On Friday, 26 September 2014 at 01:09:01 UTC, AsmMan wrote:
On Friday, 26 September 2014 at 00:53:24 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:24:27 +
AsmMan via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com
wrote:
It made me a bit confusing. How is the
On Saturday, 20 September 2014 at 22:46:10 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
import core.stdc.stdio;
struct S
{
~this()
{
printf(%x\n.ptr, this);
}
}
void main()
{
S* sp = new S;
destroy(*sp);
S s;
destroy(s);
auto sa = new
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:33:38 UTC, Philippe Sigaud
wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 23:58:19 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
I used https://www.npmjs.org/package/literate-programming (+
pandoc) to do this when writing
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2206555/uniformUpgrade.pdf
in
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 14:55:08 UTC, nikki wrote:
I've been googling without luck, is there a way to do literate
programming in D?, similar to how it's done in Coffeescript ?
http://www.coffeescriptlove.com/2013/02/literate-coffeescript.html
basically me writing comments around code
On Saturday, 16 August 2014 at 22:36:51 UTC, 岩倉 澪 wrote:
void changeState(){
if(nextState != WaitState nextState != ExitState){
auto newState = cast(IState)
Object.factory(game.states.~nextState);
import std.exception;
enforce(newState);
// !!!
On Monday, 4 August 2014 at 12:05:31 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
OK, I get it. Just to be sure, there is no ThreadPool in Phobos
or in
core, right?
IIRC, there are fibers somewhere in core, I'll have a look. I
also
heard the vibe.d has them.
There is. It's called
On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 at 17:59:41 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
// assuming 0 terminated
dstring text = x[0..x.strlen].idup;
strlen is only defined for char, not dchar:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/blob/master/src/core/stdc/string.d#L44
On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 at 18:17:07 UTC, Danyal Zia wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 at 17:59:41 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
const(dchar *)x = ...;
// assuming 0 terminated
dstring text = x[0..x.strlen].idup;
-Steve
const(dchar)* x = Hello\0;
dstring text = x[0..x.strlen].idup;
On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 22:00:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10758811/c-syntax-for-functions-returning-function-pointers
int (*(*(*f3)(int))(double))(float);
f3 is a ...
Ali
f3 is a pointer to a function taking an int returning a pointer
to a function
On Saturday, 7 June 2014 at 19:10:19 UTC, katuday wrote:
I am looking for something like boost::variant in C++
Like this?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_variant.html
This is my attemot to create a compare object. But I don't know
how to use it together with .sort member function
Don't use the .sort property. Use std.algorithm.sort, which has a
less predicate (that should return a bool).
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html#sort
On Saturday, 7 June 2014 at 19:14:01 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
This is my attemot to create a compare object. But I don't
know how to use it together with .sort member function
Don't use the .sort property. Use std.algorithm.sort, which has
a less predicate (that should return a bool).
On Saturday, 7 June 2014 at 20:04:41 UTC, Denis Martinez via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
int ret = jack_set_process_callback(handle_, f, dg);
dg here is giving you a pointer to the dg variable sitting on
the stack. The stack is almost certainly getting overwritten at
some point.
On Saturday, 7 June 2014 at 21:40:08 UTC, Agora wrote:
Why is running slow?
One of the main reasons is because the number of permutations an
array has is n!. Thus the expected runtime is O(n!). That's a
slow, slow algorithm in general. In particular, your array with
length 11 has 39,916,800
On Saturday, 7 June 2014 at 22:01:25 UTC, Ali GOREN wrote:
Thank you. I can not resolve it in quicker time, right?
You might be able to come up with a faster way to permute, but
it's mostly pointless because it will always be very slow. Use
std.algorithm.sort if you want to sort quickly, as
On Sunday, 1 June 2014 at 14:22:31 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I missed the debate at the time, but actually, I'm slightly
more concerned over the remark in that discussion that the new
uniform was ported from java.util.Random. Isn't OpenJDK
GPL-licensed ... ?
On Monday, 2 June 2014 at 18:46:18 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I'm really sorry, Chris, I was obviously mixing things up: on
rereading, the person in the earlier forum discussion (not PR
thread) who talks about porting from Java wasn't you. I'm very
glad to be
On Tuesday, 3 June 2014 at 03:17:10 UTC, Charles Parker wrote:
...
Thanx for any help - Charlie
Well one thing is that you don't need the type parameters on the
this function. You're basically creating a templated this inside
the templated class which is not what you want.
try this:
On Sunday, 18 May 2014 at 18:55:59 UTC, Tim wrote:
Hi everyone,
is there any chance to modify a char in a string like:
As you've seen, you cannot modify immutables (string is an
immutable(char)[]). If you actually do want the string to be
modifiable, you should define it as char[] instead.
19 matches
Mail list logo
