It's a strong typed handle, in C it's declared as
#ifdef STRICT
typedef void *HANDLE;
#if 0 && (_MSC_VER > 1000)
#define DECLARE_HANDLE(name) struct name##__; typedef struct
name##__ *name
#else
#define DECLARE_HANDLE(name) struct name##__{int unused;};
typedef struct name##__ *name
#endif
#e
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 20:51:37 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
I noticed in druntime this template is used often:
package template DECLARE_HANDLE(string name, base = HANDLE) {
mixin ("alias " ~ base.stringof ~ " " ~ name ~ ";");
If my memory is correct, it is actually for old D compatibil
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 20:51:37 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Hi,
I noticed in druntime this template is used often:
package template DECLARE_HANDLE(string name, base = HANDLE) {
mixin ("alias " ~ base.stringof ~ " " ~ name ~ ";");
The disadvantage is, IDEs like IntelliJ are not able to
On 1/31/19 3:51 PM, Andre Pany wrote:
Hi,
I noticed in druntime this template is used often:
package template DECLARE_HANDLE(string name, base = HANDLE) {
mixin ("alias " ~ base.stringof ~ " " ~ name ~ ";");
The disadvantage is, IDEs like IntelliJ are not able to find the symbols
using t
Hi,
I noticed in druntime this template is used often:
package template DECLARE_HANDLE(string name, base = HANDLE) {
mixin ("alias " ~ base.stringof ~ " " ~ name ~ ";");
The disadvantage is, IDEs like IntelliJ are not able to find the
symbols using this template e.g.
mixin DECLARE_HANDLE!
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 13:25:21 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 13:18:39 UTC, Langer wrote:
Hi all,
Ditto... something like:
filter!((a,b) => a.foo != b.foo)
Thank you!
but... why not
´´´
arr.uniq
´´´
thank you, uniq is perfect.
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 13:18:39 UTC, Langer wrote:
Hi all,
Ditto... something like:
filter!((a,b) => a.foo != b.foo)
Thank you!
but... why not
´´´
arr.uniq
´´´
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 13:18:39 UTC, Langer wrote:
Hi all,
Ditto... something like:
filter!((a,b) => a.foo != b.foo)
Thank you!
I would say:
´´´
arr.group.map!(el => el[0])
´´´
Hi all,
Ditto... something like:
filter!((a,b) => a.foo != b.foo)
Thank you!
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 11:28:40 UTC, bauss wrote:
Did you compile it with debug info? Eg. -g
Yep, I use dub for builds which does that by default. Until this
bug I was getting the usual stack traces with my project since
the beginning.
I can't say for sure, but there are some cases I know where you
don't get stack trace (mostly dmd bugs):
- inside module constructors `shared static this()`
- null function pointer call
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 11:09:56 UTC, DanielG wrote:
I have a program that was crashing due to a "Conversion
positive overflow", specifically calling .to!int on a too-large
unsigned value.
However it was simply crashing with an exit code (-1073740771 /
0xC41D), and I was having
I have a program that was crashing due to a "Conversion positive
overflow", specifically calling .to!int on a too-large unsigned
value.
However it was simply crashing with an exit code (-1073740771 /
0xC41D), and I was having a heck of a time trying to debug
on Windows. (Shoutout to the
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 02:41:00 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Apples and oranges :)
ReturnType!(produceS!(42)) is a TYPE, not a variable. When you
apply the brackets, it's not calling your opindex, but rather
changing it to an array. So let's make it clearer by saying:
alias T =
14 matches
Mail list logo
