On 1/4/23 2:27 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 1/4/23 10:48, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Allocations are not necessarily consecutive; the GC may have its own
> strategy of allocation that doesn't follow a linear sequence.
That was one of my guesses. So, I put the objects into a 2-length static
array but
On 1/4/23 13:43, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> You do realize that the compiler is free to reorder local variables on
> the stack, right? ;-)
Of course. :)
I was trying different strategies to catch the compiler (dmd here) in a
single act of 8-byte object alignment as reported by .alignof.
Another
On 1/4/23 11:27, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> writeln("hidden 0: ", hiddenValue(addr, 0));
> writeln("hidden 1: ", hiddenValue(addr, 1));
Silly me! :) Those members have names:
writeln("__vptr : ", obj.__vptr);
writeln("__monitor : ", obj.__monitor);
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 01:20:12PM -0800, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On 1/4/23 12:02, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> > On 1/4/23 2:27 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>
> >> I put the objects into a 2-length
> >> static array but the difference was still 0x20. (?)
> >
> > Are you putting
On 1/3/23 20:01, Paul wrote:
> Size Alignment Type
> =
>17 8 MyClass
>
> MyClassObj1 MyClassObj2
> 27727202000 27727202020
> ```
> If my size is 17 bytes and my alignment is 8 bytes, shouldn't my
> MyClassObj2 in this example be @
On 1/4/23 12:02, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On 1/4/23 2:27 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> I put the objects into a 2-length
>> static array but the difference was still 0x20. (?)
>
> Are you putting the class *references* in a 2-length static array?
I lied. As I could not put the objects in a
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 09:51:05AM -0800, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On 1/3/23 20:01, Paul wrote:
>
> > Size Alignment Type
> > =
> >17 8 MyClass
> >
> > MyClassObj1 MyClassObj2
> > 27727202000 27727202020
> > ```
> > If my
On 1/4/23 10:48, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Allocations are not necessarily consecutive; the GC may have its own
> strategy of allocation that doesn't follow a linear sequence.
That was one of my guesses. So, I put the objects into a 2-length static
array but the difference was still 0x20. (?)
>
On Wednesday, 4 January 2023 at 14:21:46 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 January 2023 at 03:42:28 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
...
My question is: is there a way to enforce UFCS-syntax?
None of your code actually uses UFCS.
This is UFCS:
```
class Foo {
int bar;
}
void setBar(Foo foo,
(Again, there is no problem here; we are just learning.)
Ali
Do I have this much right?
```d
import std.stdio, std.traits;
class MyClass {char c;}
void main() {
auto MyInt = 1;
writeln("The address of MyInt is : ",," (stack)");
auto MyClassVar1 = new MyClass();
On 1/4/23 20:04, Paul wrote:
>> (Again, there is no problem here; we are just learning.)
>> Ali
>
> Do I have this much right?
> ..with this output?
Looks good to me.
While we're here, you can force the class objects to be on the stack as
well:
scope MyClassVar1 = new MyClass();
I
On Thursday, 5 January 2023 at 04:04:39 UTC, Paul wrote:
..
Do I have this much right?
...
First, i would say, add @safe to your main.
@safe void main() ...
Then you will see you are treading on dangerous waters ;-)
Second, to be sure your getting the correct results, it would be
nice if
On Wednesday, 4 January 2023 at 03:42:28 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
...
My question is: is there a way to enforce UFCS-syntax?
None of your code actually uses UFCS.
This is UFCS:
```
class Foo {
int bar;
}
void setBar(Foo foo, int value) {
foo.bar = value;
}
void main() {
13 matches
Mail list logo
