complaint with FCC.Also ask "t...@arrl.net"
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:23 PM, "John Becker, WØJAB"
wrote:
>
> I am all for busy detect.
>
> That being said what do you do with someone that has so much
> hate for Pactor (like KC7GNM ) that they turn to QRM'ing jamming
> or what ever you would like
I am all for busy detect.
That being said what do you do with someone that has so much
hate for Pactor (like KC7GNM ) that they turn to QRM'ing jamming
or what ever you would like to call it any time they hear it?
Right now the "only" tools that I have for busy detect for others
modes is my ea
Thanks Skip. primary mission is for regional access. So far that has turned
out to be the case, stations within a few hundred miles. I'm also paying
around with 10M ground wave to see what results are. 6M may also be tested.
Andy K3UK
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:00 AM, KH6TY wrote:
>
>
> Andy,
PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
>
>
>
> +++ More AA6YQ comments below
>
> -Original Message-
> From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
> Behalf Of KH6TY
> Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:02 PM
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Subjec
+++ More AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:02 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor
>>&
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 2:07 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor
Dave,
I re
At 12:52 PM 6/27/2010, you wrote:
>This has generated enormous frustration over the years, to the point where
>some operators now intentionally QRM such servers. This intentional QRM is as
>disgusting as running a server without a busy frequency detector, and provides
>a convenient excuse for se
I can't disagree with your points Dave. However, until I have more
experience with the busy detect from the server end, I think I'll feel more
"comfortable" in the auto-sub band...at least for now.. Then , if I do
transmit on a busy frequency despite the busy-detect, I'll feel less guilty.
Despite
ated here a few months ago that he would
investigate
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 9:25 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalrad
I agree Skip and have been studying the "unattended" sub-bands for suitable
frequencies.
Andy
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:24 AM, KH6TY wrote:
>
>
> Thanks, Andy.
>
> Unless it is not impossible to disable busy detect, to answer your previous
> question about where to operate with Winmor, I perso
Skip (and anyone else interested), see the attached screenshot showing
the Winmor server busy detect
Andy K3UK
11 matches
Mail list logo