On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 18:28:06 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
(And now we know gdc can go about 7% faster with additional
command line switches.)
No, we don't know this yet ;-) That's just what I said and I may
be bullshitting. Or the configuration of my computer is
significantly
On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 18:28:06 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 1/29/22 10:04, Salih Dincer wrote:
> Could you also try the following code with the same
configurations?
The program you posted with 2 million random values:
ldc 1.9 seconds
gdc 2.3 seconds
dmd 2.8 seconds
I understand such
On 1/29/22 10:04, Salih Dincer wrote:
> Could you also try the following code with the same configurations?
The program you posted with 2 million random values:
ldc 1.9 seconds
gdc 2.3 seconds
dmd 2.8 seconds
I understand such short tests are not definitive but to have a rough
idea between
On Wednesday, 26 January 2022 at 18:00:41 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
For completeness (and noise :/) here is the final version of
the program:
Could you also try the following code with the same
configurations?
```d
struct LongScale {
struct ShortStack {
short[] stack;
size_t
