On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 09:22:35 UTC, ll wrote:
i see a simple dll creation in sample fold, but i am confused
with the command line and i donnot know how to complie a x64
dll wiht a x64 host exe. i think need a clear command line
arguments.
There is an open pr for dub. X64 will then
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 19:19:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 06:46:25PM +, bauss via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 18:04:05 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> In the code below (https://run.dlang.io/is/d0oTNi), ifThrown
> is inferred as un@safe. If
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 18:46:25 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 18:04:05 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
In the code below (https://run.dlang.io/is/d0oTNi), ifThrown
is inferred as un@safe. If instead I write the implementation
of ifThrown out (after res2) then it is @safe. As
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 19:24:17 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
Will do the filing and maybe experiment a bit.
Bastiaan.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19741
In the code below (https://run.dlang.io/is/d0oTNi), ifThrown is
inferred as un@safe. If instead I write the implementation of
ifThrown out (after res2) then it is @safe. As far as I can see,
there is no real difference. So why doesn't ifThrown work in this
case, and can it be made to work?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 06:46:25PM +, bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 18:04:05 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> > In the code below (https://run.dlang.io/is/d0oTNi), ifThrown is
> > inferred as un@safe. If instead I write the implementation of
> > ifThrown out
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 18:04:05 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
In the code below (https://run.dlang.io/is/d0oTNi), ifThrown is
inferred as un@safe. If instead I write the implementation of
ifThrown out (after res2) then it is @safe. As far as I can
see, there is no real difference. So why
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 21:46:50 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/15/2019 02:43 PM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 21:35:12 UTC, eXodiquas wrote:
Is there any way to achive this behaivour with D2?
Yep. Just make the return type in the function declaration
`auto`. You
16.03.2019 1:30, eXodiquas пишет:
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 21:46:50 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/15/2019 02:43 PM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 21:35:12 UTC, eXodiquas wrote:
Is there any way to achive this behaivour with D2?
Yep. Just make the return type in the
This is the set up I have, and I'm not sure how to get the main
function at the bottom to compile. The error in the code below is
that it cannot implicitly convert an inout(C) to a C in the
constructor of S(T).
If you remove the constructor that takes an inout then you get a
"cannot deduce
Hi everyone,
i'm currently working on a small physics engine and I thought it
would be a nice feature to overload the operators of my vector
struct so I don't have to make ugly function calls just to add
and "multiply" my vectors. The problem now is that overloading
the addition and
I'd like to call a executable which works fine on terminal if
called within the bin directory otherwise it give missing issues.
To archive the same on my D program, I did set the working dir
but I get an error saying a .so file couldn't be found. What am I
missing here?
enum app =
On 03/15/2019 02:43 PM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 21:35:12 UTC, eXodiquas wrote:
Is there any way to achive this behaivour with D2?
Yep. Just make the return type in the function declaration `auto`. You
are then free to return a different type in each static branch.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 09:35:12PM +, eXodiquas via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> Vector opBinary(string op)(Vector rhs)
> {
> static if (op == "+") return Vector(this.x + rhs.x, this.y + rhs.y);
> else static if (op == "-") return Vector(this.x - rhs.x, this.y -
> rhs.y);
> }
>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:30:41PM +, eXodiquas via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 21:46:50 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
[...]
> > Or use template constraints:
> >
> > struct Vector {
> > Vector opBinary(string op)(Vector rhs)
> > if (op == "+") {
> > return
On 03/15/2019 03:48 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:30:41PM +, eXodiquas via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 21:46:50 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
[...]
Or use template constraints:
struct Vector {
Vector opBinary(string op)(Vector rhs)
if (op
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 21:35:12 UTC, eXodiquas wrote:
Is there any way to achive this behaivour with D2?
Yep. Just make the return type in the function declaration
`auto`. You are then free to return a different type in each
static branch.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 04:29:22PM -0700, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On 03/15/2019 03:48 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> > Ali's example was unfortunately deceptively formatted.
>
> My editor did that. :)
This is why I don't trust auto-formatters. ;-)
> On my work computer,
It's Friday and time for another post on the GtkDcoding blog.
This time around, it's about text Entry widgets, both editable
and non-editable.
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 09:21:28 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
It's Friday and time for another post on the GtkDcoding blog.
This time around, it's about text Entry widgets, both editable
and non-editable.
Oops! Here's the link:
i see a simple dll creation in sample fold, but i am confused
with the command line and i donnot know how to complie a x64 dll
wiht a x64 host exe. i think need a clear command line arguments.
On Thursday, 14 March 2019 at 19:39:53 UTC, Alec Stewart wrote:
For < and >, would one do this?
I think you'd benefit a lot by reading
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/operator_overloading.html (just search
for opCmp). I bet that will eliminate most of your confusion !
On Saturday, 16 March 2019 at 03:47:43 UTC, Murilo wrote:
Does anyone know if when I create a variable inside a scope as
in
{int a = 10;}
it disappears complete from the memory when the scope finishes?
Or does it remain in some part of the memory? I am thinking of
using scopes to make
On Friday, 15 March 2019 at 23:57:15 UTC, aliak wrote:
Anyone knows how to make this work?
You need an explicit `inout` on the return value of `make`:
auto ref make(T)(inout auto ref T value) {
return inout(S!T)(value);
}
Does anyone know if when I create a variable inside a scope as in
{int a = 10;}
it disappears complete from the memory when the scope finishes?
Or does it remain in some part of the memory? I am thinking of
using scopes to make optimized programs that consume less memory.
25 matches
Mail list logo
