Re: [digitalradio] Re: Airmail

Or, Scott, try Google with airmail agwpe there are many links to answer your question several ways. 73, Chuck AA5J Gary wrote: > > > Scott, > > Take a look here. Question #3015 > > http://www.winlink.org/faq > > 73, > > Gary N7XOO > > --- In digitalradio@yahoo

Re: [digitalradio] There really is no flame war from my perspective OT OT OT OT TO

So, is this discussion off topic or what? This must be the 50th time that I have had to delete this same discussion. What say you give it a rest? Please? Chuck AA5J Rick W wrote: > > Hi Stelios, > > The reason you may not have heard from others with their difficulties > with Linux, is that t

Re: [digitalradio] SL-1 with Ten Tec 540

Kim My guess is that 20-30 watts out is all you will be able to get and have your signal remain linear. Make sure you have zero ALC. 73, Chuck AA5J Kim wrote: > > I am using my new old Ten Tec 540 in digital mode. What I am finding > is I am only able to get 20-30 watts out due to my sound card

Re: [digitalradio] Re: illinoisdigital group

I only wish Yahoo would find another sponser for the group. What happened to all the good information in the files section? What happened to all the good information in the posts? Who actually owns the posts by group members? Are we all to be punished? John, Exactly how does one actually contact Y

Re: [digitalradio] RTTY Dilemma

Aha! I get the point. I was thinking 'casual' and you were thinking 'competitive'. Sorry for the QRM. :-[ Michael Keane K1MK wrote: > On 9/28/2008 9:04 PM, Chuck Mayfield wrote: > > >> Are you picking Nits? You actually want all the software developers &g

Re: [digitalradio] RTTY Dilemma

Rick, Are you picking Nits? You actually want all the software developers except three to make modifications for 85 Hz? Oh, say, does everyone know which is the Mark and which is the Space? On twenty meters you are talking about the 5th and 6th decimal places. 14.08 vs 14.080085 MHz. Give me

Re: [digitalradio] SignaLink USB Interface Reviewed in Popular Communiations, September 2008

Mark Thompson wrote: > http://www.popular-communications.com/PC%20Highlights%20Sept%2008.html > TECH SHOWCASE > The SignaLink USB Interface—A Plug-And-Play Solution For Digital > Communications Modes > by John Kasupski, KC2HMZ > > Anyone who has experimented with receiving digital format signals

Re: [digitalradio] Fast ARQ Hardware

Tom Tcimpidis wrote: > > As an engineer who designed RF systems in a place far away and long ago, > > the cost of switching 100 watts of RF electronically as opposed to a > fast relay device is MUCH higher. > > Most Amateurs simply would not want to pay the price of fast > all-electronic switchin

Re: [digitalradio] AX.25 vs Something New

the group experimenting with such proposals? > > 73, > > Rick, KV9U > > Chuck Mayfield - AA5J wrote: > > Bill Vodall WA7NWP wrote: > > > >>> Phil's paper is from many years ago but the reality is that there > was no > >>> further movement a

Re: [digitalradio] AX.25 vs Something New

Bill Vodall WA7NWP wrote: > > > Phil's paper is from many years ago but the reality is that there was no > > further movement away from the legacy AX.25 equipment toward a new > > layer, much less toward a completely new protocol. > > There is some movement... > > Check out: > > FX.25 - Forward Err

Re: [digitalradio] AX.25 vs Something New

Rud Merriam wrote: > > You mention protocol layers. Which model do you want to use for > discussion, > OSI or the Internet model? Perhaps not a big question since layers 1 & > 2 are > the same but once we start moving up the stack they differ. > > I have a problem with the formatting on thi

Re: [digitalradio] AX.25 vs Something New

Rud Merriam wrote: > > I suggest anyone interested in this topic start by reading > http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/2504/http:zSzzSzpeople.qualcomm. > > comzSzkarnzSzpaperszSznewlinkpaper.pdf/karn94toward.pd

Re: [digitalradio] Re: CW - last resort?

Do not laugh. It could come to pass that we (mankind) will need to reinvent spark gap.Who knows what evil lurks in the minds Chuck AA5J At 02:39 PM 6/1/2008, Jack Hamilton wrote: >On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:07:17 -0400, "Paul L Schmidt, K9PS" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> s

Re: [digitalradio] 10MHz Ham Digi Band Research Survey Chart 10140-10150kHz

At 12:48 PM 4/12/2008, expeditionradio wrote: >New 10MHz Ham Digi Band Research Survey Chart >10140kHz to 10150kHz Digital/Auto Sub-Band >Click here: >http://hflink.com/bandplans/10mhz/ > >73 Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA What was the question that was answered to make the c

Re: [digitalradio] April QST page 35

Speaking of page 35, Is anyone using Outpost with soundcard? Chuck AA5J

Re: [digitalradio] RFI-Free PCs?

Is your display LCD or CRT? In my experience, CRT displays are sometimes a major source.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: RFSM 8000

dmitry_d2d wrote: > > 1. A few words about OFDM and serial tone modem. > Let's find out how the fight between ISI and Doppler shift > takes place in these systems. OFDM uses the great number of low > speed channels so the symbol duration increases. While the > duration of ISI is much smaller than s

OT Re: [digitalradio] Data Defined

Harry Wiliford wrote: > > [edit] Etymology > The word data is the plural of Latin datum, neuter past participle of > dare, "to give", hence "something given". The past participle of "to > give" has been used for millennia, in the sense of a statement accepted > at face value; one of the works of Eu

Re: [digitalradio] Welcome to the Group

Howard, Howdy, neighbor. I have * an ft857D that I have yet to use except 80m cw. * computer-ft857 interface that I bought over the internet from BuxComm. * a 25'-55' teletower. * an 11 element 2 m antenna somewhere in the back yard * the windoze version of NBEMS, and * a t

Re: [digitalradio] Is Propnet/HF APRS legal in USA ? (was : Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink

to wait until we find out. > >Chuck Mayfield wrote: > > Yes. Thank you for your very welcome explanation. I guess someone > > has to stir the pot, but I was having fun in my ignorance and bliss. > > I don't really want anyone to clarify that I can not do something > &g

Re: [digitalradio] Is Propnet/HF APRS legal in USA ? (was : Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink

At 04:36 PM 1/13/2008, Rick wrote: >Chuck, > >Enough of your nonsense! Those of us who want integrity in the amateur >bands are doing our best. You clearly have guilt in what you are doing >and you fear that it will be an illegal activity. Your activities may be >interpreted as perfectly legal ...

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Is Propnet/HF APRS legal in USA ? (was : Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war

. > >73, > >Bill N9DSJ > >--- In ><mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, >Chuck Mayfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > > > At 09:57 AM 1/13/2008, Rick wrote: > > >My preference would have been for those who w

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Is Propnet/HF APRS legal in USA ? (was : Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war

sign, this could in >essence turn into real time "instant messaging" service. Is this ok? >If not, why not? No, because you said 'unattended'. Each amateur radio station has to have a control operator. With a control operator, the ARS is not unattended. If there is no

Re: [digitalradio] Is Propnet/HF APRS legal in USA ? (was : Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink

" It is not possible to just "know" the >interpretation of every rule as written in a regulation. You simply must >contact those who do the interpretation when you are in doubt. > >Do you have a better understanding of why this is done in this manner? > >73, > >

Re: [digitalradio] Is Propnet/HF APRS legal in USA ? (was : Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink

At 01:54 PM 1/13/2008, kh6ty wrote: >You obviously do not understand reproprocity principle and how it applies to >radio, Chuck, and in most cases the PropNet station is running less power >than others, or what is the point of using it to determining propagation? >Beacon stations also tend to run

Re: [digitalradio] Is Propnet/HF APRS legal in USA ? (was : Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink

At 10:14 AM 1/13/2008, kh6ty wrote: >PropNet station, and that station *consistently*, and repetitively, >interferes with activity on that frequency, the presumption has to be that >the PropNet operator is either willfully transmitting on top of existing >activity, or lying about being at the "cont

Re: [digitalradio] Is Propnet/HF APRS legal in USA ? (was : Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink

I certainly agree. Now, given the FCC's position, why do we amateurs need all the activist lawyers and lawyer-wannabes from our ranks sending queries to the FCC concerning practices by other control operators? We are all responsible for our own operations. Right? Chuck AA5J At 10:14 AM 1/13

Re: [digitalradio] Is Propnet/HF APRS legal in USA ? (was : Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink

At 09:57 AM 1/13/2008, Rick wrote: >My preference would have been for those who want to operate these kinds >of modes to request an interpretation and if the finding was not to >their satisfaction, to petition the FCC for a rule change. They did not >do this and now some of us have had to take acti

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink

This is getting ridiculous! It takes me nearly 10 seconds to say "This is AA5J Is the frequency in use?"

Re: [digitalradio] KANTRONICS UTU TERMINALS

Hi Michael, I used one of those many years ago with first a Commodore Pet and then an Osborne One. My recollection is that the unit operates with any RS-232 terminal program and interfaces through the serial port. Don't think it takes any special software. Hope this helps. 73, Chuck - AA5J

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Yes, Skip. My bad. You are correct except for the "." at the end of the link Sorry for the qrm... that is little QRM, like psk31 is 73 Chuck AA5J > > > > At 01:02 PM 1/6/2008, Nick wrote: > > > >>Hello Haward, > >> > >>Happy New Year! > >> > >>Sorry, > <http://www.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Try: http://www.w1khj.com/NBEMS CHUCK AA5J At 01:02 PM 1/6/2008, Nick wrote: >Hello Haward, > >Happy New Year! > >Sorry, http://www.w1khj/NBEMS is not a working link. > >"Server not found >Firefox can't find the server at www.w1khj.com " > >73! > >Sunday, January 06, 200

Re: [digitalradio] A tad off-topic - Excess coax

myself, but thought I should at least be nice enoough to > respond, since you took the time to answer my post. > >Tnx! >Dave KB3MOW > > >Chuck Mayfield wrote: >> >>If it were my station, I would wrap it around a 3 to 4 inch form and >>lay it behind the opera

Re: [digitalradio] A tad off-topic - Excess coax

If it were my station, I would wrap it around a 3 to 4 inch form and lay it behind the operating table. That would further limit RF noise and would do no harm to SWR. Best regards, Chuck Mayfield Neither a lofty degree of intelligence nor imagination nor both together go to the making of

Re: [digitalradio] Encomm error loading CD

Did you verify the MD5SUM on the .iso file? I would expect a bad download. It may be a pain, but I would suggest you download again if the MD5SUM does not compare. Best regards, Chuck Mayfield Success is the ability to go from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm. ~ Sir Winston

Re: [digitalradio] Need to Expand the HF Auto Band Segments

I don't think "10% of each HF ham band" is at all reasonable. Perhaps "10% of each data b and segment" would be more reasonable. Your suggestion for automatic sub bands would take an unreasonably large part of most data sub bands. see my notes below in [brackets]] 7

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Need KAM Plus manual

At 02:13 PM 10/11/2007, n6vl wrote: >I was successful after calling Kantronics. The tech support guy >referred me to the mods.dk web site. I was able to get scanned PDFs >for a small donation. > >73, > >Steve N6VL Steve, I also have a KAM Plus with no manual. I would be eternally grateful i

Re: [digitalradio] Ham radio today and its roots. 'Hobby' was not top dog in the listing

At 02:04 PM 9/23/2007, WD8ARZ Comcast wrote: >Ham radio today is no doubt 'different' today than it was in the past. > >But the past is our history. > >Wasn't to many years ago that the purpose of ham radio had a listing in the >FCC rules. > >Hobby wasn't the top one listed .. > >73 from Bill

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FCC and the unattended ALE/PACTOR lepers

Folks, [mounting soapbox] when I was young, say 45 years ago, my brothers and I would be arguing. One would say "Dad, so and so is doing [whatever]." Dad would reply, "Do you guys REALLY want me to come in there?" Look. Government toleration of ham radio is good. Government regulation of ham rad

Re: [digitalradio] ARRL wake up ......

Bruce, You might want to post your rant to THE LEAGUE. You are preaching mostly to the choir here. HI HI Chuck AA5J At 11:16 PM 4/27/2007, bruce mallon wrote: >OK > >RM-11306 is on the back burner for now what will the >ARRL do next ? > >Here is what they SHOULD do ... > >ASK with a list of q

Re: [digitalradio] ADDITIONAL TIPS FOR USING JT65 IN WSJT VERSION 5.9.2

Try http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/Documentation.htm 73, Chuck, AA5J At 03:41 PM 4/6/2007, Jose A. Amador wrote: > > * TUTORIAL. Study the new tutorial at > > > http://pulsar.princeton.edu/~joe/K1JT/Tutorial_590.txt > >Got a 404

[digitalradio] Politics be gone

OK! I have come up with a way to ignore all this spam about politics, including; ARRL and FCC. Rule: if header contains [digitalradio] And body contains (ARRL OR FCC) then delete_message. Hopefully, I will not miss those messages that actually pertain to digitalradio. 73, Chuck AA5J

Re: [digitalradio] "legal Mode" guidelines

OK this is starting to look like character assassination. Please excuse me while I still have my character 73, Chuck AA5J At 01:12 PM 3/18/2007, kv9u wrote: >Bruce, > >You have to understand that John and his group have (had?), very >different agendas than most hams, and that includes digitally

Re: [digitalradio] Re: What's with Boulder?

t out a bit that says DST for the clock to have >known to change. > >My clock does have time zone settings incorporated into the software. >I had to set that up initially. > >Jim >WA0LYK > >--- In ><mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>digitalradio@yahoogroups.co

Re: [digitalradio] What's with Boulder?

Wait! WWV and WWVB transmit UTC time codes. There is absolutely no way for either station to 'know' in which time zone your atomic clock is located. So How could they correct time for DST??? Enlighten me please 73, Chuck/AA5J At 09:00 PM 3/11/2007, Les Warriner wrote: >Whoops. Yes,

Re: [digitalradio] Bad PSK signals ?

Suggestion: Don't wait for an OO. Look up his call at QRZ.com, get his phone number, give him a call and talk to him about the problem. The op probably does not know that he is over-driving his audio. Chuck AA5J At 08:00 AM 3/10/2007, Andrew O'Brien wrote: >I was watching a bad PSK31 signal

Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info

I don't know that you have seen this link, so just in case you might be able to get an idea http://www.winlink.org/Presentations/SCAMPspec.pdf I KNOW that I could not develop anything based on it, but perhaps you or someone else on this reflector can. Chuck AA5J At 02:43 PM 3/9/2007, Rei

Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info

A list moderator graciously corrected me. Therefore, I retract the following erroneous statement: It appears that SCS modems can copy WL2k ARQ transmissions even though the listener is not an addressee.. I stand corrected. 73, Chuck AA5J At 04:49 PM 3/8/2007, Chuck Mayfield wrote

Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info

I agree with Joe on this point. Amateur radio has always been self policing. How can we self police the Pactor operators, automatic or manually controlled, when even if we spend the big bucks to acquire a pactor modem, we can not monitor their transmissions? We can not even know whether the

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Detecting Digital Modes

he time to do a Clusty search. > >Besides, since someone posted the acronym it was fair >to ask them to define it! :-) > > > Chuck Mayfield - AA5J wrote: > > Doc, > > Try Google. > > > > *HOKA* Electronic - The Netherlands - HF Data Decoder and Analyzer > &g

Re: [Bulk] [digitalradio] Re: Detecting Digital Modes [Was: Newbie to DigitalRadio - Couple of Questions]

Doc, Try Google. *HOKA* Electronic - The Netherlands - HF Data Decoder and Analyzer *HOKA* Electronic, HF Data Communications Consultant, Data Analyzer and Decoder. www.*hoka*.com/ - 8kCached

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

At 01:25 PM 1/30/2007, Rein Couperus wrote: >M$ gives you windows, Linux gives you as many desktops as you like :)) > >Rein Rein, I am certainly not a fan of M$ or Windows, but M$ Windows is used by a VERY large percentage of ham radio operators who use computers. FNPsk runs directly under window

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

At 03:27 AM 1/30/2007, Rein Couperus wrote: >Everybody with an HF trx and a laptop that has a CD drive and a >soundcard can set up a server and connect it to the internet, >provided the trx has reasonable fequency stability >. >We are planning to include HF forwarding capability in both client an

Re: [digitalradio] US Hams Codeless Feb 23

At 01:47 PM 1/20/2007, larry allen wrote: >Hi Danny.. >The problem we are having is that most of our new hams don't seem to get >on the air... >We have more hams now than ever before yet our bands are quieter than they >have ever been, since the 60's at least >Larry ve3fxq Look at the competi

Re: [digitalradio] US Hams Codeless Feb 23

t 11:22 PM 1/19/2007, John Champa wrote: >Chuck, > >Guess I am no longer fully qualified as a Ham (HI). > >What is a 10-36? > >Tnx, >John >K8OCL > >----Original Message Follows >From: Chuck Mayfield <<mailto:clmayfield%40verizon.net>[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [digitalradio] US Hams Codeless Feb 23

At 05:07 PM 1/19/2007, Radioguy wrote: >Codeless Amateur Radio Testing Regime Appears Set to Begin February 23 Yahoo, Good Buddy. Can I get a 10-36? Chuck AA5J

Re: [digitalradio] LinLink - LinLink List

At 11:28 AM 1/19/2007, DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA wrote: >You can subscribe to the LinLink E-Mail list at: >http://www.wetnet.net/mailman/listinfo/linlink/ That's good Walt. I thought I was subscribed to that linkink list, but the last mess

Re: [digitalradio] PSKMail

At 12:13 PM 1/12/2007, DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA wrote: >For some reason I can't get the latest information on PSKMail...actually >I think the pskmail.org URL and some others are being blocked. The last >I info I have is from Rein is dated Aug 2005. > >Am I correct in that PSKMail is now usin

[digitalradio] Wassup?

Did I get bounced or something? I received my last [digitalradio] message at 6:12pm 1/4 . Chuck AA5J

Re: [digitalradio] Re: LOTW Olivia, not a lot !

mulveyraa2 wrote: -- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com <mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>, Chuck Mayfield - AA5J > > > You're not reading the error message it gave you. It says that > "Call sign, DXCC Entity and QSO date range don't match up". Note the &

Re: [digitalradio] LOTW Olivia, not a lot !

> <mailto:digital_modes%40yahoogroups.com> > moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk> > - Original Message - > From: "Chuck Mayfield - AA5J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:clmayfield%40verizon.net>

Re: [digitalradio] LOTW Olivia, not a lot !

Doc, I don't agree with your last. CW DATA AND RTTY are allowed by Extra Class licensees 7000-7125 and by General and Advanced Class licensees 7025-7125. Chuck, AA5J

Re: [digitalradio] LOTW Olivia, not a lot !

Andrew O'Brien wrote: > I'm surprised that of all the Olivia QSOs I have logged there are only > 5 verified via LOTW > > > I think I can understand why. Why does it have to be so complicated to get a cert with lotw? Chuck, aa5j PS I am debating whether or not it is more trouble than it is wo

Re: [digitalradio] New to PSK31 - advice please ??

> Adrian, > I googled "optoisolators Ireland" and Radionics Ireland has them in stock. 73, Chuck, AA5J

[digitalradio] Re: SSB mixed with Mixw output?

UH-OH! There I go again, barking up the wrong tree. The culprit was the "Trial" VAC 4.03 software used to interface Mixw to the SDR-1000. I am still dissapointed that an apparently unadvertised software trap caused me to transmit SSB on a non-SSB frequency, even if it was for a very short tra

Re: [digitalradio] Digital havoc with devices in car

Brett Owen Rees VK2TMG wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > The attachment worked ok here for me. The sound seems to be saying > 'trial' in a female voice. It sounds like a piece of applications > software or your driver is doing this. Have you tried killing off > processes using task manager to see if you c

Re: [digitalradio] SSB mixed with Mixw output?

Robert Chudek - KØRC wrote: > Chuck, > > Well even with the new email header, the voice is still saying > "Trial"... "Trial"... ;-) > > 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN > > > > - Original Message - > *From:* Chuck Mayfield - AA5

Re: [digitalradio] Digital havoc with devices in car

Robert Chudek - KØRC wrote: Chuck, I will venture a guess you are using a trial version of the software because that is what I am hearing the voice say in the file you posted. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN - Original Message - *From:* Chuck Mayfield - AA5J <mailto:[EM

Re: [digitalradio] Clarification : Establishing digital calling/beacon frequencies

It seems to me that the IARU Region 2 bandplan should at least be consulted as part of the subject process.. See http://www.iaru-regionii.org/Region_2_HF_Band_Plan.html. 73 de AA5J Danny Douglas wrote: > As to the 160 meter band, I was taken aback by your comment about > operating > digital ou

Re: [digitalradio] 10 Khz signal

Robert McGwier wrote: > Is it heard at night? Then I am going to guess that it is digital > radio mondial broadcast. > > Bob > N4HY > > Chuck Mayfield - AA5J wrote: > > What is the signal that occupies 3990 to 4000? > > > > > > -- > AMSAT Dir

[digitalradio] 10 Khz signal

What is the signal that occupies 3990 to 4000?

RE: [digitalradio] digital modes and THE RADIO

At 06:41 AM 9/21/2006, you wrote: >Rick, > >Please explain "group delays". I am unfamilar with that term in >reference to transmitting equipment. > >Walt/K5YFW I am not Rick, but you can find the definition here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_delay Regards, Chuck AA5J Need a Digital m

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Can You Call Another Ham On The Air? Right Now?

ical. Leaving errors and misrepresentations unchallenged would be >irresponsible. > >73, > >Dave, AA6YQ > >--- In ><mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, >Chuck Mayfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > > > So what is t

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Can You Call Another Ham On The Air? Right Now?

So what is techincal about this thread at this point. Dave, you are wasting bandwidth here. Can we get back on topic, please? Chuck, AA5J At 11:22 PM 8/25/2006, you wrote: >Amateur radio began with the randomness of chance QSOs -- you >remember "CQ", don't you? Its not exactly honest to claim

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Best Mode for QRP?

At 08:59 AM 7/25/2006, you wrote: >Anyway where did that word [robustness] come from and when was it frist to >used? Robust Insensitivity of a process output to the variation of the process inputs. Robust Process A robust process is one that is operating at 6 sigma and is therefore resistant t

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Army MARS Implementing Winlink

At 07:07 AM 3/4/2006, Rein wrote: >The only thing you have to do to allow PSKmail access is to open WINLINK >for POP3. By the way, PSKmail works also with your own ISP, so it >actually does not need WINLINK. You could use any Gmail account for >that, provided it is properly spam filtered. > >I am

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

At 12:47 PM 3/3/2006, Tim wrote: >N6CRR, > >I agree with you. > >tim ab0wr > >On Thursday 02 March 2006 23:15, N6CRR wrote: //snip// > Actually, I think is is a rather good development. //snip// I agree with you and Tim. I also think WINLINK and WINLINK 2000 are good for amateur radio. Maybe

Re: [digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.....do as we say, not what we do

He who tries to inflict political statements on amateur radio is a DAMN FOOL. 73, Chuck, AA5J At 02:26 PM 2/26/2006, you wrote: >Its because the ARRL has gone nuts, like Bush. > >73 de WB4M >Buddy > Regards, ChuckM mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com/~clmayfield http://

Re: [digitalradio] Re: NTS and traffic handling and digital

>Greetings, As one who has been inactive in amateur radio emergency communications for several years, I heartily endorse the use of the Winlink system for EMCOMM. The reasons are as follows: Winlink 2000 tries to have 24/7 availability. And mostly succeeds, through the use of Automatic / Sem

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digital TV (off topic)

As a former user of a BUD (big ugly dish) of 10' diameter and analog TV signals, I can say for sure that there is absolutely no comparison with respect to video quality between the broadcast quality (eg., 34 dB SNR) video signal as received by the BUD and those transmitted by typical digital sa

[digitalradio] OT Ancestry's Clipping of the Day

Clipping of the Day Clearfield Progress (Clearfield, Pennsylvania), 27 January 1926, page 1 Mother Nature is Holding Grudge Against the Radio New York, Jan. 27. (INS.)--Radio fans throughout the country shook their heads disconsolately today with the conviction that mother nature is holding a

Re: [digitalradio] Re: need cluster testers

It works now. Chuck AA5J At 08:40 PM 1/14/2006, you wrote: >Just changed settings again...fire away > >Andy K3UK > >--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Mayfield ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Could not open connection to the host on port 23:

Re: [digitalradio] need cluster testers

Could not open connection to the host on port 23: Connect failed Chuck - AA5J At 07:30 PM 1/14/2006, you wrote: >If you have a chance to try connecting to > >Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > >I would appreciate it. I am not sure I fixed the problem but I have >at least got outgoing things such as

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

John, Wanna sell it? Chuck AA5J At 04:45 PM 1/14/2006, you wrote: >I would like to point out that Dave Struebel and the Winlink Group >are responsible for most of the QRM we enjoy on HF from unattended Winlink >stations, especially around 14105 to 14110. > >If Winlink, rather than spreading them

Re: [digitalradio] Re: PCALE, Use of, With ca 1980 transceivers

Muchas Gracias.  I am spending the next few months away from home and would like to be able to contact my friends more easily than using a hardwired sked. Chuck At 04:49 PM 11/30/05, you wrote: >< > Can a station using equipment that is not computer > controlled (e.g., Ten Tec Omni) use PCALE

Re: [digitalradio] PCALE, Use of, With ca 1980 transceivers

5:07 PM 11/30/05, you wrote: >Can it scan channels in memory ? > > >- Original Message - >From: "Chuck Mayfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: >Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 4:33 PM >Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PCALE, Use of, With ca 1980 transceivers

Re: [digitalradio] PCALE, Use of, With ca 1980 transceivers

I have been reading the mail here for some time. Can a station using equipment that is not computer controlled (e.g., Ten Tec Omni) use PCALE in any way? I have been inactive in ham radio since the early 90's and have fallen way behind the power curve. 73, Chuck AA5J -- No virus found in

Re: [digitalradio] Re: The skinny on software timebombs

e FCC to allocate some non- >amateur HF spectrum for wide-bandwidth amateur experimentation. My >point is that such signals are incompatible with the modest HF >allocations we have today, and should not be permitted there, the >apparent loophole in §97.305 notwithstanding. > > 73, &g

Re: [digitalradio] TNC troubles HELP! TO TONY KT2Q

At 02:28 AM 9/26/05, you wrote: >All: > >My KamPlus TNC and software were working fine until today. I had to reset >the defaults on the TNC and now the characters do not echo to the RX window. All, I have a KAM PLUS that I can not get to initialize. Tried changing the battery, but still hangs u

RE: [digitalradio] Winlink Scanning

a single frequency and not scanning two or three. >Please explain... > >Thanks... > >Skip KH6TY > >-- > >I'd like to clearly understand this issue, so if anyone can explain, >please do so! > >Additional information can be found at

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Win Link

t; that some commercial enterprise is going to "steal" some >amateur's > > source code released under the GPL, and make it into a >commercial > > product? Our local RACES group tried to get the source code >to > > ARESpack to no avail.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink

gt; > challenge of > > > > minimizing interference with novel technical and operational > > > approaches to > > > > the use of shared frequency bands". You have to admit Steve, > > the > > > WinLink > > > > community has been dragge

Re: [digitalradio] linux

At 12:25 PM 2/21/2005, you wrote: >anyone have a link for download of the Knoppix live cd with the ham >programs built in that is in English ? > >have the German version, but no fun to play with. > >david/wd4kpd Try starting it with "knoppix lang=en" Regards, Chuck - AA5J -- No virus foun