Do we have any D dependency scanning available for D in Cmake,
just like the built in C/C++ dependency scanner which is handy,
or do you have to use the option to compile everything into one
module (--deps=full)?
I have some problems when there is a mix of inlining and calling
the separately
On Wednesday, 23 September 2020 at 20:58:00 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2020 at 20:54:51 UTC, Imperatorn
wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2020 at 20:44:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
On 9/23/20 1:19 PM, Imperatorn wrote:
> [...]
send a
> [...]
with timeout.
[...]
Sorry,
On Friday, 25 September 2020 at 15:03:56 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I need windowsx.d but for I don't know the reason is not in
dmd. Someone that have it can send to me? I don't know convert
windowsx.h to windowsx.d
I converting it using VisualD:
https://pastebin.com/jzwKRnKZ
Try it, maybe it works
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 14:23:11 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
No. Modifying a container while iterating over it is, in
general, a bad idea (unless the container is designed to be
used that way, but even then, such removal is generally
restricted), because it often leads to highly
I have a "variation" of "unaryFun" that I name "unaryProp" that,
basically, doesn't require to specify "a." at the beginning of
the expression.
template unaryProp(alias propName)
{
static assert(is(typeof(propName) : string), "Sorry, propName
must be an string");
auto
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 16:39:45 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 9/27/20 6:33 AM, Ferhat Kurtulmuş wrote:
> [...]
Kurtulmuş wrote:
>> [...]
wrote:
> [...]
processing
> [...]
How many flame threads do you need? I thought one image
processor and one flame thrower, no? Even if you
On 9/27/20 1:17 AM, 60rntogo wrote:
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 03:33:20 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
package.d is for your external interface.
Fair enough, thanks.
This isn't an issue with package, it's an issue with a circular dependency.
You are importing yourself and trying alias
This is rather a generic implementation question not necessarily
related to D but I'd like to get some opinions.
I have a collection of functions that all have the same input, a
string. The output however is different and depending on what the
function does it can be ulong, double or bool. The
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 18:39:10 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
How do I defined an AA with class as key where keys are
compared using `is` instead of `opEquals`? Do I have to store
the key as a `void*`?
I got a good answer at
https://dlang.slack.com/archives/C1ZDHBB2S/p1601234030016700
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 19:37:10 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 18:39:10 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
How do I defined an AA with class as key where keys are
compared using `is` instead of `opEquals`? Do I have to store
the key as a `void*`?
I got a good answer at
On 9/26/20 9:45 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/26/20 3:33 AM, 60rntogo wrote:
and this is an error: "struct pack.foo.Foo at source/pack/foo.d(3,1)
conflicts with alias pack.bar.Foo at source/pack/bar.d(3,8)". I seems
like the import in package.d sees Foo both in pack.foo and pack.bar,
On 9/27/20 11:54 AM, tastyminerals wrote:
> I have a collection of functions that all have the same input, a string.
> The output however is different and depending on what the function does
> it can be ulong, double or bool.
The following approach overcomes the different return type issue by
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 21:38:43 UTC, ddcovery wrote:
i.e. checking this Regex expression
`^[a-zA-Z_]*[a-zA-Z0-9_]*[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]*$`
Is there any way to check a regular expression at compile time?
Not really and I'd actually suggest not trying because even if it
did work,
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 21:41:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 21:38:43 UTC, ddcovery wrote:
i.e. checking this Regex expression
`^[a-zA-Z_]*[a-zA-Z0-9_]*[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]*$`
Is there any way to check a regular expression at compile time?
Not really
How do I defined an AA with class as key where keys are compared
using `is` instead of `opEquals`? Do I have to store the key as a
`void*`?
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 18:39:10 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
How do I defined an AA with class as key where keys are
compared using `is` instead of `opEquals`? Do I have to store
the key as a `void*`?
By looking at object.d and aaA.d of druntime, I d say you don't
need to use void*.
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 18:56:15 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
By looking at object.d and aaA.d of druntime, I d say you don't
need to use void*. Object class has required infrastructure
ready for using classes aa keys (have not tried though). Object
class has both toHash and opEquals
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 18:54:11 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
This is rather a generic implementation question not
necessarily related to D but I'd like to get some opinions.
I have a collection of functions that all have the same input,
a string. The output however is different and
On Friday, 25 September 2020 at 15:03:56 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I need windowsx.d but for I don't know the reason is not in
dmd. Someone that have it can send to me? I don't know convert
windowsx.h to windowsx.d
https://wiki.dlang.org/Bindings#Binding_generators
On Friday, 25 September 2020 at 15:03:56 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I need windowsx.d but for I don't know the reason is not in
dmd. Someone that have it can send to me? I don't know convert
windowsx.h to windowsx.d
You don't want to just include it?
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 07:55:56 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Friday, 25 September 2020 at 15:03:56 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I need windowsx.d but for I don't know the reason is not in
dmd. Someone that have it can send to me? I don't know convert
windowsx.h to windowsx.d
You don't want to
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 11:59:49 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 10:17:39 UTC, realhet wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 17:13:17 UTC, Anonymouse
wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 16:05:58 UTC, realhet wrote:
That looks the closes to the python
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 11:30:23 UTC, k2aj wrote:
It does work, the problem is that scoped returns a Voldemort
type, so you have to use
typeof(scoped!SomeClass(someConstructorArgs)) to declare a
field. Gets really annoying when doing it with any class that
doesn't have a
On 9/27/20 3:06 AM, Ferhat Kurtulmuş wrote:
> __gshared DList!Entry queue;
> __gshared bool shouldRun = true;
Have you considered passing messages with std.concurrency.send() and
std.concurrency.receive() and friends? You wouldn't need 'queue' because
all of your threads already have mail
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 10:17:39 UTC, realhet wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 17:13:17 UTC, Anonymouse
wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 16:05:58 UTC, realhet wrote:
The closest I can get is @(S.init.c(9).f(42)) with use of
opDispatch, which is easier to read but still
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 10:40:25 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 9/27/20 3:06 AM, Ferhat Kurtulmuş wrote:
> __gshared DList!Entry queue;
> __gshared bool shouldRun = true;
Have you considered passing messages with
std.concurrency.send() and std.concurrency.receive() and
friends? You
On Friday, 25 September 2020 at 13:37:09 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Given the rate and the number of concurrent tasks, I'd say
threads.
-Steve
Here is my testable and minimal code using 1 extra thread. Thank
you all!
import core.thread;
import std.stdio;
import std.concurrency;
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 17:13:17 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 16:05:58 UTC, realhet wrote:
The closest I can get is @(S.init.c(9).f(42)) with use of
opDispatch, which is easier to read but still ugly.
All I can get is that the
- an identifier of a member
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 10:40:25 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 9/27/20 3:06 AM, Ferhat Kurtulmuş wrote:
Have you considered passing messages with
std.concurrency.send() and std.concurrency.receive() and
friends? You wouldn't need 'queue' because all of your threads
already have mail
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 10:52:58 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 10:40:25 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
[...]
[...]
I remember that your book covers passing messages with send().
Probably I will rewrite it using that mechanism, you are right,
I noticed that
On Friday, 25 September 2020 at 15:03:56 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I need windowsx.d but for I don't know the reason is not in
dmd. Someone that have it can send to me? I don't know convert
windowsx.h to windowsx.d
Maybe it is already available on code.dlang.org?
Is it safe to remove AA-elements from an `aa` I'm iterating over
via aa.byKeyValue?
I'm currently doing this:
foreach (ref kv; aa.byKeyValue)
{
if (pred(kv.key))
aa.remove(kv.key); // ok?
}
if (aa.length == 0)
aa = null;
Is there a better way?
On 9/27/20 6:33 AM, Ferhat Kurtulmuş wrote:
> On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 12:05:13 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş wrote:
>> On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 10:40:25 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>>> On 9/27/20 3:06 AM, Ferhat Kurtulmuş wrote:
>
> Oh, It will work fine if I imitate my time-consuming image
Are these in the Specification or Phobos? I figured them out a
few days ago. These are from my snippet journal on arrays and
there may be more.
void main()
{
int[5] a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
int[5][3] b = [[6, 7, 8, 9, 10], [11, 12, 13, 14, 15], [16,
17, 18, 19, 20]];
int[5] c;
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 13:02:04 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is it safe to remove AA-elements from an `aa` I'm iterating
over via aa.byKeyValue?
I'm currently doing this:
foreach (ref kv; aa.byKeyValue)
{
if (pred(kv.key))
aa.remove(kv.key); // ok?
}
if
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 01:02:04PM +, Per Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Is it safe to remove AA-elements from an `aa` I'm iterating over via
> aa.byKeyValue?
No. Modifying a container while iterating over it is, in general, a bad
idea (unless the container is designed to be used
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 01:59:07PM +, DMon via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Are these in the Specification or Phobos?
See: https://dlang.org/articles/d-array-article.html
T
--
Государство делает вид, что платит нам зарплату, а мы делаем вид, что работаем.
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 13:02:04 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is it safe to remove AA-elements from an `aa` I'm iterating
over via aa.byKeyValue?
I'm currently doing this:
foreach (ref kv; aa.byKeyValue)
{
if (pred(kv.key))
aa.remove(kv.key); // ok?
}
if
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 12:05:13 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 10:40:25 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 9/27/20 3:06 AM, Ferhat Kurtulmuş wrote:
Oh, It will work fine if I imitate my time-consuming image
processing like this.
I think it is Ok now.
import
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 13:02:04 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is it safe to remove AA-elements from an `aa` I'm iterating
over via aa.byKeyValue?
I'm currently doing this:
foreach (ref kv; aa.byKeyValue)
{
if (pred(kv.key))
aa.remove(kv.key); // ok?
}
if
40 matches
Mail list logo