Hi, Dan used the following method for his vector class:
void opOpAssign (string op:+=)(ref Vector3 other) {...}
Why the ref? As I understand it, objects of class vector
would already be passed as references.
Larry
On Mon, 17 May 2010 16:38:49 -0400, Larry Luther larry.lut...@dolby.com
wrote:
Hi, Dan used the following method for his vector class:
void opOpAssign (string op:+=)(ref Vector3 other) {...}
Why the ref? As I understand it, objects of class vector
would already be passed as references.
Hi,
it certainly helps. However I can't help myself, I still thinking that this is
the most complicated, hard read and to understand way to
overload operators. Maybe there is something I'm missing but I can't really see
the reason of all that. Other languages adopts a much
easier approach, for
On 05/03/2010 04:28 PM, Dan wrote:
Hi,
it certainly helps. However I can't help myself, I still thinking that this is
the most complicated, hard read and to understand way to
overload operators. Maybe there is something I'm missing but I can't really see
the reason of all that. Other
On Mon, 03 May 2010 16:46:41 +, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
[...]
Pair opBinary(string op)(Pair p)
{
auto r = this;
r.opOpAssign!op(p);
Sorry, that last line should be:
r.opOpAssign!(op~=)(p);
-Lars
On Mon, 03 May 2010 14:28:20 +, Dan wrote:
it certainly helps. However I can't help myself, I still thinking that
this is the most complicated, hard read and to understand way to
overload operators. Maybe there is something I'm missing but I can't
really see the reason of all that. Other
I'm still really sceptic, especially because they look to me inconsistent to
each
other.
for example
opBinary(string op:something here)(Object other)
and then ther is
opCmp(Obejct other)
which is not template and there is only one for all these operators = =
Did I understand correctly? if I
Dan:
I'm still really sceptic, especially because they look to me inconsistent to
each
other.
Yes, they seem divided in two groups, with different level of complexity, etc.
This is true, and I think this is by design, opCmp and opEquals and few others
are useful in many classes. While
Hi everyone,
is there anyway to do this with operators overloading? :
class Tester
{
double x = 0.0;
double opBinary(string op:+)(double value)
{
return x+value;
}
Tester opBinary(string op:+)(Tester other)
{
Dan wrote:
Hi everyone,
is there anyway to do this with operators overloading? :
class Tester
{
double x = 0.0;
double opBinary(string op:+)(double value)
{
return x+value;
}
Tester opBinary(string op:+)(Tester other)
{
On 02/05/10 07:14, Dan wrote:
Hi everyone,
is there anyway to do this with operators overloading? :
The following code does it:
class Tester
{
double x = 0.0;
T opBinary(string op:+, T)(T value) if(is(T : double))
{
return x+value;
}
That would be great.
Thanks again
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:07:22 -0400, Dan daniele.ni...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks guys, it's more clear now.
Just another question:
are opAdd, opNeg, opAddAssign etc going to be deprecated?
The reason is very very stupid: If I use them the documentation output
is much more readable :)
This is
Thanks guys, it's more clear now.
Just another question:
are opAdd, opNeg, opAddAssign etc going to be deprecated?
The reason is very very stupid: If I use them the documentation output is much
more readable :)
I know is stupid, but a good documentation is important.
Thanks again, I really
Hi All,
I just downloaded D2 after a friend of mine told me about it and I was playing
with it, just to get confident with the
language.
In order to do that I was converting a simple geometric Vector3 class I wrote
in c++.
this is the (relavant for this post) D code
class Vector3
{
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan wrote:
Hi All,
So there's my questions
Why D2 changed in this way the operators overloading?
I saw the the compiler compiles both the functions, even considering this I
assume it's not safe to use the old D1 way,
right?
Because Walter got
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:07:41 -0400, Dan daniele.ni...@gmail.com wrote:
So there's my questions
Why D2 changed in this way the operators overloading?
To avoid repeating tons of boilerplate code.
For example, you can do this:
void opOpAssign(string op)(ref Vector3 other) if (op == += || op ==
17 matches
Mail list logo
