Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect

2010-06-28 Thread Raymond Lunsford
complaint with FCC.Also ask "t...@arrl.net" On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:23 PM, "John Becker, WØJAB" wrote: > > I am all for busy detect. > > That being said what do you do with someone that has so much > hate for Pactor (like KC7GNM ) that they turn to QRM'ing jamming > or what ever you would like

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect

2010-06-28 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
I am all for busy detect. That being said what do you do with someone that has so much hate for Pactor (like KC7GNM ) that they turn to QRM'ing jamming or what ever you would like to call it any time they hear it? Right now the "only" tools that I have for busy detect for others modes is my ea

Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-28 Thread Andy obrien
Thanks Skip. primary mission is for regional access. So far that has turned out to be the case, stations within a few hundred miles. I'm also paying around with 10M ground wave to see what results are. 6M may also be tested. Andy K3UK On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:00 AM, KH6TY wrote: > > > Andy,

Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote: > > > > +++ More AA6YQ comments below > > -Original Message- > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on > Behalf Of KH6TY > Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:02 PM > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Subjec

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Dave AA6YQ
+++ More AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of KH6TY Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:02 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor >>&

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Dave AA6YQ
>>>AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of KH6TY Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 2:07 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor Dave, I re

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
At 12:52 PM 6/27/2010, you wrote: >This has generated enormous frustration over the years, to the point where >some operators now intentionally QRM such servers. This intentional QRM is as >disgusting as running a server without a busy frequency detector, and provides >a convenient excuse for se

Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
I can't disagree with your points Dave. However, until I have more experience with the busy detect from the server end, I think I'll feel more "comfortable" in the auto-sub band...at least for now.. Then , if I do transmit on a busy frequency despite the busy-detect, I'll feel less guilty. Despite

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Dave AA6YQ
ated here a few months ago that he would investigate 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of KH6TY Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 9:25 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalrad

Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
I agree Skip and have been studying the "unattended" sub-bands for suitable frequencies. Andy On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:24 AM, KH6TY wrote: > > > Thanks, Andy. > > Unless it is not impossible to disable busy detect, to answer your previous > question about where to operate with Winmor, I perso

[digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor [1 Attachment]

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
Skip (and anyone else interested), see the attached screenshot showing the Winmor server busy detect Andy K3UK