Saturday, 29 February 2020 at 20:11:24 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
1. in is supposed to be O(lg(n)) or better. Generic code may depend
on this
On Sunday, 1 March 2020 at 20:58:42 UTC, p.shkadzko wrote:
Hello again,
Thanks to previous thread on multidimensional arrays, I managed
to play around with pure D matrix representations and even
benchmark a little against numpy:
[...]
Interesting growth of processing time. Could it be GC?
31 matches
Mail list logo
