On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:40:30 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> The following causes the DLL to crash on Windows:
>
> Input: immutable(short)* data (immutable because in separate
> thread).
> // Later
> core.stdc.stdlib.free(cast(short *)data);
>
> (short* data is provided by the C l
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:40:30 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> The following causes the DLL to crash on Windows:
>
> Input: immutable(short)* data (immutable because in separate
> thread).
> // Later
> core.stdc.stdlib.free(cast(short *)data);
>
> (short* data is provided by the C l
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:38:50 +
thedeemon via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> some languages like F# and Clojure use this term (often shortened
> to 'seq')
"послед". rotfl.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 04:56:39 +
Casey via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
D has nothing to do with your task, WinAPI does. and you'll need alot
of expirience in reverse engineering, 'cause f... punkbuster shits it's
pants almost for anything. it's a rootkit, and very badly written one.
what you hav
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:31:17 +
Maxime Chevalier-Boisvert via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> What I want to know is: what
> guarantees can I expect from destructor behavior?
destructors *may* be called eventually. or not. in any order. but never
twice.
think about object destructors as "finali
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:50:23 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 November 2014 at 16:15:36 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 11 November 2014 at 16:14:10 UTC, Chris wrote:
> >> Does that entail the concept that ranges (in D) are
> >> homogeneous (i.e. every member/item
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:10:12 +
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> "последовательность" is solid generic term if you are not afraid
> of making mathematicians mad
and it is totally unusable in practice. it's just too long and hard to
pronounce to be used anywhere except a dry boring boo
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:38:26 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 November 2014 at 15:03:40 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:52:55 +
> > Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
> >
> > wrote:
>
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:38:26 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> What does "набор" mean literally? What is it?
something like "(unordered) set of something similar but not same,
which can (eventually) be counted and things can be extracted/added".
like this.
"набор ручек для писания", f
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:35:28 +
RuZzz via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> netstat reports that the socket is in the TIME_WAIT or CLOSE_WAIT
> state.
i'm not an expert in winsock, but did you tried to set SO_LINGER to
"off"?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:52:55 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I was thinking about list comprehension, which is what
> programming on ranges is. Isn't it?
"list" is a good term, but it's already taken. so naming "range" as
"list" will create unnecessary confusion. alas. yet "набор"
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:08:36 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Another synonym is "list".
hm... i afraid that it's not suitable. "list" has a well-defined meaning
in programming literature. ranges are definitely not lists (but list can
be a range).
ah! "набор"! it's short, it not co
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:50:16 +
Ivan Kazmenko via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Is there an "official" translation already? In TDPL, the (very
> few) occurrences of "range" are translated as "диапазон"
methinks that "последовательность"[0] is better, albeit longer. but
nobody will use that ex
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:00:32 -0800
"H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn"
wrote:
> I used to be an Egyptian-braces / tabs-only-indentation advocate. That
> works reasonably well in C/C++, but I find that with idiomatic D, Phobos
> style actually works much better. (Well, except that horrid camelCas
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:27:20 +
Solomon E via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> (There is a dlang page http://wiki.dlang.org/GDC/Using_GDC that
> gives some instructions, including how to compile hello world and
> how to get a .o file, but strangely to me doesn't include any
> examples or abstracte
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:35:04 -0800
"H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn"
wrote:
> I have to say that I *hate* camelCase... it looks really ugly. But what
> looks uglier is a mixture of camelCase and something else. And since
> Phobos is all camelCased, and almost all D code uses Phobos, writing
>
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:07:38 +
Suliman via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> /// How to use UFCS here?
> userName.name.sayHello();
> ///
you can't.
a little explanation: UFCS substitutes only the first argument. and for
class methods first argument is hidden 'this'. so you can't do it in
this way
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:16:04 +
"Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn"
wrote:
> Personally, I don't really care about naming conventions. I
> prefer the camelCase and it seems most D people do, but if you're
> translating another library, there's value it keeping it the same
> for ease of
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:49:26 +
John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Monday, 10 November 2014 at 12:10:37 UTC, Solomon E wrote:
> > I don't trust the
> > DMD Debian package enough to install it, considering it has
> > Google adsense ads in its HTML pages, which is against even
> > G
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:18:05 +
Solomon E via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I do know about how to use GCC and where the documentation for
> that is. I know what .o files and .a files are in terms of GCC
> for C, because there's tons of documentation about that. I
> thought that there might be
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:12:12 +
Solomon E via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I keep saying I want documentation or specifications.
and i keep saying that if you can't find those for you case, you'd
better stick with IDE. you keep ignoring the fact that gdc is a part of
GCC and you have to read G
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:29:02 +
Solomon E via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> The problem that I'm having with this seems to be with GDC, not
> the rest of the D community. The following is a quote of the
> entire amount of information in the GDC man page on the following
> compiler options and f
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:10:36 +
Solomon E via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> If there aren't instructions or documentation on how to compile
> more than one file into a finished D runnable project in a
> correct way that can grow with larger projects, then I'll have to
> take it as implied that
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:13:11 +
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 November 2014 at 14:45:11 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 09:33:29 -0500
> > Etienne via Digitalmars-d-learn
> >
> > wrote:
> >
>
On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 22:17:33 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> eles:
>
> > I am also strongly in favor of introducing an "uncast". For
> > example, in C++'x const_cast and in D's cast for removing, for
> > example immutability:
> >
> > immutable int* p = ...;
> > int* q = cast(
On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 21:47:02 +
eles via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 November 2014 at 19:00:01 UTC, tcak wrote:
> > In some cases, I need to cast right hand side expression to
> > left hand side. While it looks/feels simple for basic data
> > types, it requires long lines with
On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 09:33:29 -0500
Etienne via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I've seen a lot more invalid memory operation errors since the GC calls
> destructors. Letting the GC destroy objects out of order can be the
> issue. We might have to make an associative array of static global flags
>
On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 08:26:57 +
Suliman via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Do you often need debugger when you are writing code?
besides, it's very hard to write code in debugger. even 'ed' is better
for this task. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 08:26:57 +
Suliman via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Do you often need debugger when you are writing code?
almost never.
> For which tasks debugger are more needed for you?
inspecting coredumps.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:51:58 +
Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 11:39:21 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
> > If you're on Linux, you can turn SEGVs into Errors:
> >
> > import etc.linux.memoryerror;
> > registerMemoryErrorHandler();
>
> This i
On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 11:46:16 +
Nikolay via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> > i also developed a habit of writing assert()s before
> > dereferencing
> > pointers first time (including class refs) in appropriate
> > places, so
> > i'll got that stack trace for free. ;-) and i never turning off
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 22:58:38 -0800
"H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn"
wrote:
> Some time ago deadalnix gave a neat (if scary) hack where the signal
> handler overwrites its return address on the stack to redirect the code
> to a handler that operates outside signal handler context, so it has no
On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 06:23:39 +
Nikolay via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I think, it is problem. Dland on windows gives stacktrace without
> any problem. In general it is expected behavior for many people
> from different languages (Java, C#). So from my point of view it
> is bad idea has c
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 13:52:33 +
"Nordlöw" via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 7 November 2014 at 03:22:59 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > crash+coredump is alot more useful than intercepting error
> > and...
> > trying to recover
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:18:24 +
anonymous via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 7 November 2014 at 14:57:56 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > `map` cannot return range with immutable elements, 'cause they
> > are
> > obviously generated by
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 14:32:57 +
Jack Applegame via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> import std.array;
> import std.algorithm;
>
> class Foo {
> bool flag;
> }
> void main() {
>immutable(Foo)[] foos;
>foreach(i; 0..5) foos ~= new Foo;
>
>// compiles, typeof(bar1) == immuta
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 14:32:57 +
Jack Applegame via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
ah, sorry, my bad, 'const' will not work to, for the same reason.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 13:52:33 +
"Nordlöw" via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 7 November 2014 at 03:22:59 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > crash+coredump is alot more useful than intercepting error
> > and...
> > trying to recover
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 08:49:34 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On 11/6/14 11:43 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 22:45:23 -0500
> > Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
> > wrote:
> >
> >&
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 22:45:23 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> In an environment that you don't control, the default behavior is likely
> to print "Segmentation Fault" and exit. No core dump, no nothing.
>
> This leads to unhelpful bug reports, and seeing if you can ge
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 20:13:02 +
"Nordlöw" via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 11:39:21 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
> > If you're on Linux, you can turn SEGVs into Errors:
> >
> > import etc.linux.memoryerror;
> > registerMemoryErrorHandler();
>
> Why isn't su
On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:09:20 +
Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> That shouldn't matter. See: http://dlang.org/exception-safe.html
this indeed matter. and it should.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 08:36:40 +
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> No, it's `~=` that may or may not allocate, but `~` always does.
you a right. sorry, i was wrong here.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 00:05:19 +
"Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn"
wrote:
> BTW one could argue that char[] ~ operator should yield something
> that's implicitly convertable, since it allocates a new memory
> block anyway, but that's not how it works right now.
it's not necessarily allo
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 19:23:06 -0400
"Paul O'Neil via Digitalmars-d-learn"
wrote:
> Thanks for the response. That does work.
>
> Should I file a bug report or create a PR for the docs?
i think it will be fine. and i think that this is more like a bug,
'cause it's ovbious that user wants the same
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:18:22 +
Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Ah - makes sense. It is satisfyingly fast...
the only bad thing is that it trashes /tmp/.rdmd-$UID dir. i wrote
another simple script that is clearing that dir (but doesn't touch
'locked' dirs, as they are obviousl
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:39:13 +
Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> BTW what was the story behind dscript? It seems to have changed
> its name and no longer have so much connection to D:
> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/422be824.6030...@nospam.org
we have rdmd now, which can be use
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:31:23 +
"Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn"
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 22:22:39 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > it's not lightning fast, though, but the code is understandable
> > and it's
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 22:12:30 +
Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
it's OT, but haven't you tried Adam Ruppe's script.d? it has d-like
syntax with influences from javascript, written entirely in D, and has
simple interoperability with D code.
it's not lightning fast, though, but the
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:14:13 +
dcrepid via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Now, I'm used to 'buffer' meaning one thing, but here it seems
> that buffer means something more akin to a 'sink' object, or a
> forced dynamic array type? Is there some way I can avoid dynamic
> allocations?
take a
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:31:43 +
Domingo via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I'm not sure if I'm missing something here but for a tagged enum
> it doesn't seem to make sense to forbid reserved keywords like:
>
> enum CrudOps {read, write, delete}
>
> The dmd compiler are complainin
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:24:13 -0400
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Just as a followup, for some reason Mutex is not callable as a shared
> object, so you have to make it __gshared.
>
> This is unfortunate, but it is the only way to do it right now.
> Because an actual mute
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:24:13 -0400
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Just as a followup, for some reason Mutex is not callable as a shared
> object, so you have to make it __gshared.
that's due to difference betwen plain type and shared type.
`shared(Mutex)` is not the same a
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:11:33 +
Szymon Gatner via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> You have created dynamic array of SmartPtrs.
nope. it's stack-allocated array.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
just checked this with gdc and dmd head. interesting that
a = a.init;
works the same in gdc and in dmd: just calls destructors for structs.
but doing
a[] = S.init
works different. gdc does the same as in the first case: just calling
destructors for all array elements. but dmd head calls pos
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:07:12 +
MachineCode via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> You're welcome :) what do you call git head is the dmd compiler
> compiled from dmd's source code on github?
yes. i'm updating my compiler on dayly basis, so my "git head" is
really "head". ;-)
but i also have alot
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 02:25:50 +0200
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
for those who interested here is the patch that broke everything:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3806/
i simply forgot that i included it for testing purposes, and it breaks
something inside Phobos
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 02:19:49 +
MachineCode via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> It worked fine for me. Output:
>
> > abc
> > abc
>
> Environment: Win 8.1 64-bit (but dmd target is 32-bit, IIRC), dmd
> v2.066.0
yes, thank you too. that was one of my custom patches that broke this.
i already fou
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:41:28 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Yeah, works with git head.
ah, thank you. seems that one of the custom patches i'm using broke
that. i just checked this on unpatched DMD, and it works too.
sorry for the noise.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signa
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:33:13 +
anonymous via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 00:26:00 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > let's assume we have this code:
> >
> > void doWrite(A...) (A args) {
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 02:25:50 +0200
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
p.s. i know how to block using non-dynamic arrays in this case, but i
don't want to. i found this when writing writef-like function with CTFE
parsing of formatting string and spent alot of time looking for bug in
my
Hello.
let's assume we have this code:
void doWrite(A...) (A args) {
import std.stdio;
import std.conv;
writeln(to!string(args[0]));
}
void main () {
char[3] a0 = "abc";
char[3] a1 = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
doWrite(a0);
doWrite(a1);
}
i don't know why, but this code
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 02:07:09 +0200
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> > Thank you for clearing this up. If I understand correctly,
> > __gshared is more of a hack to get C-like global variables,
> > whilst shared is typed shared variable and more preferred?
> yes an
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 23:37:25 +
Neven via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >Mutex mutex;
> >static this()
> >{
> > mutex = new Mutex();
> >}
>
> I have synchronization problems with this one. Even when I
> prepend __gshared Mutex mutex in this case.
ah, there is another subtle thing. 'static th
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 22:53:07 +
Neven via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Why cannot I globally have auto mutex = new Mutex? And why it
> works now when I put __gshared?
this is because 'auto mutex = new Mutex' is not a global declaration,
it's thread-local declaration. all D variables are threa
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 20:16:18 +
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> The documentation specifically says that:
> "Any functions that execute at compile time must also be
> executable at run time. [...] This means that the semantics of a
> function cannot depend on compile time values of the func
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:46:06 +
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Ok, I see two possibilities. The first is to make `prstr` into a
> normal function. You cannot use `stringof` then, but need to
> escape the string yourself. Luckily, std.format provides
> functionality for this already, albei
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:46:06 +
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> The second possibility doesn't exist right now. The core problem
> is that the compiler needs to be able to generate runtime code
> for `buildWriter()`, because it's just a function after all.
but it's templated function, and i
Hello.
the following code is not working:
template prstr(string s) {
enum prstr = "write("~s.stringof~");\n";
}
string buildWriter() (string fmt) {
return prstr!(fmt[0..$-1]);
}
string writer(string fmt) () {
enum s = buildWriter(fmt);
return s;
}
void main () {
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 00:38:37 +
uri via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 00:00:54 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-learn >
>
>
> > we have a nice PR from Kenji that allows the following
> > declarations:
> >
> > int[$][$
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:46:27 +
uri via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On a related note, does the D spec guarantee the following will
> be rectangular in memory?
>
> auto a = [ [1,2],[3,4] ];
ah, no, it's not. this is array of arrays, i.e. 'int[][]'. only static
arrays are guaranteed to be pl
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 22:32:57 +
uri via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was wondering why in the code below f1() works but f2 template
> version called in the same manner does not. Is there a good
> reason from a language/compiler perspective?
>
> Thanks.
> uri
>
>
> ---
> aut
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 22:32:57 +
uri via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
D doesn't try to convert types on template argument deduction. what you
really get from '[[1,2],[3,4]]' is (int[][]), not (int[2][2]). note
that static arrays are not the same thing as dynamic arrays. for 'f1'
compiler doing th
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:00:41 +
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 14:06:08 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:28:04 +
> > Max Samukha via Digitalmars-d-learn
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> &g
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:05:57 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:28:04 +
> Max Samukha via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
>
> um-hm... maybe this:
>
> void Foo(T, U) (T delegate (U) a) {
> // here T is bool, U is int
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:28:04 +
Max Samukha via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
um-hm... maybe this:
void Foo(T, U) (T delegate (U) a) {
// here T is bool, U is int for the following sample
import std.stdio;
writeln(a(3));
}
Foo((int x) => x%2 == 0);
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:33:00 +
Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 23 October 2014 at 07:54:05 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:47:00 +
> > via Digitalmars-d-learn
> > wrote:
> >
> >
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:15:14 -0700
Charles Hixson via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> The code:
> voidgo(ulongrecNum)
> {assert (buf[0] == (fh.sizeof + recNo * buf.length) & 0x7f);
> if(dirty)
> yields the error message:
> ells$ dmd test.d
> test.d(78): Error:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:36:17 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:55:52 +0530
> Shriramana Sharma via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
>
> > I'd really like to know what's exactly happening in that line:
> >
> > auto P =
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:55:52 +0530
Shriramana Sharma via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I'd really like to know what's exactly happening in that line:
>
> auto P = Pair(1, 2).handle ;
object moving. add postblit (`this (this)`) and you'll see that.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:55:36 +
Cjkp via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I've probably badly explained the what and the why. I ask this
> because of this draft: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/e15305cbc32d
>
> Tool: generate a module with some static strings. (used as
> ressources, e.g pictures, tables,
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:47:00 +
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 23 October 2014 at 06:59:16 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > besides, no "serious" language can live without "legacy".
> > legacy is a sign of maturity. ;-)
&
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:29:12 +0530
Shriramana Sharma via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I submit that the syntax for attributes should be streamlined. Shall I
> go and open a Bugzilla item?
hehe.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397
i must ad
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:44:26 +
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 October 2014 at 18:14:54 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > yes, this is the case. i believe that this should be explicitly
> > documented in `scoped` ddocs. documentat
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:03:44 +
anonymous via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 October 2014 at 15:45:02 UTC, eles wrote:
> > D version:
> >
> > { //displays ~A~B~C
> > A foo = scoped!(A)();
> > B bar = scoped!(B)();
> > C caz = new C();
> > dest
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:58:49 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> That's quite inadequate criticism. If you don't know, what
> features generics have, you can't criticize them.
i'm don't saying that "generics are bad", i'm saying that D has alot
more anyway with it's CTFE magic. and ge
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:30:48 +
Lucas Burson via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> ketmar, we meet again! Your explanation is great and that solved
> my problem. Thank you. Maybe I'll try out templates next...
yep, i remember. i was glad to help you. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 00:45:17 +
Lucas Burson via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I'm trying to create a primitive type given a specific buffer
> slice. I can place the uint into a sliced buffer but I'm getting
> compiler errors when using a slice to create the uint. Still new
> to Dlang and un
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 00:57:59 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> consitions
i don't even know what this word means. honestly.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:48:14 +
Kapps via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I like D's templates, it's one of the things that makes me like D
> more than C#. But they can definitely get quite complex. C#
> limits templates to generic types, like List, and for a
> beginner I think that's an easie
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:47:04 +
Solomon E via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> That's unsafe because the implementation might change, and
> pointer arithmetic is unsafe in general.
sure, ponter casting is implementation-dependend. but .ptr is
guaranteed to work as expected. 'a' is just a `struct
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:25:09 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:43:29 +
> Solomon E via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
>
> > `b[0] = 8;` or `b[] = 8;` changes a. Printing the values for &a
> > and &b shows they're dif
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:43:29 +
Solomon E via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> `b[0] = 8;` or `b[] = 8;` changes a. Printing the values for &a
> and &b shows they're different pointers, but (a is b) returns
> true. So I still have more to learn about how it does that.
that's 'cause '&b' taking a
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:51:16 +
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> The problem with template-programming in XSLT/C++/D is that if
> you want to learn functional programming you are better off using
> a good functional language.
templates arent about FP only. yet i agree that Scheme is a very g
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:20:42 +
Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> People think templates are magic, due to their skillset.
and other people keep pointing at languages without templates and
metaprogramming as "good for learing". it's closed circle.
signature.asc
Description: PGP si
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:01:32 +
Kapps via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> no template magic
that's very bad. it's time to stop making people think that templates
are inevitably arcane.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 23:34:17 +
Joakim via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> The desktop UI paradigm needs to be completely redone, from the
> ground up. Current desktop GUIs are too limiting and the
> terminal is powerful but antiquated. The problem is how best to
> combine the two, since one
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 23:38:35 +
Joakim via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
don't you think that we are going in circles now? not that i'm tired of
this conversation, but i see that we get each other's POVs, and have no
more arguments to convince each other. ;-)
i respect your opinions but just don
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 19:42:50 +
Joakim via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> > most people are stupid.
> No disagreement there, but even the smart ones can only learn so
> much.
that's why we should teach kids alot of things while their minds are
"clear" and ready to absorb alot of knowledge. and,
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 16:56:09 +
Lucas Burson via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Wow, your changes made it much simpler. Thank you for the
> suggestions and expertise ketmar :)
you're welcome.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
801 - 900 of 1105 matches
Mail list logo
