On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 18:53:06 UTC, JG wrote:
Any suggestion on how to try and improve the build time.
You could try some of the tools listed on the wiki for build time
profiling:
https://wiki.dlang.org/Development_tools#Build_time_profiling
(intentional bump to aid search results, as
One thing to add:
With LDC you can add this flag ``-linkonce-templates`` to get
faster link time when using templates a lot
On Saturday, 24 July 2021 at 09:12:15 UTC, JG wrote:
On Saturday, 24 July 2021 at 08:26:39 UTC, JG wrote:
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 20:03:22 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 18:53:06 UTC, JG wrote:
[...]
You can try profiling it with LDC 1.25 or later. Add this to
dub.sdl:
[
On Saturday, 24 July 2021 at 09:12:15 UTC, JG wrote:
the slowest parts are in library code
This is really common. A lot of libraries do really weird
things... if you want to keep quick builds it is best to use the
language directly.
On Saturday, 24 July 2021 at 09:12:15 UTC, JG wrote:
On Saturday, 24 July 2021 at 08:26:39 UTC, JG wrote:
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 20:03:22 UTC, Dennis wrote:
[...]
Thanks for this suggestion. Unfortunately this makes the
compile use too much memory for my system and so it gets
killed bef
On Saturday, 24 July 2021 at 08:26:39 UTC, JG wrote:
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 20:03:22 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 18:53:06 UTC, JG wrote:
[...]
You can try profiling it with LDC 1.25 or later. Add this to
dub.sdl:
[...]
Thanks for this suggestion. Unfortunately this
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 20:03:22 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 18:53:06 UTC, JG wrote:
[...]
You can try profiling it with LDC 1.25 or later. Add this to
dub.sdl:
[...]
Thanks for this suggestion. Unfortunately this makes the compile
use too much memory for my system a
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 19:09:02 UTC, JG wrote:
I am not sure how relevant it is but it is a compiler that I
have been writing, not something serious (yet - if ever).
Compile time optimizations are a bit weird compared to runtime
ones - things that would fast at run time may actually be ver
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 19:32:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
And avoid doing too much work in CTFE, which is known to be
slow.
Well it very much depends HOW you do it. Like the ~= operation in
ctfe is awfully slow and wastes a lot of memory depending on the
size of the string, but if you preall
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 18:53:06 UTC, JG wrote:
Any suggestion on how to try and improve the build time. I am
currently using dub.
You can try profiling it with LDC 1.25 or later. Add this to
dub.sdl:
```
dflags "--ftime-trace" platform="ldc"
dflags "--ftime-t
ng
> more than 15GB memory. I tried using lowmem and that did solve the
> memory problem but the compile still takes around 1 minute. Any
> suggestion on how to try and improve the build time. I am currently
> using dub.
3000 loc and 1 minute build time? Sounds like you're using
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 18:57:46 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 18:53:06 UTC, JG wrote:
The program I writing is around 3000 loc
what's the code?
I am not sure how relevant it is but it is a compiler that I have
been writing, not something serious (yet - if ever).
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 18:53:06 UTC, JG wrote:
The program I writing is around 3000 loc
what's the code?
but the compile still takes around 1
minute. Any suggestion on how to try and improve the build time.
I am currently using dub.
Of course one could try to use fewer templates and less meta
programming but that seems to defeat the purpose of using d.
difference between
the two versions. I do link in gtk x86 and gtk x64 depending
on version, and that's it as far as I can tell.
Debug
x86 4
x64 12
Release
x86 3
x64 5
The timings are pretty steady.
Split up the build time in compile time and link time an
x64 depending on
version, and that's it as far as I can tell.
Debug
x86 4
x64 12
Release
x86 3
x64 5
The timings are pretty steady.
Split up the build time in compile time and link time and see
how the difference is distributed between the two.
If
tell.
Debug
x86 4
x64 12
Release
x86 3
x64 5
The timings are pretty steady.
Split up the build time in compile time and link time and see how
the difference is distributed between the two.
If it's distributed overwhelmingly to the link time it could be
t
Why would that be. Program take about 4 seconds to compile and 12
for x64. There is fundamentally no difference between the two
versions. I do link in gtk x86 and gtk x64 depending on version,
and that's it as far as I can tell.
Debug
x86 4
x64 12
Release
x86 3
x64
18 matches
Mail list logo
