Hello!
I've been test programming win32 applications recently, and since the
phobos win32 library is so limited, I decided to download and test the
WindowsAPI Binding
(http://www.dsource.org/projects/bindings/wiki/WindowsApi). Using the
latest snapshot (as of this writing) I receive the
Hi!
Let me begin by saying, I'm sorry if this is caused of some obvious
error but since I am new to D, I am not aware of all the tricks and
treats it offers.
I am working with the WindowsAPI binding at dsource.org (though I do not
believe this is related to the binding itself). However, in
Thanks for your answer!
Seems like supplying with the file location solved the problem, though I
still wonder about one thing. The imported module is located in
c:/d/dmd2/import/win32/windef.d and I have used this command line to
the DMD compiler: -Ic:/d/dmd2/import/. Shouldn't the
On 2011-06-13 23:51, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-06-13 14:44, Loopback wrote:
Thanks for your answer!
Seems like supplying with the file location solved the problem, though I
still wonder about one thing. The imported module is located in
c:/d/dmd2/import/win32/windef.d and I have used
Thanks for all the answers! Seems like rdmd did the trick.
I don't see why this isn't built in to dmd though, or does it cause
overhead when you are using rdmd? Benefits, Drawbacks?
I've also stumbled upon an additional error with the win32 DirectX
bindings, but this seems D related actually.
Well, I solved the linker error by specifying imports in the
.def file. The pathetic thing was that the def file was invalid
just because I had a newline, or at least it worked without it.
So my final .def file looks like this:
EXETYPE NT
SUBSYSTEM WINDOWS
IMPORTS
_Direct3DCreate9@4 =
Hello!
I've recently been working with DirectInput using the win32 API Binding
at dsource.org. This wrapper has been working perfectly fine until I
started using GUID constants defined in win32.directx.dinput8.
The directx function DirectInput8Create takes these parameters:
HRESULT
Hi!
I've recently been using D to program win32 executables. On the official
D site (d-programming-language.org) there is a template of how a basic
win32 executable is supposed to be. In this template you are supposed to
initialize and terminate the D runtime. If I understand correctly this
Thank you for your reply!
I do not use multi-threading so it is not related to that. Though I do
have located the error. It seems as if the application only hangs/delays
application exit, when I load a texture file with DirectX. To be
specific, the function in this case is
One more thing, would it perhaps help if I supplied a delegate to
the terminate function, since that may output debug messages?
I would gladly try it but I am not sure how this supplied delegate is
supposed to be.
Also want to mention that the initialize functions returns successfully.
Please ignore. Sadly I hadn't learned the D reference just enough and I
did not realize that the base destructor of a class is still called.
Hi!
I've made a two dimensional vector structure (x, y) which is very
primitive, the only real thing that I want to do with this structure
is support for nearly all operators and support for D3DXVECTOR2 and
POINT structures.
While writing this structure the boilerplate code has steadily
Thank you!
How excellent you handled the boilerplate code. Works perfectly fine as
well, except one little thing. I cannot declare this DVECTOR2 structure
immutable because the compiler complains saying this:
Error: variable __ctmp1485 cannot be read at compile time
Error: cannot evaluate
I've researched a bit though I still haven't come up with a solution.
Since the problem lies within (the most simple) constructor, I tried to
modify it for another outcome. If I supplied a generic parameter to the
pre-constructor the Cannot evaluate at compile time message
disappeared but two new
On 2011-07-05 03:11, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 02:44:03 +0200, Loopback wrote:
I've researched a bit though I still haven't come up with a solution.
Since the problem lies within (the most simple) constructor, I tried to
modify it for another outcome. If I supplied a generic
On 2011-07-05 18:05, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I don't want to look like brushing off the problem but having many
constructors make the code complicated. For example, it may be confusing
which constructor gets called here:
auto d = DVECTOR2(1.5);
That might be true. I just did what felt most
Hi!
While implementing and overloading several different operators for my
structure I've got stuck with an error.
As noticed in the attachment, in my opBinaryRight function I mimic the
opBinary (left) operator by instantiating the structure itself to avoid
implementing duplicates of the binary
On 2011-07-07 20:35, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:19:05 -0400, Loopback elliott.darf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello!
I've been programming some miscellaneous code and got stuck in an odd
case. While comparing floats, two obviously identical values return
false in comparison
On 2011-07-08 02:28, bearophile wrote:
Loopback:
I do want to ask though what an alternative would be in this case, to
compare the two different values. You mentioned something about
epsilons but I have no experience within this field. I would really
appreciate an example or something similar
On 2011-07-08 04:31, Loopback wrote:
On 2011-07-08 02:28, bearophile wrote:
Loopback:
I do want to ask though what an alternative would be in this case, to
compare the two different values. You mentioned something about
epsilons but I have no experience within this field. I would really
On 2011-07-14 01:11, Loopback wrote:
Hello!
I've been working on a project where I had to do all memory handling
explicitly because no destructors were called. When I got too tired
of the explicit memory handling I decided to trace what was causing
this error. After hours of code stripping I
Hello!
I've been working on a project where I had to do all memory handling
explicitly because no destructors were called. When I got too tired
of the explicit memory handling I decided to trace what was causing
this error. After hours of code stripping I had gotten myself a
small concrete
On 2011-07-14 01:17, David Nadlinger wrote:
Currently, no memory can be allocated at all during garbage collection
runs, which is where destructors are usually called.
David
That explains it. Do you know when this feature will be available, if
at all?
Here is another interesting case, where
You need to convert the libraries to OMF format from COFF.
These are some tools which can do this:
Coffimplib: http://www.digitalmars.com/ctg/coffimplib.html
Coff2OMF: http://www.digitalmars.com/ctg/coff2omf.html
ObjConv: http://www.agner.org/optimize/objconv.zip
On 2011-07-14 17:06, Danny Arends wrote:
Wow THANX,
Using the COFF2OMF tool at least got me a step further, now it finds and
accepts the lib files,
however, it now fails with the following error:
OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 8.00.12
Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2010 All rights reserved.
Anybody got an idea?
Hi!
I'm having a pretty big mess just because my static destructors are
called before my non-static destructors. Now my question is; is this
related only to win32 applications where one uses runtime.terminate?
The problem is that I am using external libraries, and in one of these
cases you
Hello!
As of my understanding you can write usable c libraries in D by using
extern(C). The problem is that I haven't found any other threads asking
the same question about C++ (since extern for c++ exists as well). So
I have two questions, is it possible to write a dll in D usable in c++
code,
On 2011-07-17 21:45, Loopback wrote:
Hello!
As of my understanding you can write usable c libraries in D by using
extern(C). The problem is that I haven't found any other threads asking
the same question about C++ (since extern for c++ exists as well). So
I have two questions, is it possible
On 2011-07-17 22:51, Johann MacDonagh wrote:
On 7/17/2011 3:53 PM, Loopback wrote:
On 2011-07-17 21:45, Loopback wrote:
Hello!
As of my understanding you can write usable c libraries in D by using
extern(C). The problem is that I haven't found any other threads asking
the same question about
On 2011-07-18 21:59, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
import core.dll_helper; is outdated, use import core.sys.windows.dll;
And also import core.runtime;
Are there any examples covering these new modules, or are the procedure
the same?
with the code I copy pasted
in the other message.
Loopback, do you have Visual Studio on your dev box? If so you should
take a look at VisualD: http://www.dsource.org/projects/visuald
Let us know if you're not able to compile a D DLL.
Thanks for all of your replies!
It seems as if the problem
On 2011-07-19 04:40, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
You have several problems.
extern(C++) only specifies the calling convention, not the visibility
of the symbol. To export the symbol, list it in a .def file or mark
the function with export in the module itself, ala:
export extern(C++) void
On 2011-07-19 05:46, Johann MacDonagh wrote:
What is the best method to accomplish this, and are there any
limitations with this method (do I have to allocate the class with
malloc instead etc.)?
Your C++ class Base is not compatible with your D Foo class. The
v-tables are not guaranteed to
On 2011-07-19 12:39, Loopback wrote:
On 2011-07-19 05:46, Johann MacDonagh wrote:
What is the best method to accomplish this, and are there any
limitations with this method (do I have to allocate the class with
malloc instead etc.)?
Your C++ class Base is not compatible with your D Foo class
35 matches
Mail list logo
