On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 21:09:14 UTC, eugene wrote:
* The ldc installed by 'pkg install ldc' (the old one), does
not have config module
* Most resent ldc (link you indicated), does have condig
module, and it is exactly the same as condig in most recent dmd
Cool! Makes sense! I though
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 21:09:14 UTC, eugene wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 21:02:21 UTC, rempas wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 19:55:13 UTC, eugene wrote:
core/sys/freebsd/config.d and core/sys/freebsd/sys/event.d
are the same as in fresh dmd, so there is not much sens
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 18:51:38 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 15:42:59 UTC, russhy wrote:
Please keep us updated, that'll be interesting to see how a
pure D printf would look like!
It already exists, it's called std.format.write.formattedWrite,
in terms
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 19:00:01 UTC, solidstate1991
wrote:
Well, it seems like it's an error on the WASAPI side. I totally
disabled error handling (including the switch-case thingy),
then GetBuffer returns with an error code indicating buffer is
too large.
The solution was to call `R
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 21:02:21 UTC, rempas wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 19:55:13 UTC, eugene wrote:
core/sys/freebsd/config.d and core/sys/freebsd/sys/event.d
are the same as in fresh dmd, so there is not much sense to
try it.
dmd (including phobos) is a reference, and I d
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 19:55:13 UTC, eugene wrote:
core/sys/freebsd/config.d and core/sys/freebsd/sys/event.d
are the same as in fresh dmd, so there is not much sense to try
it.
dmd (including phobos) is a reference, and I do not think,
that ldc is ahead of dmd with it's stdlib.
Oh,
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 19:40:52 UTC, eugene wrote:
But i like to use software out of the box and
do not like compile it from source.
Me too! The link I gave you has a binary release with LDC2. You
won't have to compile it yourself.
I do not see any reason for me to do this.
The "p
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 19:49:26 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
If this is a compiler-supplied version, then I don't think you
are allowed to set it explicitly.
moreover... commented out in condig.d like this:
```d
version (FreeBSD_12) enum __FreeBSD_version = 1202000;
//else
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 19:22:35 UTC, rempas wrote:
Yeah, don't use the "pkg" version as it is outdated. It is very
hard to keep a whole OS (thousands of packages) up to date. So
yeah, uninstall your current ldc and trying with the one from
the link I gave you and tell me the output
c
On 12/21/21 2:32 PM, eugene wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 19:13:19 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 12/21/21 1:50 PM, eugene wrote:
```d
version (FreeBSD_12) enum __FreeBSD_version = 1202000;
else version (FreeBSD_11) enum __FreeBSD_version = 1104000;
else version (FreeBSD_10)
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 19:22:35 UTC, rempas wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 19:00:04 UTC, eugene wrote:
Well, I just installed it by
pkg intstall ldc
Actually, this is my first experience with FreeBSD,
I did not have much to go deeper.
That's nice trying new things ;)
Y
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 19:13:19 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 12/21/21 1:50 PM, eugene wrote:
```d
version (FreeBSD_12) enum __FreeBSD_version = 1202000;
else version (FreeBSD_11) enum __FreeBSD_version = 1104000;
else version (FreeBSD_10) enum __FreeBSD_version = 1004000;
el
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 19:00:04 UTC, eugene wrote:
Well, I just installed it by
pkg intstall ldc
Actually, this is my first experience with FreeBSD,
I did not have much to go deeper.
That's nice trying new things ;)
Oh, no, sorry. :)
It is the problem of FreeBSD maintainers to
On 12/21/21 1:50 PM, eugene wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 17:00:06 UTC, Johan wrote:
I think the fix is needed here:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/ad8412530e607ffebec36f2dbdff1a6f2798faf7/src/dmd/target.d#L362-L372
looks like this.
it is a little bit strange, that in
/usr/inclu
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 17:00:06 UTC, Johan wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 10:28:15 UTC, eugene wrote:
On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 21:19:43 UTC, rempas wrote:
I would recommend you to file an
[issue](https://issues.dlang.org/) just so the developers
themself can notice it.
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 18:42:10 UTC, rempas wrote:
I'm wondering what happens in the latest LDC2 version. Your
version is from 1 year and 4 months ago.
Well, I just installed it by
pkg intstall ldc
Actually, this is my first experience with FreeBSD,
I did not have much to go deepe
Well, it seems like it's an error on the WASAPI side. I totally
disabled error handling (including the switch-case thingy), then
GetBuffer returns with an error code indicating buffer is too
large.
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 15:42:59 UTC, russhy wrote:
Please keep us updated, that'll be interesting to see how a
pure D printf would look like!
It already exists, it's called std.format.write.formattedWrite,
in terms of which things like std.stdio.writef are implemented.
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 17:00:06 UTC, Johan wrote:
I think the fix is needed here:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/ad8412530e607ffebec36f2dbdff1a6f2798faf7/src/dmd/target.d#L362-L372
looks like this.
it is a little bit strange, that in
/usr/include/d/dmd/core/sys/freebsd/config.d
the
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 18:35:43 UTC, eugene wrote:
LDC2 stdlib does not have correct struct event_t for 12+ in
/usr/local/include/d/core/sys/freebsd/sys/event.d at all,
only for earlier versions, ie without extension field.
DMD stdlib does have, the only problem is the OS version is
w
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 18:28:12 UTC, rempas wrote:
I would love to see more full (and correct) support for
FreeBSD, OpenBSD and DragonflyBSD from Dlang! Maybe one day..
My interest was kqueue facility.
I use linux epoll facility a lot in my progs,
and just wanted to do some exersises w
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 17:32:44 UTC, rempas wrote:
Yeah, you are right! Please eugene use LDC2 and check confirm
LDC2 stdlib does not have correct struct event_t for 12+ in
/usr/local/include/d/core/sys/freebsd/sys/event.d at all,
only for earlier versions, ie without extension field.
I would love to see more full (and correct) support for FreeBSD,
OpenBSD and DragonflyBSD from Dlang! Maybe one day..
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 17:32:44 UTC, rempas wrote:
Please eugene use LDC2 and check confirm that the behavior is
the same there.
Phobos that shipped with LDC, does not have
core.sys.freebsd.config
So
```d
import std.stdio;
//import core.sys.freebsd.config;
import core.sys.freebsd.sy
On 12/21/21 10:07 AM, solidstate1991 wrote:
> I couldn't add those lines unfortunately,
Perhaps I had typos? Or the code is not yours to modify? In any case,
you should be able to introduce a top level thread entry function and
put the try-catch in there.
> but I do get an exception in a
> d
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 17:32:44 UTC, rempas wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 17:00:06 UTC, Johan wrote:
Please add which compiler(s) you have tried in the bug report.
Yeah, you are right! Please eugene use LDC2 and check confirm
that the behavior is the same there.
I have. S
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 01:13:10 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I bet it's throwing an Error. Call your thread entry function
from a try-catch wrapping function to see whether that's the
case:
// Rename existing function:
protected void audioThreadImpl() @nogc nothrow {
// ...
}
// New fun
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 17:33:09 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
The reason your original isn't working is that indexing a list
of differently-typed things cannot be done using a runtime
index.
I'd say that an inner function + static foreach + switch is the
best way to convert from
On 12/21/21 4:28 AM, rempas wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 08:42:35 UTC, vit wrote:
You can use switch + static foreach:
```d
import std.stdio;
//this print args in reverse order:
void print(T...)(string prompt, T args)
{
void print_arg(size_t index){
s
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 17:00:06 UTC, Johan wrote:
Please add which compiler(s) you have tried in the bug report.
Yeah, you are right! Please eugene use LDC2 and check confirm
that the behavior is the same there.
I think the fix is needed here:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/ad
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 10:28:15 UTC, eugene wrote:
On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 21:19:43 UTC, rempas wrote:
I would recommend you to file an
[issue](https://issues.dlang.org/) just so the developers
themself can notice it.
filed an issue, see
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?i
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 15:42:59 UTC, russhy wrote:
Please keep us updated, that'll be interesting to see how a
pure D printf would look like!
Glad someone is interested! I'm actually planning to make a whole
library ;)
Check my
[thread](https://forum.dlang.org/thread/frjbgaymuxjqpe
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 10:28:15 UTC, eugene wrote:
filed an issue, see
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22615
Nice! Hope they see and fix it soon! Love for open source
Operating Systems!!
Please keep us updated, that'll be interesting to see how a pure
D printf would look like!
On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 21:19:43 UTC, rempas wrote:
I would recommend you to file an
[issue](https://issues.dlang.org/) just so the developers
themself can notice it.
filed an issue, see
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22615
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 08:42:35 UTC, vit wrote:
You can use switch + static foreach:
```d
import std.stdio;
//this print args in reverse order:
void print(T...)(string prompt, T args)
{
void print_arg(size_t index){
switch(index){
static
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 07:08:53 UTC, bauss wrote:
It should at the very least warn people about functions that
may throw errors.
What is "It"? I was looking to make a spec PR, but it already
says here:
https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#nothrow-functions
Nothrow functions can onl
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 08:26:17 UTC, rempas wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 08:11:39 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
I'm not certain I understand, but won't `foreach (i, a; args)
{ /* ... */ }` in his example do that?
As in, if you necessarily must index `args` instead of using a
for
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 08:11:39 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
I'm not certain I understand, but won't `foreach (i, a; args) {
/* ... */ }` in his example do that?
As in, if you necessarily must index `args` instead of using a
foreach variable,
```d
import core.stdc.stdio : putc, stdout;
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 06:44:36 UTC, rempas wrote:
This will not do for me because I want to do formatted output
and I need the index. But thanks a lot for tying to help!
I'm not certain I understand, but won't `foreach (i, a; args) {
/* ... */ }` in his example do that?
As in, if y
40 matches
Mail list logo