On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 11:28:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 10:57:23 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 10:43:24 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 August 2018 at 04:53:59 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 23:27:09 UTC, Nick
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 10:57:23 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 10:43:24 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 August 2018 at 04:53:59 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 23:27:09 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
[...]
Honestly C++ did OOP somewhat right,
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 10:43:24 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 August 2018 at 04:53:59 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 23:27:09 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
[...]
Honestly C++ did OOP somewhat right, because it wasn't forced
upon you, but C++ itself has design
On Wednesday, 29 August 2018 at 04:53:59 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 23:27:09 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
[...]
Honestly C++ did OOP somewhat right, because it wasn't forced
upon you, but C++ itself has design issues, that I think D has
solved very well.
D does OOP
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 07:01:11 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 08/29/2018 12:53 AM, bauss wrote:
Honestly C++ did OOP somewhat right, because it wasn't forced
upon you, but C++ itself has design issues, that I think D has
solved very well.
D does OOP better than C++, but
On 08/29/2018 12:53 AM, bauss wrote:
Honestly C++ did OOP somewhat right, because it wasn't forced upon you,
but C++ itself has design issues, that I think D has solved very well.
D does OOP better than C++, but D is still missing some very common OOP
patterns.
See:
On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 23:27:09 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 21:57:28 UTC, solidstate1991
wrote:
Thanks to my education, I first wanted to approach every
problems in programming from an object-oriented viewpoint,
since that was the only one we were taught.
On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 21:57:28 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote:
Thanks to my education, I first wanted to approach every
problems in programming from an object-oriented viewpoint,
since that was the only one we were taught.
Sounds like you were more or less lucky compared to average:
On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 11:30:20 UTC, JN wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 08:39:20 UTC, bauss wrote:
The following language is a dangerous competitor to D.
https://github.com/joaomilho/Enterprise
I often feel like this kind of 'jokes' are trying too hard.
FizzBuzz Enterprise was
On 08/28/2018 04:39 AM, bauss wrote:
The following language is a dangerous competitor to D.
https://github.com/joaomilho/Enterprise
Truly a visionary for this Millennial age. The cloud-plans for
Enterprise Web 3.0 are particularly disruptive. I'm excited just
imagining the possibilities it
On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 08:39:20 UTC, bauss wrote:
The following language is a dangerous competitor to D.
https://github.com/joaomilho/Enterprise
I often feel like this kind of 'jokes' are trying too hard.
FizzBuzz Enterprise was fun when it first came out, and I know
it's popular to
On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 08:39:20 UTC, bauss wrote:
The following language is a dangerous competitor to D.
https://github.com/joaomilho/Enterprise
Thats very funny, but I found Rockstar even funnier.
12 matches
Mail list logo