On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 06:08:39 UTC, berni wrote:
Sorry, I made a mistake while testing and after I found out,
that it was not available in the documentation at dpldocs.info
I concluded, that it must be a really new feature. But now it
seems to me, that dpldocs is outdated a little
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 14:10:44 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Hm... 2.079.0 had it:
Sorry, I made a mistake while testing and after I found out, that
it was not available in the documentation at dpldocs.info I
concluded, that it must be a really new feature. But now it seems
On 9/20/18 4:02 AM, berni wrote:
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 07:36:06 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
Looks like `Config.stderrPassThrough` [1] should do what you want:
const result = execute(args[1..$], null, Config.stdErrPassThrough);
[1]
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 07:36:06 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
Looks like `Config.stderrPassThrough` [1] should do what you
want:
const result = execute(args[1..$], null,
Config.stdErrPassThrough);
[1]
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_process.html#.Config.stderrPassThrough
In theory
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 07:24:52 UTC, berni wrote:
I need to execute a program and capture stdout, which I hoped
std.process.execute would do. But unfortunatly this command
also captures stderr, which I need to be ignored. When looking
at the implementation of std.process.execute I
I need to execute a program and capture stdout, which I hoped
std.process.execute would do. But unfortunatly this command also
captures stderr, which I need to be ignored. When looking at the
implementation of std.process.execute I see, that I can probably
do this by removing
