Is there any particular reason why std.range : enumerate is a
thing and
foreach (i, e; range) { ... }
doesn't work from the get-go? I wouldn't have such an issue with
it if static foreach would work with enumerate just fine. As far
as I can tell,
foreach (e; range) { ... }
is
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:53:16PM +, Q. Schroll via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Is there any particular reason why std.range : enumerate is a thing
> and
>
> foreach (i, e; range) { ... }
>
> doesn't work from the get-go?
[...]
std.range.indexed is your friend. ;-)
T
--
Let's eat
On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 23:53:16 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:
Is there any particular reason why std.range : enumerate is a
thing and
foreach (i, e; range) { ... }
doesn't work from the get-go? I wouldn't have such an issue
with it if static foreach would work with enumerate just fine.
As
On Monday, 8 June 2020 at 14:41:55 UTC, Jan Hönig wrote:
On Sunday, 7 June 2020 at 00:45:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
dmd -mixin= ...
thanks for the tip!
writeln(q{
void foo() {
}
});
What is the name of this `q` thing?
How do i find it? Are there any recent tutorials
On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 23:53:16 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:
Is there any particular reason why std.range : enumerate is a
thing and
[...]
I don't think there is any particular reason. Other than that
might shadow an opApply.
And C++ iterators didn't have it.
On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 17:58:56 UTC, welkam wrote:
I tried to compile a 32 bit executable but my system does not
have 32 bit phobos. How do I get 32 bit phobos? I am using
Manjaro.
dmd -m32 source/test2.d
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 05:03:55PM -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:53:16PM +, Q. Schroll via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
> > Is there any particular reason why std.range : enumerate is a thing
> > and
> >
> > foreach (i, e; range) { ... }
>
On Wednesday, 10 June 2020 at 01:06:30 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 14:23:34 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I notice that in the new release for Alpine Linux it mentions
support for D.
I was curious what was meant by this and thought someone here
would know. Just high level,
On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 14:23:34 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I notice that in the new release for Alpine Linux it mentions
support for D.
I was curious what was meant by this and thought someone here
would know. Just high level, like druntime was ported or
packages added to the repo?
On Wednesday, 10 June 2020 at 00:53:30 UTC, Seb wrote:
It's a bit more complicated though as you need to avoid subtle
breakage with ranges that return tuples that are auto-expanded
like e.g. `foreach (k,v; myDict)`.
Okay, I can accept that. It's a poor decision, but well, it is
what it is.
On Wednesday, 10 June 2020 at 01:35:32 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2020 at 00:53:30 UTC, Seb wrote:
It's a bit more complicated though as you need to avoid subtle
breakage with ranges that return tuples that are auto-expanded
like e.g. `foreach (k,v; myDict)`.
Okay, I can
On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 14:23:34 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I notice that in the new release for Alpine Linux it mentions
support for D.
Announcement:
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/raue6j$1vp4$2...@digitalmars.com
I notice that in the new release for Alpine Linux it mentions
support for D.
I was curious what was meant by this and thought someone here
would know. Just high level, like druntime was ported or packages
added to the repo?
I don't see how to filter a custom version identifier from this
traits code:
---
module test;
import std.traits : isCallable;
version(all) version = my_version;
private bool onlyFuncs()
{
bool result = true;
foreach (member; __traits(allMembers, mixin(__MODULE__)))
{
I tried to compile a 32 bit executable but my system does not
have 32 bit phobos. How do I get 32 bit phobos? I am using
Manjaro.
dmd -m32 source/test2.d
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/10.1.0/../../../libphobos2.a
when searching for -lphobos2
/usr/bin/ld:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 17:40:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Any idea ?
As I replied in the issue report:
Instead of
static if (!is(mixin(member) == module) && !(is(mixin(member
use
static if (is(typeof(mixin(member
On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 18:08:01 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 17:40:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Any idea ?
As I replied in the issue report:
Instead of
static if (!is(mixin(member) == module) &&
!(is(mixin(member
use
static if (is(typeof(mixin(member
On 6/8/20 7:50 AM, ag0aep6g wrote:
https://ddili.org/ders/d.en/literals.html#ix_literals.q%7B%7D
Thank you.
I am biased but I like my :) index of the book, where all such syntax
items appear:
https://ddili.org/ders/d.en/ix.html
Ali
On 09.06.20 20:16, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I am biased but I like my :) index of the book, where all such syntax
items appear:
https://ddili.org/ders/d.en/ix.html
Oh yeah. It's how I got the link. You might want to fix some of the
URLs, though. Characters like '{' or '[' need to be
19 matches
Mail list logo
