I mean, I can't copy text from my program to the clipboard.
- Joelcnz
On 12-Sep-11 3:50 PM, Joel Christensen wrote:
Thanks Jimmy. Your example worked. Or though I haven't managed to get
the other way to work.
[code]
import std.stdio;
//import core.stdc.string;
import std.c.string;
import
I've set up a Windows 7 machine for working on DMD but I can't get
windbg to work properly. Specifically, when I try to debug DMD itself, I
don't get a call stack; I only see the current function.
Everything else seems OK.
Has anyone else experienced this? Any ideas?
You could also use cv2pdb's -C option and Visual Studio to debug dmd.
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:06:44 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/10/11, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic Wrote:
Wait a minute, I've just realized private on a class definition has no
effect. Why is that?
Try to import that class from
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:11:11 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 09/11/2011 11:12 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, September 11, 2011 14:00:55 Charles Hixson wrote:
On 09/11/2011 01:25 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 23:02:37 +0300, Charles Hixson
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:48:36 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev
vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote:
What's the simplest const-correct way to write a method which returns
this?
I tried the following to no avail:
class Test
{
inout(Test) f() inout
{
return this;
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:11:11 +0200, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
I think the fact that in for AAs returns a pointer is a mistake and
ugly in the first place and any generic code that relies on any
container to return a raw internal pointer is flawed by itself imho.
If D had a
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:10:35 -0400, Simen Kjaeraas
simen.kja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:11:11 +0200, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
I think the fact that in for AAs returns a pointer is a mistake and
ugly in the first place and any generic code that relies on any
On 09/12/2011 04:17 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:10:35 -0400, Simen Kjaeraas
simen.kja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:11:11 +0200, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
I think the fact that in for AAs returns a pointer is a mistake and
ugly in the first
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:24:52 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 09/12/2011 04:17 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:10:35 -0400, Simen Kjaeraas
simen.kja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:11:11 +0200, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
wrote:
I think the
On 09/12/2011 04:34 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:24:52 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 09/12/2011 04:17 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:10:35 -0400, Simen Kjaeraas
simen.kja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:11:11
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:02:20 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 09/12/2011 04:34 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:24:52 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
wrote:
On 09/12/2011 04:17 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:10:35 -0400, Simen
On 09/12/2011 05:16 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:02:20 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 09/12/2011 04:34 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:24:52 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
wrote:
On 09/12/2011 04:17 PM, Steven
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:23:36 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 09/12/2011 05:16 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:02:20 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
wrote:
On 09/12/2011 04:34 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:24:52 -0400, Timon
On Monday, September 12, 2011 17:23:36 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/12/2011 05:16 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I'd say the array had to be a literal, or guaranteed sorted to support
in. I'm not sure that's a great thing.
But in order to do all this, we have to consider that a *lot* of code
The other way is a bit more complicated.
Try this:
import std.stdio;
import core.stdc.string;
import std.string;
extern(Windows) {
bool OpenClipboard(void*);
void* GetClipboardData(uint);
void* SetClipboardData(uint, void*);
bool EmptyClipboard();
bool CloseClipboard();
void*
Thanks so much Jimmy. You put in a bit of effort. :-)
I just added this code to my general library:
extern(Windows) {
bool OpenClipboard(void*);
void* GetClipboardData(uint);
void* SetClipboardData(uint, void*);
bool EmptyClipboard();
bool CloseClipboard();
void*
A D2 program:
struct Foo {
int x;
static int y;
pure void foo1() {
this.x++;
}
static pure void foo2() {
Foo.y++; // line 8, error
}
}
void main() {}
With DMD 2.055 it gives at compile-time:
test.d(8): Error: pure function 'foo2' cannot access mutable
On Monday, September 12, 2011 15:24 bearophile wrote:
A D2 program:
struct Foo {
int x;
static int y;
pure void foo1() {
this.x++;
}
static pure void foo2() {
Foo.y++; // line 8, error
}
}
void main() {}
With DMD 2.055 it gives at compile-time:
test.d(8): Error: pure function
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:00:51 +0300, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
I don't get a call stack; I only see the current function.
Generally (not specific to DMD or WinDbg), this is a sign that the
executable was compiled without stack frames (or that the stack is
corrupted).
--
Best regards,
The simplest way I found is:
TickDuration.from!hnsecs(duration.total!hnsecs)
Is there a simpler way?
--
Best regards,
Vladimirmailto:vladi...@thecybershadow.net
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:55 +0300, Charles Hixson
charleshi...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 09/11/2011 01:25 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 23:02:37 +0300, Charles Hixson
charleshi...@earthlink.net wrote:
I can't figure it out from
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 04:32:28 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
The simplest way I found is:
TickDuration.from!hnsecs(duration.total!hnsecs)
Is there a simpler way?
I don't believe so. A TickDuration can be cast (or use std.conv.to) to convert
to a Duration, but there is no cast in the
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 05:01:31 +0300, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
What are you doing that you want to create a TickDuration from a
Duration?
On the one side, I have a module for running scheduled events. Event
timing is specified using a TickDuration, indicating the time
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 05:13:02 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 05:01:31 +0300, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
What are you doing that you want to create a TickDuration from a
Duration?
On the one side, I have a module for running scheduled events.
Trying to help someone on SO, I ran into problems.
On a 64-bit Linux machine, with DMD 2.055
This gives: '/Internal error: ../ztc/cg87.c 202'
void main(){
auto f = (double m){ static double sum = 0.0; return sum += m * m; };
double[] a = array(map!f(iota(1.0, 25.0, 1.0)));
writeln(a);
}
On Monday, September 12, 2011 22:31:33 Caligo wrote:
Trying to help someone on SO, I ran into problems.
On a 64-bit Linux machine, with DMD 2.055
This gives: '/Internal error: ../ztc/cg87.c 202'
void main(){
auto f = (double m){ static double sum = 0.0; return sum += m * m; };
double[]
Great. So is it a known bug?
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.comwrote:
On Monday, September 12, 2011 22:31:33 Caligo wrote:
Trying to help someone on SO, I ran into problems.
On a 64-bit Linux machine, with DMD 2.055
This gives: '/Internal error:
On Monday, September 12, 2011 22:38:25 Caligo wrote:
Great. So is it a known bug?
I don't know. You'd have to search bugzilla: d.puremagic.com/issues
- Jonathan M Davis
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.comwrote:
On Monday, September 12, 2011 22:38:25 Caligo wrote:
Great. So is it a known bug?
I don't know. You'd have to search bugzilla: d.puremagic.com/issues
- Jonathan M Davis
Searching bugzilla (horrible technology)
30 matches
Mail list logo
