On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 13:51:18 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
On 25/07/2023 1:26 AM, devosalain wrote:
I could be interesting to also compare the licenses of the 3
compilers.
There isn't a huge difference between them.
The frontend, druntime and most of phobos (minus zlib
On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 13:30:27 UTC, cc wrote:
Is there any list of known significant "gotchas" with moving to
LDC from DMD? Any unexpected surprises to watch out for or be
careful for? I'm thinking of all the "features" of DMD that
are now considered verboten by many users (e.g.
On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 09:20:05 UTC, BoQsc wrote:
There are three compilers present in the Dlang website: DMD GDC
and LDC
DMD can build much faster than LDC. In some cases it is quite
extreme, for example the product I work on has a 3.6x faster
debug build time with DMD (well, only
On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 13:51:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
DMD is the point of all D feature introductions, and so
anything that works with LDC should work with DMD.
It's the other way around that might cause trouble, since there
may be DMD features which haven't yet made it into
On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 13:30:27 UTC, cc wrote:
Is there any list of known significant "gotchas" with moving to
LDC from DMD? Any unexpected surprises to watch out for or be
careful for?
- DMD has weak linking for all functions by default (mostly as a
workaround to several bugs). In LDC,
On 25/07/2023 1:26 AM, devosalain wrote:
I could be interesting to also compare the licenses of the 3 compilers.
There isn't a huge difference between them.
The frontend, druntime and most of phobos (minus zlib and curl) are all
Boost regardless of compiler.
That just leaves backends,
On 7/24/23 9:30 AM, cc wrote:
On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 09:29:09 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
There isn't a huge concern with which one you use.
Its quite common to use dmd for development, and ldc for release for
example.
They all share the same frontend, so they really
On 25/07/2023 1:30 AM, cc wrote:
Is there any list of known significant "gotchas" with moving to LDC from
DMD? Any unexpected surprises to watch out for or be careful for? I'm
thinking of all the "features" of DMD that are now considered verboten
by many users (e.g. compiling with
On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 09:29:09 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
There isn't a huge concern with which one you use.
Its quite common to use dmd for development, and ldc for
release for example.
They all share the same frontend, so they really only differ
between them by
I could be interesting to also compare the licenses of the 3
compilers.
There isn't a huge concern with which one you use.
Its quite common to use dmd for development, and ldc for release for
example.
They all share the same frontend, so they really only differ between
them by their glue code to the relevant backend and some modules in
druntime that are
There are three compilers present in the Dlang website: DMD GDC
and LDC
On 26/01/12 18:59, xancorreu wrote:
Al 26/01/12 18:43, En/na H. S. Teoh ha escrit:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:06:38PM +0100, xancorreu wrote:
[...]
I note that gdc is completely free software but dmd runtime is not.
You mean free as in freedom, not as in price.
Yes, both
I don't what that
There is also gdmd : dmd front end that use gdc
On 26/01/12 13:34, Trass3r wrote:
On Thursday, 26 January 2012 at 11:46:19 UTC, sami wrote:
my question is if there thing i can do with dmd only and visa versa?
what the feature of one of them over the other?
what the different between them in
There is also gdmd : dmd front end that use gdc
It's nothing but a perl script that translates dmd command line
options into gdc ones.
actually is a d source file that does more than a simple translation ... as dmd
On 26/01/12 13:59, Trass3r wrote:
There is also gdmd : dmd front end that use gdc
It's nothing but a perl script that translates dmd command line options into
gdc ones.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:34:39PM +0100, Trass3r wrote:
On Thursday, 26 January 2012 at 11:46:19 UTC, sami wrote:
my question is if there thing i can do with dmd only and visa
versa?
what the feature of one of them over the other?
what the different between them in term of inline assembly,
Al 26/01/12 17:15, En/na H. S. Teoh ha escrit:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:34:39PM +0100, Trass3r wrote:
On Thursday, 26 January 2012 at 11:46:19 UTC, sami wrote:
my question is if there thing i can do with dmd only and visa
versa?
what the feature of one of them over the other?
what the
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:06:38PM +0100, xancorreu wrote:
[...]
I note that gdc is completely free software but dmd runtime is not.
You mean free as in freedom, not as in price.
An alternative is ldc, also free.
I looked up ldc recently, and it seems that it hasn't been updated for
years.
On 26-01-2012 18:06, xancorreu wrote:
Al 26/01/12 17:15, En/na H. S. Teoh ha escrit:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:34:39PM +0100, Trass3r wrote:
On Thursday, 26 January 2012 at 11:46:19 UTC, sami wrote:
my question is if there thing i can do with dmd only and visa
versa?
what the feature of one
Al 26/01/12 18:43, En/na H. S. Teoh ha escrit:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:06:38PM +0100, xancorreu wrote:
[...]
I note that gdc is completely free software but dmd runtime is not.
You mean free as in freedom, not as in price.
Yes, both
An alternative is ldc, also free.
I looked up ldc
Al 26/01/12 19:48, En/na Alex Rønne Petersen ha escrit:
On 26-01-2012 18:06, xancorreu wrote:
Al 26/01/12 17:15, En/na H. S. Teoh ha escrit:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:34:39PM +0100, Trass3r wrote:
On Thursday, 26 January 2012 at 11:46:19 UTC, sami wrote:
my question is if there thing i can
Building gcc in general is a pain. It's just a little less painful on
*nix systems, but still painful.
I can't agree.
The build instructions contain everything. Has been straightforward for me
right from the beginning.
I looked up ldc recently, and it seems that it hasn't been updated for
years. Seems that gdc is the only other D compiler that's still actively
maintained.
Please don't spread such misinformation.
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/commits/master
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 19:56:22 Trass3r wrote:
I looked up ldc recently, and it seems that it hasn't been updated for
years. Seems that gdc is the only other D compiler that's still actively
maintained.
Please don't spread such misinformation.
Sorry I made a mistake here:
I confused gdmd with rdmd :-)
On 26/01/12 14:08, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
actually is a d source file that does more than a simple translation ... as dmd
On 26/01/12 13:59, Trass3r wrote:
There is also gdmd : dmd front end that use gdc
It's nothing but a perl
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmx.com)'s article
On Monday, March 07, 2011 12:10:27 %u wrote:
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmx.com)'s article
and add /path/to/unzipped/dmd2/linux/bin to your path.
how can i add path ?
Put it in the appropriate bashrc file
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:55 PM, %u asm...@hotmail.com wrote:
== Quote from %u (asm...@hotmail.com)'s article
i can't install it and i use this command
yaourt -R gdc
i mean yaourt -S gdc
It looks like in the official repositories, we have dmd, but you're
not installing libtango or
On Monday, March 07, 2011 09:09:02 Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:55 PM, %u asm...@hotmail.com wrote:
== Quote from %u (asm...@hotmail.com)'s article
i can't install it and i use this command
yaourt -R gdc
i mean yaourt -S gdc
It looks like in the official
%u wrote:
== Quote from %u (asm...@hotmail.com)'s article
i can't install it and i use this command
yaourt -R gdc
i mean yaourt -S gdc
The gdc package is woefully out of date. You should install either
gdc1-hg (for D1) or gdc2-hg (for D2) both of which are reasonably
maintained
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmx.com)'s article
and add /path/to/unzipped/dmd2/linux/bin to your path.
how can i add path ?
On Monday, March 07, 2011 12:10:27 %u wrote:
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmx.com)'s article
and add /path/to/unzipped/dmd2/linux/bin to your path.
how can i add path ?
Put it in the appropriate bashrc file - be it your personal .bashrc or
/etc/bash.bashrc.local or
i can't install dmd or gdc in arch linux from AUR
i don't way?
%u wrote:
i can't install dmd or gdc in arch linux from AUR
i don't way?
For gdc, which package exactly are you trying to install? On what
platform (32 or 64 bits)? And what error do you get?
Jerome
--
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber:
in dmd:
this the error massage
object.d: Error: module object is in file 'object.d' which cannot be read
import path[0] = /usr/include/d
import path[1] = /usr/include/d/druntime/import
in gdc:
i can't install it and i use this command
yaourt -R gdc
== Quote from %u (asm...@hotmail.com)'s article
i can't install it and i use this command
yaourt -R gdc
i mean yaourt -S gdc
36 matches
Mail list logo
