On Saturday, 3 December 2022 at 11:08:53 UTC, Vincent wrote:
Unfortunately even TECHNICALLY stream never was a "range"! It's
more like "queue of bytes", where you can never be sure you
even get these bytes.
A stream is exactly a range, a "range of ranges" if more
specifically. All network dev
On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 02:54:09 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Quite some time ago, it was decided that the *stream modules as
they were were unacceptable and that they needed to be replaced
with something range-based
That's the key! Absolutely dilettantish solution of "profi",
biased
On Saturday, 8 October 2016 at 17:52:25 UTC, Karabuta wrote:
This is how a usable socket in a standard library should be
http://dsfml.com/docs/sockets.html. This is using DSFML (a D
bindings to SFML).
Pity, doesn't exist anymore.
On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 07:37:48 UTC, Bauss wrote:
Wrote some pretty simple sockets that you could use (Based on
vibe.d though.)
That's the point! STANDARD library cannot/must not rely on
bloatware like vibe.d; Only small, native, non-depended socket
implementation.
On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 07:37:48 UTC, Bauss wrote:
Wrote some pretty simple sockets that you could use (Based on
vibe.d though.)
https://github.com/bausshf/cheetah
Hi,
Yes I saw it, but not sure. Does it make sense to use vibe.d only
for sockets. I mean, it like a web framework with m
On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 02:54:09 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2016 01:43:54 Konstantin Kutsevalov via
So, it's simply gone. But if someone wants to propose a
replacement, they're certainly still free to do so.
- Jonathan M Davis
I see, thank you for answer
Wrote some pretty simple sockets that you could use (Based on
vibe.d though.)
https://github.com/bausshf/cheetah
Dne 10.10.2016 v 03:43 Konstantin Kutsevalov via Digitalmars-d-learn
napsal(a):
On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 23:40:10 UTC, Vincent wrote:
Hello, guys!
I was very surprised that module 'socketstream' was deprecated.
Usually if something become obsolete, there is some perfect
replacement!
On Monday, October 10, 2016 01:43:54 Konstantin Kutsevalov via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> Why 'socketstream' was
> deprecated when no any replacement modules? It looks strange,
> like you are removing feature from your app because his code old
> and don't write new code for same feature, and jus
On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 23:40:10 UTC, Vincent wrote:
Hello, guys!
I was very surprised that module 'socketstream' was deprecated.
Usually if something become obsolete, there is some perfect
replacement! But my digging in Inet and forums gave nothing,
but "outdated" examples with 'Sock
On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 23:40:10 UTC, Vincent wrote:
Hello, guys!
I was very surprised that module 'socketstream' was deprecated.
Usually if something become obsolete, there is some perfect
replacement! But my digging in Inet and forums gave nothing,
but "outdated" examples with 'Sock
On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 11:16:00 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 10:16 +, JN via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 09:23:35 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
>
> Why not just create a binding to 0MQ and get much, much more
> than asked for?
>
ht
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 10:16 +, JN via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 09:23:35 UTC, Russel Winder
> wrote:
> >
> > Why not just create a binding to 0MQ and get much, much more
> > than asked for?
> >
>
> http://code.dlang.org/packages/zmqd
> http://code.dlang.
On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 09:23:35 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
Why not just create a binding to 0MQ and get much, much more
than asked for?
http://code.dlang.org/packages/zmqd
http://code.dlang.org/packages/zeromq
http://code.dlang.org/packages/dzmq
or use existing ones :)
Why not just create a binding to 0MQ and get much, much more than asked
for?
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 23:40 +, Vincent via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Hello, guys!
>
> I was very surprised that module 'socketstream' was deprecated.
> Usually if something become obsolete, there is some perfect
Just in case, here are the relevant docs:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_net_curl.html
Am Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:40:10 +
schrieb Vincent :
> 1. Easy to use. No more stupid "UNIX sockets", "TCP types" and so
> on. Just simple as this:
>
> // Client side
> auto sock = new ClientSocket("google.com", 80);
> sock.WriteLine("GET / HTTP/1.0");
> sock.WriteLine("Host: google.com");
> soc
On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 23:40:10 UTC, Vincent wrote:
Hello, guys!
I was very surprised that module 'socketstream' was deprecated.
Usually if something become obsolete, there is some perfect
replacement! But my digging in Inet and forums gave nothing,
but "outdated" examples with 'Sock
On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 23:40:10 UTC, Vincent wrote:
Hello, guys!
I was very surprised that module 'socketstream' was deprecated.
Usually if something become obsolete, there is some perfect
replacement! But my digging in Inet and forums gave nothing,
but "outdated" examples with 'Sock
19 matches
Mail list logo
