All,
ARQ FAE in ALE400 has proven, in my limited experience, to be
extremely robust compared to other ARQ modes and occupies reasonable
bandwidth. How difficult would this mode be to port to FLARQ/NBEMS?
It seems to me to be tailor-made for this application (but what do I
know?). Is it a matter of
Or "This Was" :)
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patricia \(Elaine\) Gibbons"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> That's the way I look at it, Bill ...
>
>
>
> A sounding message is simply the station's callsign as the ALE ID,
> and soundings are only done if the station has an operator
Andy, thanks
I found the problem. It was a "unusual" setting in my router software.
In ALL software, I have to check "soundcard PTT". In WSJT6 however
this option has to be unchecked... no soundcard PTT.
Well, we got it working and I ran a few nice QSO's tonight on 80m.
Thanks fer the help,
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Bill McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hard to discern what is actually happening; seems like a tempest in a
> teapot.
>
> 73,
>
> Bill N9DSJ
Hi Bill,
This is simply childish backlash directed at me personally because I
opposed the Digital Stone
-For my plain MK , nor the MKII, I have..
0 2 0 Microsoft Soundmapper Input
1 2 0 Sound Blaster Audigy
2 2 0 Realtek AC97 Audio
3 0 2 Microsoft Soundmapper - Ouput
4 0 2 Sound Blaster Audigy
5 0 2 Realtek AC97 Audio
Default
I need help w/WSJT v 5.9.7 or 5.9.8 please.
first off...I need to say that this SW was running with my MK2. But
last weekend I had a harddrive crash and needed to reinstall everything.
MY MK2 workes fine w/DM780 and all my other Ham Software, except this
little JT65A program called WSJT (I use
Michael,
The UTU did RTTY and CW and the computer was used as a glass terminal. The
output was in TTL though not RS-232. A simple MAX-232 converter and hyperterm
should get you going.
Ted WT2G
-
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Ya
Hi Michael,
I used one of those many years ago with first a Commodore Pet and then
an Osborne One. My recollection is that the unit operates with any
RS-232 terminal program and interfaces through the serial port. Don't
think it takes any special software.
Hope this helps.
73, Chuck - AA5J
Rick,
I believe they address one of the largest shortcomings of packet: its
modem.
As I understand (I might be mistaken, I have not upgraded my PTC) it is
the same AX.25 protocol with a more robust modulation. In fact, a
different modulation with robust encoding.
73,
Jose, CO2JA
--
Rick w
Welcome Marcelo. I think you will find that almost all of the
abbreviations use in an actual QSO are based on the abbreviations used
in CW. Such as ES for and, WID for with, GUD for good, UR for your,
TNX for Thanks.
I stole the item below from a web site and lost the URL, I will post
due cred
That's the way I look at it, Bill ...
A sounding message is simply the station's callsign as the ALE ID,
and soundings are only done if the station has an operator present,
otherwise, the unattended stations are simply scanning the channels
on the HFlink netplan, and only respond if called
Hard to discern what is actually happening; seems like a tempest in a
teapot.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After Tony Blair has solved the Israel-Palestine issue, he may be
> needed to address those old fashioned RTTY folks w
http://www.ham-radio.ch/doc/HRDHilfe.pdf
--
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
(QSL via N2RJ)
After Tony Blair has solved the Israel-Palestine issue, he may be
needed to address those old fashioned RTTY folks who appear to be
preparing IED's for Bonnie.
(for trouble at mill reference, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLDVIViWW74 )
Andy K3UK
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Hello everybody,
I am new here and very pleased to find this group. I am also new on
BPSK31 and I started using some advices from the internet, without
anyone nearby to help me so I still don't know very basic things.
Does anybody know where can I find the most used Abbreviations,
acronyms, t
Hi i am new to this group and since joining learnt a lot great group.
I need some help here i was given a kantronics universal terminal unit
or the utu i am wondering has anyone used one i need some type of
software to run it anyone got any ideas.
Any help is appreciated.
Thankyou
Mike
VK2OZ.
And this:
As of 2008-01-12 21:51:22 UTC database contains 244754 entries with
2326 unique callsigns.
I know this is culled regularly by Joe for false decodes and incorrect
frequencies and such..but note that these are only JT65A
receptions; does not include the other WSJT modes.
73,
Bill N9
Hi Andy...nice to see you on Logger
i note that my RB has seen 141 unique callsigns...thats since 1st
Octthe mode is gaining interest ww and its partly due to you Bozo
Guide hi hi.
73 David VK4BDJ
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
One measure of the JT65A activity to be had...
VE3CDX/W7
One measure of the JT65A activity to be had...
VE3CDX/W7 14076 JT65A 15548 725
VE3CDX's station has heard 725 unique callsigns, not bad for a mode
that was not even on HF less than a year ago !
--
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
(QSL via N2RJ)
Hi Alan,
I agree to a point, it depends on ones focus, if you recall I have
always run my GAP DX Voyager antenna when looking for world wide
activity such as in HFlink events, that antenna at 100 watts and an
ATU works all Amateur bands 100%. However using a Skywave antenna
heavily takes away
Alan,
If you look at your response, you will see that you mostly agree with
what Andy, and John and I have been saying. And it is fair to say that
there is minimal PSKmail and NBEMS activity. Much, less than wide band
ALE (141A). Of course most digital hams here in the U.S. are not going
to b
Jim wrote:
>> Consequently, when you say no communications, you are overstating the
>> facts. Now maybe, a runner in a vehicle may the only means of
>> communication, but never the less, it is communications.
>>
>>
And the most important limitation: Even once roads were open to
non-emergency
Hi
I planned to build a dipole antenna for 30m.
Mostly for C/MT HELL, SlowHell and other Hell mode.
I'd like to try the "jason" mode too, and some other extremely slow mode.
Seen some 10Hz large slow C/MT Hell screenshot.
Any guess about the used software for that ?
Even found a 0.5Hz (!!!) MT Hel
Thanks Andy for an excellent summary of ALE
I do have one slight correction:
> enough. The concept of ALE requires automated beacons, "soundings",
> that are often unattended.
ALE does not "require" soundings. It's still a huge value add to be able
to find a station or assemble a net through a
FYI from my "cousin" Sholto's fine web page..
http://www.projectsandparts.com/pactor/
UTC CallNameGridSeenDialMark/Space ModePol
Modem Message
01-12 16:37 NI2OMarkFN20bs W9OTR 10.14722HF
PACKET 300 USB
01-12 1
Rick wrote:
> There is minimal ALE activity here in North America.
Ahh, the personal dispute with ALE again. OK, I'll bite.
You could also say there is a minimal of pskmail, nbems, or other activity.
The "I listened and did not hear much" argument. If we used that, you'd
conclude the only activ
I always chuckle when operators who have never used scanning ALE or
never even used ALE on the ham bands try to make pronouncements as if
they are experts.
I have 100 ALE stations in my log here since I reset the log file
just before the AOTAW event in October 2007. My ALE station is not
special,
Alan,
I APPLAUD your efforts during that storm! Your last statement hit home, that
if people don't practice they won't be prepared!
Our problem is that we train and train and train, but are NEVER called upon
during the Statewide or County exercises. Doesn't do ANY good to practice what
you'v
jgorman01 wrote:
> Your first paragraph indicates that the shelter was so remote and
> isolated that it required helicopter delivery of food and water. Yet
> you also indicate that you were in your truck which indicates you
> could drive to the shelter. Maybe you were driving a monster truck?
> S
Hi Andy,
All true, I could not agree more!
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 10:20 AM 1/12/2008, you wrote:
>I'll say again... the only thing wrong with the concept of ALE is the
>lack of active users. Everything else about ALE makes perfect sense
>to me. Here are the basics.
Rick,
You obviously don't understand NVIS, the bulk of all my ALE activity
is NVIS based, this is true of Amateur Radio as well, which is 30m
and lower ( 5Mhz thru 11Mhz is excellent during the day, that is our
premiere MARS range, 5-7Mhz can be counted on 24/7 by the way, its
too bad that th
I'll say again... the only thing wrong with the concept of ALE is the
lack of active users. Everything else about ALE makes perfect sense
to me. Here are the basics.
Automatic Link Establishment = the software (or firmware) stores
reception reports and when you want to call a known station it w
John and group,
There is minimal ALE activity here in North America. Maybe there are
untold thousands of operators in other parts of the world but not here.
For those who have been hams for any length of time and operated HF, it
is obvious that the higher HF frequencies are not open very often.
I've found it interesting reading about US Emergency Comms. It seems to me
that many of your counties etc are quite small and don't have the critical
mass to invest in comprehensive comms networks.
Here in Queensland (Australia) the state government has an agency devoted to
emergencies (EMQ - E
Alan Barrow wrote:
> I've personally gone on site for two hurricanes. Not because I'm a
> cop wanna-be. No, I did it at significant personal cost and
> discomfort because thousands of folks needed help. And were asked,
> somewhat desperately, to help. And we were uniquely positioned to
> help
35 matches
Mail list logo
