On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 19:16:43 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 14:27:39 UTC, Igor Shirkalin
wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 18:58:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
We can define static array without counting the elements as
following:
enum array_ = [1u,2,3,4];
On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 19:16:43 UTC, ketmar wrote:
yeah. but i'm not Andrei, i don't believe that the only
compiler task is to resolve templated code. ;-) i.e. Andrei
believes that everything (and more) should be moved out of
compiler core and done with library templates. Andrei is
On Monday, 5 December 2016 at 17:27:21 UTC, Igor Shirkalin wrote:
On Monday, 5 December 2016 at 16:39:33 UTC, eugene wrote:
On Monday, 5 December 2016 at 16:07:41 UTC, Igor Shirkalin
wrote:
I didnt count, but its about ten thousend a year, i.e.
nothing.
if you earned nothing using D language
On Monday, 5 December 2016 at 16:39:33 UTC, eugene wrote:
On Monday, 5 December 2016 at 16:07:41 UTC, Igor Shirkalin
wrote:
I didnt count, but its about ten thousend a year, i.e. nothing.
if you earned nothing using D language why do you recommend
it?)))
People usually earn money using
On Monday, 5 December 2016 at 16:07:41 UTC, Igor Shirkalin wrote:
I didnt count, but its about ten thousend a year, i.e. nothing.
if you earned nothing using D language why do you recommend it?)))
People usually earn money using programming langs.
On Saturday, 3 December 2016 at 15:02:35 UTC, eugene wrote:
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 17:54:52 UTC, Igor Shirkalin
wrote:
That was preface.
Now I have server written in D for C++ pretty ancient client.
Most things are three times shorter in size and clear (@clear?
suffix). All
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 17:54:52 UTC, Igor Shirkalin wrote:
That was preface.
Now I have server written in D for C++ pretty ancient client.
Most things are three times shorter in size and clear (@clear?
suffix). All programming paradigms were used.
I have the same text in russian, but
On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 16:15:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
That's what pragma(inline, true) is for. And if someone wants a
different solution that's completely compile-time and doesn't
work with variables, then fine. I'm talking about adding
something to the standard library, and for
On Saturday, November 26, 2016 00:43:04 Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> IOW you want to improve IFTI, so that `n` is inferred from the
> length of the passed argument. That would indeed work for array
> literals and CTFE-able expressions. Any improvement to IFTI is a
> good thing,
On 11/25/16 18:33, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, November 25, 2016 18:20:11 Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
>> On 11/25/16 17:30, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
>>> On Friday, November 25, 2016 17:03:32 Artur Skawina via
enum
On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 14:27:39 UTC, Igor Shirkalin wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 18:58:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
We can define static array without counting the elements as
following:
enum array_ = [1u,2,3,4];
uint[array_.length] static_array = array_;
there are
On Friday, November 25, 2016 18:20:11 Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On 11/25/16 17:30, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > On Friday, November 25, 2016 17:03:32 Artur Skawina via
> >>enum T[N] staticArray(T, alias ELS, size_t N=ELS.length) = ELS;
> >>auto
On 11/25/16 17:30, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, November 25, 2016 17:03:32 Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
>> On 11/25/16 15:51, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
>>> On Friday, November 25, 2016 14:27:39 Igor Shirkalin via
>>>
On Friday, November 25, 2016 08:26:11 Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> and opening an enhancement request to make the compiler smart enough that
>
> auto arr = staticArray!ubyte([1, 2, 3, 4]);
>
> would work.
Opened: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16779
And regardless
On Friday, November 25, 2016 17:03:32 Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On 11/25/16 15:51, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > On Friday, November 25, 2016 14:27:39 Igor Shirkalin via
> > Digitalmars-d-learn>
> > wrote:
> >> I think you may write it (I mean actual D)
On Friday, November 25, 2016 15:59:48 Igor Shirkalin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 14:51:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> > auto arr = staticArray!ubyte([1, 2, 3, 4]);
> >
> > doesn't compile either. The most straightforward
> > implementations are something like
>
>
On 11/25/16 15:51, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, November 25, 2016 14:27:39 Igor Shirkalin via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
>> I think you may write it (I mean actual D) with using some
>> template like this:
>>
>> auto array = static_array!uint(1, 2, 3, 4)
>>
>>
On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 07:17:18 UTC, MGW wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 18:54:35 UTC, Igor Shirkalin
wrote:
Igor, is the good Russian-speaking forum
https://vk.com/vk_dlang.
There are articles on GUI and other aspects of dlang.
Thank you, I'll tale a look at it for sure.
On Friday, 25 November 2016 at 14:51:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I think you may write it (I mean actual D) with using some
template like this:
auto array = static_array!uint(1, 2, 3, 4)
Could you please help to write down this template in the best
and clear manner?
That's easy. The
On Friday, November 25, 2016 14:27:39 Igor Shirkalin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 18:58:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> >> We can define static array without counting the elements as
> >> following:
> >>
> >>
> >> enum array_ = [1u,2,3,4];
> >> uint[array_.length]
On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 18:58:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
We can define static array without counting the elements as
following:
enum array_ = [1u,2,3,4];
uint[array_.length] static_array = array_;
there are workarounds, of course. yet i'll take mine `uint[$] a
= [1u,2,3,4];` over that
On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 18:54:35 UTC, Igor Shirkalin
wrote:
Igor, is the good Russian-speaking forum
https://vk.com/vk_dlang.
There are articles on GUI and other aspects of dlang.
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 17:54:52 UTC, Igor Shirkalin wrote:
The simpler - the better.
After reading "D p.l." by A.Alexandrescu two years ago I have
found my past dream. It's theory to start with. That book
should be read at least two times especially if you have
On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 19:15:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
It's nice, but it's non-standard. So, it seems to me that using
it is just going to lead to problems like you ran into in this
thread where you posted an example that wasn't valid D, and
it'll make you that much more
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 18:58:55 ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 18:54:35 UTC, Igor Shirkalin
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 22 November 2016 at 00:08:05 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> >> On Monday, 21 November 2016 at 23:49:27 UTC, burjui wrote:
> >>> Though I
On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 18:54:35 UTC, Igor Shirkalin
wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 November 2016 at 00:08:05 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Monday, 21 November 2016 at 23:49:27 UTC, burjui wrote:
Though I would argue that it's better to use '_' instead of
'$' to denote deduced fixed size, it seems
On Tuesday, 22 November 2016 at 00:08:05 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Monday, 21 November 2016 at 23:49:27 UTC, burjui wrote:
Though I would argue that it's better to use '_' instead of
'$' to denote deduced fixed size, it seems more obvious to me:
int[_] array = [ 1, 2, 3 ];
alas, `_` is valid
Dne 21.11.2016 v 13:44 Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn napsal(a):
... it's easy enough to just create a
template to do the same thing, it's not worth adding to the language.
That's a problem. I belive there is a lot of things which are easy to
add by some kind of magic (template or
On Monday, 21 November 2016 at 12:44:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
(it might have even had a PR which was rejected), and
presumably, Ketmar added it to his own compiler, because he
liked the feature.
exactly. it is the old patch from Kenji. the patch even survived
C++ -> D transition, 'cause
On Monday, 21 November 2016 at 23:49:27 UTC, burjui wrote:
Though I would argue that it's better to use '_' instead of '$'
to denote deduced fixed size, it seems more obvious to me:
int[_] array = [ 1, 2, 3 ];
alas, `_` is valid identifier, so `enum _ = 42; int[_] a;` is
perfectly valid.
On Monday, 21 November 2016 at 12:44:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Someone could create a DIP for it though and argue for it. If
they did that convincingly enough, maybe it would become a
feature. I suspect that the response will be though that since
it's easy enough to just create a
On Monday, 21 November 2016 at 12:42:34 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
That was a proposal for D that was rejected in the last moment
by Andrei. My guess is that ketmar's modified dmd has that
feature implemented.
exactly. it is handy feature, so i used to it. and it slept into
code (i usually test
On Monday, 21 November 2016 at 12:44:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, November 21, 2016 12:08:30 Patric Dexheimer via
Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
No. D doesn't have that, though it's easy enough to do the same
thing with a helper template. However, Ketmar seems to like to
use his own
On Monday, November 21, 2016 12:08:30 Patric Dexheimer via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 00:47:00 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> > On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 00:28:36 UTC, Stefan Koch
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Please don't post non-d.
> >
> > it slipped accidentally, sorry.
On Monday, 21 November 2016 at 12:08:30 UTC, Patric Dexheimer
wrote:
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 00:47:00 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 00:28:36 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
Please don't post non-d.
it slipped accidentally, sorry. ;-)
for OP: `uint[2] a = [42, 69];` is
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 00:47:00 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 00:28:36 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
Please don't post non-d.
it slipped accidentally, sorry. ;-)
for OP: `uint[2] a = [42, 69];` is the correct syntax.
"uint[$] a = [42, 69];"
haha for a moment I
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 20:54:32 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 17:12:13 UTC, Igor Shirkalin
wrote:
string s = "%(%s, %)".format(a);
writefln(s);
}
Accepted.
Is it really needed to call 'writefln'? I mean 'f'.
no. it's a leftover from the code without
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 17:12:13 UTC, Igor Shirkalin
wrote:
string s = "%(%s, %)".format(a);
writefln(s);
}
Accepted.
Is it really needed to call 'writefln'? I mean 'f'.
no. it's a leftover from the code without format. it originally
was `writefln("%(%s, %)", a);`, but i wanted
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 00:28:36 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
import std.stdio;
import std.format;
void main () {
uint[$] a = [42, 69];
string s = "%(%s, %)".format(a);
writefln(s);
}
Please don't post non-d.
People might use it an then complain that it does not work.
Let these
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 21:28:44 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 20:31:57 UTC, Igor Shirkalin
wrote:
After 2 hours of brain breaking (as D newbie) I have come to:
uint_array.map!(v=>"%x".format(v)).join(", ")
Why 2 hours? Because I have started with 'joiner' function
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 00:28:36 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Please don't post non-d.
it slipped accidentally, sorry. ;-)
for OP: `uint[2] a = [42, 69];` is the correct syntax.
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 21:28:44 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 20:31:57 UTC, Igor Shirkalin
wrote:
After 2 hours of brain breaking (as D newbie) I have come to:
uint_array.map!(v=>"%x".format(v)).join(", ")
Why 2 hours? Because I have started with 'joiner' function
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 20:31:57 UTC, Igor Shirkalin wrote:
After 2 hours of brain breaking (as D newbie) I have come to:
uint_array.map!(v=>"%x".format(v)).join(", ")
Why 2 hours? Because I have started with 'joiner' function and
aftewords found out the 'join'.
To my mind there is
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 19:47:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:43:49AM -0800, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...]
Yes, I meant 'sentiments' as in опыта, not as in
сентметальность. :-)
[...]
Sorry, typo. I meant сентиментальности. But I think you
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 19:47:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Yes, I meant 'sentiments' as in опыта, not as in
сентметальность. :-)
[...]
Sorry, typo. I meant сентиментальности. But I think you
understand what I mean. :-)
Oh, I think you understand what you think what I mean :)
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 19:43:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I was a little bit afraid of my missunderstanding in terms of
sentiments. You've got me right (I don't quite feel the
meaning of that in these non-cyrillic letters:). But what I
understand is the path you have walked and what I
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 19:43:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I was a little bit afraid of my missunderstanding in terms of
sentiments. You've got me right (I don't quite feel the
meaning of that in these non-cyrillic letters:). But what I
understand is the path you have walked and what I
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:43:49AM -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> Yes, I meant 'sentiments' as in опыта, not as in сентметальность. :-)
[...]
Sorry, typo. I meant сентиментальности. But I think you understand what
I mean. :-)
T
--
The most powerful one-line C
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 07:26:56PM +, Igor Shirkalin via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 18:14:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Welcome, Igor!
> Hello, Teoh!
> >
> > Your sentiments reflect mine years ago when I first discovered D. I
> > came from a C/C++/Perl
On Friday, 18 November 2016 at 18:14:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Welcome, Igor!
Hello, Teoh!
Your sentiments reflect mine years ago when I first discovered
D. I came from a C/C++/Perl background. It was also Andrei's
book that got me started; in those early days documentation was
scant and
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 05:54:52PM +, Igor Shirkalin via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> The simpler - the better.
> After reading "D p.l." by A.Alexandrescu two years ago I have found my
> past dream. It's theory to start with. That book should be read at
> least two times especially if you
51 matches
Mail list logo
