On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 06:28:21 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 20 September 2014 22:39, Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
There was a recent video[1] by Jonathan Blow about what he
would want in a
programming language designed specifically for game
development. Go, Rust,
a
don't use crap - use
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ovgoajvboltrtciqf...@forum.dlang.org
it is great. works for 64bit!!
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 12:26:48 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 10:35:25 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Dgui is very good,but what stat
On Wednesday, 28 January 2015 at 12:02:25 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
GUI does not belong to Phobos.
That's the only reason I use Java instead of D. If GUI is not in
phobos, it has no guaranteed support. Of course this is because I
only create GUI desktop application.
Apparently this is only my iss
I don't know, you sound like a perfectionist to me, like most of
other community members. I can only give examples from my
experience.
I am a controls engineer in my current day job, and I do SW
coding in my free time (like couple of hours per week). In the
past, I changed my D GUI libs from
I write lot of small utilities on Windows and prefer to have a
gui.
Gtkd is nice. Glade is awsome. but the runtime dlls are about
20mb, too much for a 1mb tool. For some reason the theming on
Windows didnt work well for me.
Dwt is nice, but no glade like gui editor. when using dwt, I
build
It's all about removing resistance and raising the level of
professionalism. D isn't a hobby project and shouldn't act
like one. This is an obvious barrier that's worth removing. In
this day and age of rampant actively dangerous software, it's
an obvious improvement to sign it and make the st
On Monday, 3 September 2018 at 19:31:58 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Because they can't hold a candle to vim. As far as text editing
goes, there simply is no comparison.
All these arguments, especially the above, makes me sad.
May be this is the nature of open source that volunteers will
Is there a list of such quirks or gotchas in dlang?
The ones I know of are
1. Implicit conversion from double to float
2. Integer division results in integer result truncation the
fractional part.
3. ??
When i hear Go, you hear uniformal, fast, simple syntax
language.
When i hear Rust, you hear safe, manual memory management.
When i hear D, you hear ... ... ... ...
I usually hear awesome meta-programming and ranges.
I think D community had put lot of effort in making these things
work becaus
It all started here
http://forum.dlang.org/post/evxhpxfkeorrrkhqz...@forum.dlang.org
:-)
... or one of the posts in that thread, I mean.
Hi!
Thanks for the effort you've put in this.
I am having problems with building with LDC 0.14.0. DMD 2.066.0
seems to work fine (all unit tests pass). Do you have any ideas
why?
I am using Ubuntu 3.10 (Linux 3.11.0-15-generic x86_64).
Master was at 6a9f8e62e456c3601fe8ff2e1fbb640f38793d08.
$
...
I am using Ubuntu 3.10 (Linux 3.11.0-15-generic x86_64).
...
I meant Ubuntu 13.10 :D
I tried using "-disable-linker-strip-dead", but it had no effect.
From the error messages it seems the problem is compile-time and
not link-time...
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 07:01:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 25/08/14 21:49, simendsjo wrote:
So ldc can remove quite a substantial amo
On Wednesday, 6 May 2015 at 18:26:27 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/bb531344(v=vs.140).aspx
I'm sharing this specifically so we can have an unproductive
flamewar about whether breaking changes in D are sometimes
worth it or if they are holding D back
On 4/16/2018 3:27 PM, Ivan Trombley wrote:
I want to revisit this issue.
Building 64 bit on Linux, release or debug, is fast. However, building
64 bit release on Windows 10 is super slow. I have a cross platform app
that uses gtk-d. Today, I updated DMD to 2.079.1 and the gtk-d lib to
3.8.0.
On 5/8/2018 10:50 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
I was searching for zmq-d on code.dlang.org to find the git page for it
( to differentiate it from the other ama wrappers) and was greeted with
500 - Internal Server Error
Internal Server Error
Internal error information:
vibe.db.mongo.connection.M
On 5/15/2018 10:17 AM, aliak wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 13:16:55 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
The way you use the word "leak" make is sounds that this is
unintentional, while in reality it is intentional by design. That why
reading the specification is important!
Alexander
Ya I guess you
On 05/15/2018 04:05 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 12:21:23 Dlang User via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 5/15/2018 10:17 AM, aliak wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 13:16:55 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
The way you use the word "leak" make is sounds that this is
uni
On 5/22/2018 10:03 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 13:30:02 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 13:11:00 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Thursday, 17 May 2018 at 03:28:33 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
digger build --model=64
If you don't have Digger yet, yo
On 5/23/2018 12:42 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 17:35:28 UTC, Dlang User wrote:
I too am looking for 64-bit on Windows 10. Not just DMD but ideally
everything.
When I try the command exactly as above, or a slightly modified
version (on a second run show after th
On 5/23/2018 3:20 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 20:17:04 UTC, Dlang User wrote:
I tried adding bootstrap option for 64 bit:
digger -c build.components.dmd.dmdModel=64 -c
build.components.dmd.bootstrap.ver=v2.075.0 build --model=64 v2.080.0
Which didn't work (tota
I've used D's GC with DDMD. It works*, but you're trading
better memory usage for worse allocation speed. It's quite
possible we could add a switch to ddmd to enable the GC.
As a random d-user (who cares about perf/speed and just happened
to read this) a switch sounds VERY good to me. I don'
TL;DR
Would want to run your code 8x - 32x faster? SPMD (Single Program
Multiple Data) on SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data) might
be the answer you're looking for.
It works by running multiple iterations/instances of your loop at
once on SIMD and the compiler could do that automatically f
On Saturday, 7 July 2018 at 13:26:10 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Friday, 6 July 2018 at 23:08:27 UTC, Random D user wrote:
Especially, since D doesn't even attempt any
auto-vectorization (poor results and difficult to implement)
and manual loops are quite tedious to write (even std.simd
fa
On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 18:09:58 UTC, Ali wrote:
On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 17:27:03 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:14:51PM +, Rion via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
https://www.quora.com/What-is-your-review-of-D-programming-language
It seems that D still has the GC being
On Friday, 13 October 2017 at 13:14:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I don't know what the expectations of a Windows user are.
In my exprience 80% of mainly Windows devs (in professional
environment) use Visual Studio + plugins (e.g. Visual
Assist/Dpack etc.). Most of the remaining 20% use
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 02:20:31 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 00:26:19 UTC, bauss wrote:
return foo ?? null; would be so much easier.
return getOr(foo, null);
I guess with UFCS you could get:
return foo.PP(null); // vs.
return foo ?? null;
:D
On Friday, 5 January 2018 at 03:28:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/4/2018 2:34 AM, Mike Franklin wrote:
Walter seems to pop in daily, and occasionally reviews PRs,
and his PRs of late are mostly just refactorings rather than
fixing difficult bugs.
There's a lot of technical debt I've been tr
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 23:49:29 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
We would love to change the defaults, but unfortunately that
boat has already sailed a long time ago.
What if d had a -safe-defaults switch? It should be ok, since
safe is stricter than unsafe right?
This way old/existing code
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 22:11:19 UTC, Namespace wrote:
nuDist - in D you can program as free as you want. ;)
void main()
body
{
asm
{
naked;
}
}
On Sunday, 14 May 2017 at 15:39:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/12/2017 9:17 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
The first stage of the formal review for DIP 1003 [1], "Remove
body as a
Keyword", is now underway.
A combination of Options 1 and 2:
1. Introduce 'function' as an alternative to 'body'.
H
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 14:17:26 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
1) Add the opposite attributes: `impure`, `throws`, `@gc`, etc.
2) Add the module version thing that changes defaults on request
3) imagine more potential going forward
I dislike doubling the keywords by having a 'not' case for each.
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 14:32:28 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
With 2.075's release near, now would be a good time to decide
on a nice color palette that looks fine on most terminals. So,
please vote:
What ever you do, please don't use extreme high intensity colors
like red(255,0,0), gre
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 22:17:00 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 18:47:18 UTC, Random D user wrote:
Anyway, I think we could just have a compile time switch for
defaults.
Imagine having n libraries with pairwise different required
defaults used in your application. S
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 18:42:45 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 18:41:00 UTC, Random D user wrote:
What ever you do, please don't use extreme high intensity
colors like red(255,0,0), green (0,255,0) or blue (0,0,255).
That's up to the terminal (or your configura
I just got curious, after reading the GC analysis blog post. What
kind of features people generally would want for the GC (in the
distant murky future of 1999)?
Here's some of my nice to haves:
1. Thread local GCs. D is by default thread local, so it kind of
would make sense and goodbye stop
On Friday, 30 June 2017 at 06:14:41 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 6/29/2017 10:19 PM, Random D user wrote:
2. Composable custom memory block GC. The ability to mallocate
128MB
memory block and create a new GC instance to manage that
block. It would
only need to scan that 128MB block and not w
On Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 12:18:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/8/17 7:07 AM, bachmeier wrote:
On Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 10:15:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Having an @noreturn attribute will take care of that:
@noreturn void ThisFunctionExits();
Why should this be an attribut
On Saturday, 22 July 2017 at 10:44:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
1. Fix it so it matches C, as has been generally promised.
Fixing it will break existing code such as:
If D was my language I'd fix it, since it's a bug.
D's fluidity and effortlessness comes from a lot of small
compounding conve
On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 19:09:40 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
I never seem to use them for anything, has anyone else done
anything interesting with them?
What a cool thread.
This is very valuable info for new(ish) d users.
It's often the case for language features that they are just
branded cool.
On Friday, 28 August 2015 at 21:59:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/28/2015 4:18 AM, Temtaime wrote:
Are you sure that ONE Walter can achieve what they done ?
People told me I couldn't write a C compiler, then told me I
couldn't write a C++ compiler. I'm still the only person who
has ever i
On Friday, 15 January 2016 at 05:56:37 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
- A specific list of things that can be improved
I too like the current soft dark theme of the forum (and website).
Would it be possible to have optional dark theme in the forum
settings?
I wish the main website would hav
On Monday, 12 September 2016 at 04:14:27 UTC, Manu wrote:
I think I'm about as happy with my colour lib as I'm going to
be. It really needs reviews.
- Manu
Hi. I'm just a random forum lurker, but here's my feedback.
It needs more docs/examples for the basic usage cases (i.e. how
to skip doc
On Tuesday, 13 September 2016 at 01:05:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
Can you describe what you perceive to be hard?
Well, I just skimmed through the docs and I didn't look at the
code, so that sense it was an "honest" view for phobos proposal.
Also I was trying to convey that based on the docs it "l
On Tuesday, 13 September 2016 at 02:00:44 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 13 September 2016 at 07:00, Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Am Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:37:22 +1000
schrieb Manu via Digitalmars-d :
Alright, but hybrid gamma is really not something that can be
googled. Or rather I end up at Toyota
On Thursday, 6 October 2016 at 14:53:52 UTC, Manu wrote:
I've done another pass incorporating prior feedback, mostly
focusing on documentation.
Just a quick minor comment on:
A8 RGB!("a",ubyte,false,0) 8 bit alpha-only color type.
-->
Reads like, "False what ???". Also "What is 0 ???".
-->
Ho
46 matches
Mail list logo
