On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 18:40:42 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
TBH I wonder if this is not worth a enhancement (or even a DIP)
to have in asm blocks a special alias syntax...
{
asm
{
version(...)
{
alias First = RDI;
alias Second = RSI;
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:40:06 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:00:58 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
no in naked mode you have to save and restore by hand.
So how does one manually generate the .pdata and .xdata
sections?
Are you saying that this is what I
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:20:46 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
no in naked mode you have to save and restore by hand.
Note that in Win64 even if not naked, you'll have to save/restore
some registers like XMMx with x >= 6.
Another question - how can I tell DMD to no generate the frame
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 18:40:42 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
TBH I wonder if this is not worth a enhancement (or even a DIP)
to have in asm blocks a special alias syntax...
{
asm
{
version(...)
{
alias First = RDI;
alias Second = RSI;
//
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 18:40:42 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
[...]
TBH I wonder if this is not worth a enhancement (or even a DIP)
to have in asm blocks a special alias syntax...
{
asm
{
version(...)
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Hi,
I have recently started work on building a VM for Lua (actually
a derivative of Lua) in X86-64 assembly. I am using the dynasm
tool that is part of LuaJIT. I was wondering whether I could
also write this in D's inline
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:24:08 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:20:46 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:00:58 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 21:27:28 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
I am not sure I have understood
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:00:58 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 21:27:28 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
Does the compiler generate appropriate unwind information on
Win64? Prsumably if a function is marked 'naked' then it
doesn't?
yeah about stack frame..., also don't
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:20:46 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:00:58 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 21:27:28 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
I am not sure I have understood above; will DMD generate the
right Win64 unwind info for this
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 21:27:28 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 18:48:02 UTC, Eugene Wissner
wrote:
https://dlang.org/spec/iasm.html#agregate_member_offsets
aggregate.member.offsetof[someregister]
Sorry I didn't phrase my question accurately. Presumably
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 18:48:02 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
https://dlang.org/spec/iasm.html#agregate_member_offsets
aggregate.member.offsetof[someregister]
Sorry I didn't phrase my question accurately. Presumably to
use above with the mnemonics I would need additional mixin
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 15:25:43 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:32:09 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:17:51 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:55:23 UTC, Eugene Wissner
wrote:
[...]
Thank you - I
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:32:09 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:17:51 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:55:23 UTC, Eugene Wissner
wrote:
[...]
Thank you - I probably could use something like this. It is
uglier than the simpler
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:17:51 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:55:23 UTC, Eugene Wissner
wrote:
[...]
Thank you - I probably could use something like this. It is
uglier than the simpler approach in dynasm of course.
How about when I need to combine
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:55:23 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
I have recently started work on building a VM for Lua
(actually a derivative of Lua) in X86-64 assembly. I am using
the dynasm tool that is part of LuaJIT. I
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:00:00 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
[...]
The assembly code uses static allocation of registers, but
because of the differences in how registers are used in Win64
versus Unix X64 - different
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Hi,
I have recently started work on building a VM for Lua (actually
a derivative of Lua) in X86-64 assembly. I am using the dynasm
tool that is part of LuaJIT. I was wondering whether I could
also write this in D's inline
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Hi,
[...]
The assembly code uses static allocation of registers, but
because of the differences in how registers are used in Win64
versus Unix X64 - different registers are assigned depending on
the architecture. dynasm
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Hi,
I have recently started work on building a VM for Lua (actually
a derivative of Lua) in X86-64 assembly. I am using the dynasm
tool that is part of LuaJIT. I was wondering whether I could
also write this in D's inline
Hi,
I have recently started work on building a VM for Lua (actually a
derivative of Lua) in X86-64 assembly. I am using the dynasm tool
that is part of LuaJIT. I was wondering whether I could also
write this in D's inline assembly perhaps, but there is one
aspect that I am not sure how to
20 matches
Mail list logo
