On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 19:30:06 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 19:23:22 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 15:16:33 UTC, Marcone wrote:
[...]
IMHO, your d program cannot have direct control over a spawned
process. However, I
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 15:16:33 UTC, Marcone wrote:
Becouse my program use plink.exe running with spawnShell or
executeShell.
But when my program finish with some crash, or killed with
windows task manager by user, Plink still running. How can I
stop all process initialized with
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 17:01:23 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Sunday, 4 October 2020 at 21:00:49 UTC, ikod wrote:
Thanks, Andre!
I'll split requests as you suggested (increasing minor
version, so that this change will not hurt anybody who build
current requests package for vibe-d).
Will
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 19:23:22 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 15:16:33 UTC, Marcone wrote:
[...]
IMHO, your d program cannot have direct control over a spawned
process. However, I suggest a road map for you, although I am
not sure if it works.
[...]
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 15:16:33 UTC, Marcone wrote:
Becouse my program use plink.exe running with spawnShell or
executeShell.
But when my program finish with some crash, or killed with
windows task manager by user, Plink still running. How can I
stop all process initialized with
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 22:14:53 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 15:16:33 UTC, Marcone wrote:
[...]
This is a bit heavyweight, but should be doable: have your
primary process to start a watchdog process for itself. The
watchdog continuosly sends messages to the
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 15:16:33 UTC, Marcone wrote:
Becouse my program use plink.exe running with spawnShell or
executeShell.
But when my program finish with some crash, or killed with
windows task manager by user, Plink still running. How can I
stop all process initialized with
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 02:05:37 UTC, Ruby The Roobster
wrote:
Following function when called throws an access violation. I
think it has to do with the assert statements, but I don't know
why.
[...]
Okay. I messed up here. It should be: this.base = new atom(...) .
I corrected that.
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 21:15:35 UTC, ikod wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 17:01:23 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Sunday, 4 October 2020 at 21:00:49 UTC, ikod wrote:
Thanks, Andre!
I'll split requests as you suggested (increasing minor
version, so that this change will not hurt
Given
template ScopeClass(C)
{
//...
}
where C is a, possibly templated, class I want the eponymous
member of ScopeClass!(C) to have the same templatedness (both
parameters and arguments)as C.
For a non-template C this is a simple as:
template ScopeClass(C)
{
class ScopeClass
{
I have a Vibe.D server binary that, locally at least, works. But
only without TLS. I want to add TLS to it and test it locally
with a self-signed certificate. I made one with LibreSSL, stored
in `cert.crt` and `key.key`. The application main function:
```
shared static this()
{ import
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 10:41:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 09:40:33 UTC, frame wrote:
Hmm, a question of design. Is there also a convenient way to
pass the arguments to a template or get a Variant[] from it?
Convenient, no not that I know of. You can
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 09:40:33 UTC, frame wrote:
Hmm, a question of design. Is there also a convenient way to
pass the arguments to a template or get a Variant[] from it?
Convenient, no not that I know of. You can use a type safe
variadic function that takes Variant, if you want to
I want to use isDaemon to automatic stop worker thread if ownner
thread is finished
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 02:05:37 UTC, Ruby The Roobster
wrote:
void construct(string type,atom base,atom bonded)
{
base = new
atom(base.name.idup,base.mass,base.electro_negativity,base.valence_electrons,base.electrons,base.protons,base.neutrons,base.pos);
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 11:36:42 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I want to use isDaemon to automatic stop worker thread if
ownner thread is finished
Terminating threads without properly unwinding the stack is
generally a very bad idea. Most importantly the destructors of
stucts on the stack won't
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 08:33:08 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
I'm looking for elegant ways of expressing expansion of
parameterized strings written to a file at run-time. My primary
use case is run-time generation of D code. In the lazy case,
something like
import std.file : write;
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 10:46:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[1] http://mustache.github.io/mustache.5.html
[2] https://code.dlang.org/packages/mustache-d
Thanks
Hi all, I'm completely new to D and while I'm not new to
programming in general, I mostly do web development, and what
desktop development I've done has all been with easy
drag-and-drop GUI builders - so Visual Basic, C# and J# (if that
doesn't date me). I'm trying to experiment in new
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 08:33:36 UTC, Johann Lermer wrote:
or you could use the fact, that receiveTimeout throws an
exception, when main ends (although I don't know if this is the
intended behaviour; the manual just says that it throws an
exception when the sending thread was
On Monday, 26 October 2020 at 23:38:22 UTC, Joel wrote:
```
struct vec3d
{
float x, y, z;
}
[...]
It's not really clear what your question is.
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 07:32:30 UTC, Joel wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 07:17:46 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2020 at 23:38:22 UTC, Joel wrote:
```
struct vec3d
{
float x, y, z;
}
[...]
It's not really clear what your question is.
I'm trying to
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 08:14:28 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 07:32:30 UTC, Joel wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 07:17:46 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2020 at 23:38:22 UTC, Joel wrote:
```
struct vec3d
{
float x, y, z;
}
[...]
On Monday, 26 October 2020 at 23:38:22 UTC, Joel wrote:
```
struct vec3d
{
float x, y, z;
}
struct triangle
{
vec3d[3] p;
}
struct mesh
{
triangle[] tris;
}
// This here
meshCube.tris = {
// SOUTH
{ 0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f,0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f,1.0f,
On Monday, 26 October 2020 at 19:05:04 UTC, Vino wrote:
Hi All,
Request your help on the below on how to store the output to
a multi dimensional associative array.
Code:
import std.stdio: writeln;
import asdf: parseJson;
import std.conv: to;
void main()
{
string[int][string] aa;
string
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 00:46:48 UTC, Marcone wrote:
Because when the main thread is completed the worker thread
continues to run.
Please provide a code example. It's much easier to reason about.
Are you creating a thread from a thread and want the 2nd spawned
thread to be terminated
You could tell your thread via a shared variable that main has
ended:
import std.stdio;
import std.concurrency;
import core.thread;
shared bool end = false;
void thread ()
{
for (;;)
{
Thread.sleep (500.msecs);
synchronized
{
I'm looking for elegant ways of expressing expansion of
parameterized strings written to a file at run-time. My primary
use case is run-time generation of D code. In the lazy case,
something like
import std.file : write;
import std.algorithm : substitute;
const s = q{int $X =
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 07:17:46 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2020 at 23:38:22 UTC, Joel wrote:
```
struct vec3d
{
float x, y, z;
}
[...]
It's not really clear what your question is.
I'm trying to convert from C++ code to D code, see where I've put
'// This
On Monday, 26 October 2020 at 13:02:33 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2020 at 11:14:47 UTC, frame wrote:
Is there any way to get this working? I know, I could use a
known object to feed the arguments and use that instead - but
I want to keep things simple as possible.
As
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 02:05:37 UTC, Ruby The Roobster
wrote:
Following function when called throws an access violation. I
think it has to do with the assert statements, but I don't know
why.
[...]
OT, but why do you have a function that immediately replaces what
you passed?
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 11:30:53 UTC, frame wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 10:41:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
if (_arguments[i] == typeid(ubyte[])) {
auto foo = va_arg!(ubyte[])(_argptr);
}
The same is working with variadic template. I am missing
something?
Never mind, I
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 12:16:01 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg
wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 11:36:42 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I want to use isDaemon to automatic stop worker thread if
ownner thread is finished
Terminating threads without properly unwinding the stack is
generally a very bad
Becouse my program use plink.exe running with spawnShell or
executeShell.
But when my program finish with some crash, or killed with
windows task manager by user, Plink still running. How can I stop
all process initialized with spawnShell or executeShell when
program finish? I another works,
On Sunday, 4 October 2020 at 21:00:49 UTC, ikod wrote:
Thanks, Andre!
I'll split requests as you suggested (increasing minor version,
so that this change will not hurt anybody who build current
requests package for vibe-d).
Will you make a requests-core?
35 matches
Mail list logo
