Re: [digitalradio] ROS back bigger and better !

Your Subject says ROS is better. Where can I read about the changes and improvements? Can users control whether ROS should generate the artificial spots? Jim - K6JM - Original Message - From: Peter L. Jackson To: * Digitalradio Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 6:37 PM Sub

Re: [digitalradio] ROS Returns

What mode are you talking about? I'm interested. On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:59 PM, F.R. Ashley wrote: > > > Whats so dang fantastic about ROS anyway, that it deserves pages and pages > of emails about it? Remember that other new digital mode a few months ago, > and how great it was, or have you f

Re: [digitalradio] ROS Returns

Whats so dang fantastic about ROS anyway, that it deserves pages and pages of emails about it? Remember that other new digital mode a few months ago, and how great it was, or have you forgotten abouit it already? 73 Buddy WB4M RTTY forever - Original Message - From: "Steinar Aanesland

Re: [digitalradio] New question

Steinar, It is the vehicle of a world wide group with different time zones etc. There are reactions days later, and so on. I will stop. It is useless anyway. No bad feeling from this side. 73 Rein -Original Message- >From: Steinar Aanesland >Sent: Jul 14, 2010 1:05 PM >To: digitalrad

Re: [digitalradio] New question

Jeff, I am monitoring it Few amateurs are, I believe. Few amateurs ever tried it. I used it before the illegal ruling came. ( My opinion ) You have to listen abroad to hear/see the activity. I would say in spite of the actions by rhe author. Users seem to like it. I like it. Nobody else here

[digitalradio] Need states for TPA

Friend of mine Andy , RG4F , need badly DE ID IN LA ME MI MS NV ТВ OR SC SD UT WV AK for TPA. He will be tomorrow, 15 July from 2 to 3GMT on 14083 RTTY . Any help will appreciate very much. For exactly sked in other time contact him direct rz...@ya.ru. Thanks. Best regards 73 Vlad UA6JD web

Re: [digitalradio] New question

What are you basing that statement on??The Hamspots page? You need to take a look at the left column - see the red squares? That indicates that the spot was auto-generated by the ROS software -- BOGUS spots! The real spots are the ones w/o the red square - I didn't see more than a dozen

Re: [digitalradio] New question

Hi Rain I meant on this forum ;) la5vna Steinar On 14.07.2010 18:20, rein...@ix.netcom.com wrote: > Hello Steinar, > > It is gaining in usage and popularity. > Even the spam messages do not seem to make a difference. > I for one, thought it would, wrong again! > > Amateur Radio a la 2010 >

[digitalradio] ROS Returns

ROS v4.7.0 Beta is out.. http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/ S

[digitalradio] Re: Random data vs Spread Spectrum

I agree. Which is why people using ROS with a program that supported no other mode (nor RSID) caused such a conflict with people running other software that supported anything but ROS. Julian, G4ILO --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KH6TY wrote: > > Julian, > > The "other side of the coin"

Re: [digitalradio] Digitsl modes?

Hi Rein, Thanks, much somebody mentioned that earlier I think PE9PE Rob in Zoetermeer. We did not discuss the actual signature. No amateur transmission obviously! tnx 73 Rein W6SZ -Original Message- >From: Rein Couperus >Sent: Jul 14, 2010 9:24 AM >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >S

Re: [digitalradio] New question

Hello Steinar, It is gaining in usage and popularity. Even the spam messages do not seem to make a difference. I for one, thought it would, wrong again! Amateur Radio a la 2010 73 Rein W6SZ -Original Message- >From: Steinar Aanesland >Sent: Jul 14, 2010 10:58 AM >To: digitalradio@y

Re: AW: [digitalradio] Digitsl modes?

Tnx Sigi, Are those amateur transmissions? Look to me as occupying quite a few channels and that is done on 30m ? 73 Rein W6SZ -Original Message- >From: Siegfried Jackstien >Sent: Jul 14, 2010 12:26 PM >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: AW: [digitalradio] Digitsl modes? > >Loo

[digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio group. File: /ROS v1.0.zip Uploaded by : dg9bfc Description : OLD ROS 1.0 You can access this file at the URL: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digita

AW: [digitalradio] Digitsl modes?

Looks like a drm signal or digital sstv . do not know hat it is but somethink like that!

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Random data vs Spread Spectrum

Julian, The "other side of the coin" is that we must share frequencies (because there is limited space), so in order to do that, it is necessary to be able to understand a request to QSY or a QRL. When there was only CW and phone, this was always possible, but with digital modes, if you do not

Re: [digitalradio] New question

Hello friends, I don't know about you , but I feel it is time to leave Jose and his ROS mode now. He doesn't deserve that much attention. la5vna Steinar On 14.07.2010 12:06, Dave Wright wrote: > Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his > website? > > > On

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Random data vs Spread Spectrum

Alan: For what reason (technical advantage) would you advocate the use of SS at HF. (My apologies, if I am off base, for assuming that you would advocate the use of SS, by the “lost cause” descriptor) . Les Lester B Veenstra MØYCM K1YCM l

Re: [digitalradio] New question

Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his website? On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Rein A wrote: > Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom > agent at FCC: > > "ROS is not "Spread Spectrum" because the 3khz HF standard channel is > maintaine

Re: [digitalradio] Digitsl modes?

Thats the OTH radar on Cyprus. Rein PA0R >Hi. > >Listening on 30 meter tonight, I noticed signals as in here: > >http://www.nitehawk.com/rasmit/ros/websdr1.jpg >http://www.nitehawk.com/rasmit/ros/websdr3.jpg (1) > >see at 10.120 KHz and between 10.110 and 10.114 KHz > >These type of signals are a

[digitalradio] Re: Random data vs Spread Spectrum

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Alan Barrow wrote: > > Here we disagree somewhat. I would mostly agree for areas like 40m, > especially if multiple channels were used like ROS did. But I don't > agree that a new & otherwise legal mode that is SSB width should be > excluded just because the b

[digitalradio] Re: Random data vs Spread Spectrum

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "J. Moen" wrote: > > I think if 3 kHz SSB is ok, that 2.25 kHz modes (ROS as an example) should be > ok, as long as the frequencies chosen are prudent for the band and time of > time. I agree, if people had more flexibility as to where to operate it would b

Re: [digitalradio] Why even use SS, a waste of resources?

Lester, Months of testing of all available modes on a 200 mile, weak signal, path on 432 MHz support what you say. Contestia (or Olivia, but slower) has surfaced as the most reliable mode we have found in the difficult environment of signals marginally above the noise, fading (QSB) as deep at

[digitalradio] Why even use SS, a waste of resources?

Now let’s cut to the chase: THE USE OF SPREADSPECTRUM, THAT IS, THE USE OF BANDWIDTH EXPANSION TECHNIQUES BY ADDING PSEUDORANDOM DATA, NOT CREATED FROM THE USER INPUT INFORMATION DATA, IS OF NO ADVANTAGE IN IMPROVING THE END TO END PERFORMANCE OF A LINK, WHEN COMPARED WITH PROPERLY SELECTED M

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Random data vs Spread Spectrum

Alan, Thanks for taking the time for a comprehensive reply! Remembering what happens during a contest with overcrowding made me wonder. The problem is that, with stations operating all independently, it is difficult to determine when throughput drops to the point it is not worth the effort. I