On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 22:01:32 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 17:48:22 UTC, D_Learner wrote:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 14:52:18 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
[...]
The surprisingly, the D-profiler gives plausible results:-
Algorithm1
2921 int
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 22:01:32 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 17:48:22 UTC, D_Learner wrote:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 14:52:18 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
[...]
The surprisingly, the D-profiler gives plausible results:-
Algorithm1
2921 int
Hello everyone . I need advice on my first D-project . I have
uploaded it at :-
https://bitbucket.org/mrjohns/matcher/downloads
IDEA : Benchmarking of 3 runtime algorithms and comparing them to
their compile-time variants. The only difference between these is
that for the compile time-ones,
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 14:52:18 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 14:43:35 UTC, D_Learner wrote:
Hello everyone . I need advice on my first D-project . I have
uploaded it at :-
Current Results for the pattern=GCAGAGAG are as below :-
BM_Runtime = 366
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 14:52:18 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 14:43:35 UTC, D_Learner wrote:
Hello everyone . I need advice on my first D-project . I have
uploaded it at :-
Current Results for the pattern=GCAGAGAG are as below :-
BM_Runtime = 366
On Saturday, 15 August 2015 at 01:13:02 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 15 August 2015 at 01:09:15 UTC, D_Learner wrote:
When writting a pure fucntion involving C non pure functions
like
memcpy() and memset()
Those functions are pure already, and marked so in the newest
dmd (and I
On Saturday, 15 August 2015 at 18:49:15 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Saturday, 15 August 2015 at 18:04:30 UTC, D_Learner wrote:
[...]
Those two slices have different lengths (when shift != 0). They
must have equal lengths, and they must not overlap.
[...]
Am now sorted. Thanks, your workout
On Friday, 14 August 2015 at 20:48:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 14 August 2015 at 20:40:13 UTC, D_Learner wrote:
Perhaps I have to get myself a copy.
you should! There's a lot of little tips and tricks in there.
Am currently looking at your Dconf2015 talk .
My blasphemous talk
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 19:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 19:13:55 UTC, D_Learner wrote:
[...]
It is currently not possible to build an associative array at
compile time and keep it as a runtime table due to the
implementation.
[...]
Am aware you
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 19:54:18 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 19:13:55 UTC, D_Learner wrote:
[...]
I think you may have some fundamental misunderstandings
regarding CTFE, templates, etc. Your code seems to be half-way
between a template-based and a
When writting a pure fucntion involving C non pure functions like
memcpy() and memset() , what could be the way around? Should I
re-write these and make them pure?
The code am converting is as below :-
int ag_cmatch(const string pattern, const string text,
int[char] bmBc , int[size]
On Saturday, 15 August 2015 at 01:13:02 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 15 August 2015 at 01:09:15 UTC, D_Learner wrote:
When writting a pure fucntion involving C non pure functions
like
memcpy() and memset()
Those functions are pure already, and marked so in the newest
dmd (and I
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 12:21:44 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 12:07:48 UTC, D_Learner wrote:
I am having this struct :-
struct COMPILETIME_BM_PRE
{
void initialisebmBc(S,C,I,int k)( const S pattern ,ref
I[C] bmBc){
static
I am having this struct :-
struct COMPILETIME_BM_PRE
{
void initialisebmBc(S,C,I,int k)( const S pattern ,ref I[C]
bmBc){
static if ( k ASIZE ){
bmBc[ALPHABET[k]] = size;
initialisebmBc!(S,C,I,k+1)( pattern
I was wondering how I could change the code below such the `bmBc`
is computed at compile time . The one below works for runtime but
it is not ideal since I need to know the `bmBc` table at
compile-time . I could appreciate advice on how I could improve
on this.
import std.conv:to;
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 19:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 19:13:55 UTC, D_Learner wrote:
I was wondering how I could change the code below such the
`bmBc` is computed at compile time .
It is currently not possible to build an associative array at
16 matches
Mail list logo
