On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 19:26:54 UTC, user5678 wrote:
On Monday, 4 November 2019 at 13:37:47 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Does anyone know a reliable way of having a dub package that
contains git submodules and is to be used as a dependency?
I am looking for a way to ensure the
On Monday, 4 November 2019 at 13:37:47 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Does anyone know a reliable way of having a dub package that
contains git submodules and is to be used as a dependency?
I am looking for a way to ensure the submodules are initialised
before a build.
You can use the
I have this
```
import std.stdio : writeln;
abstract class Foo { }
class Bar : Foo
{
float value;
this(float t_value) { value = t_value; }
}
class Baz : Foo
{
string name;
this(string t_name) { name = t_name; }
}
void main()
{
Foo foo = new Bar(10);
if (/* typeof
On 06/11/2019 6:43 PM, OiseuKodeur wrote:
I have this
```
import std.stdio : writeln;
abstract class Foo { }
class Bar : Foo
{
float value;
this(float t_value) { value = t_value; }
}
class Baz : Foo
{
string name;
this(string t_name) { name = t_name; }
}
void main()
{
On Wednesday, 6 November 2019 at 06:05:25 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 06/11/2019 6:43 PM, OiseuKodeur wrote:
I have this
```
import std.stdio : writeln;
abstract class Foo { }
class Bar : Foo
{
float value;
this(float t_value) { value = t_value; }
}
class Baz : Foo
{
On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 9:16:27 AM MST ixid via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Monday, 4 November 2019 at 20:46:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 07:51:26PM +, Tobias Pankrath via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> Why does the following not work? It works, if I
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 20:28:49 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 19:26:54 UTC, user5678 wrote:
On Monday, 4 November 2019 at 13:37:47 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Does anyone know a reliable way of having a dub package that
contains git submodules and is to be used
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 10:32:03 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 10:31:05 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 10:13:59 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[...]
Yep, it is obvious that my code is wrong. s1 and s2 point to
the same memory
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 12:06:44 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 11:20:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 10:32:03 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
[...]
I meant the example as an answer to your statement, "I wonder
how new memory is
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 11:20:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 10:32:03 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 10:31:05 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
[...]
I meant the example as an answer to your statement, "I wonder
how new memory is
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 12:09:15 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 12:06:44 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 11:20:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 10:32:03 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
[...]
I meant the
My apologies. I'm experiencing a technical problem with the GtkD
Coding Blog site. Today's post has been uploaded, but the site
isn't being updated properly, so the new page isn't available.
Everything works fine locally, so for the moment, I'm stumped.
Until I can resolve this, please bear
I am trying to learn behavior of postblit constructor. Below code
works as expected when I comment out malloc part of postblit
constructor. It writes 4 if malloc part of postblit constructor
is commented out. Otherwise it writes default init value of int
which is 0. I wonder how new memory is
On Monday, 4 November 2019 at 19:53:29 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
3/ variable flagged as `shared` does at mean the variable is
put into L2 cache ?
First caching is controlled by CPU not programmer.
Second not all architectures share L2 between cores.
4 jaguar cores share L2 cache in consoles
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 10:13:59 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 08:47:05 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
value of int which is 0. I wonder how new memory is allocated
without an explicit malloc here. Sorry for this noob question
in advance, I could not find any
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 10:31:05 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 10:13:59 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[...]
Yep, it is obvious that my code is wrong. s1 and s2 point to
the same memory address. I could obtain my desired behavior
with copy constructor. The
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 00:07:40 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 00:04:05 UTC, bioinfornatics
wrote:
On Monday, 4 November 2019 at 22:19:29 UTC, bioinfornatics
wrote:
On Monday, 4 November 2019 at 21:53:45 UTC, bioinfornatics
wrote:
On Monday, 4 November 2019
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 08:47:05 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
value of int which is 0. I wonder how new memory is allocated
without an explicit malloc here. Sorry for this noob question
in advance, I could not find any doc mentioning a similar case.
int* vals =
On Monday, 4 November 2019 at 20:46:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 07:51:26PM +, Tobias Pankrath via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Why does the following not work? It works, if I move the
'prop' out of 'foo'.
UFCS is only supported for module-level functions, as far as I
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 12:31:04 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
Until I can resolve this, please bear with me. I'll keep you
all updated of any progress.
I've been in touch with GitHub support and they're in a yellow
alert situation, meaning (I assume) that service for all sites
hosted on
20 matches
Mail list logo
