Jim,
Please note some of the 192 hits were from me or too me.
None of them address how QPSK63 was eplementation in FNpsk...did it use the
originator's code or modify it? Well it did modify it and added an "error
free"
capability.
What I am looking for is a technical description of FNpsk.
Wa
Walt,
Did you try Google? (193 hits)
Jim VA3JNO
Walt DuBose wrote:
>
>
> Can someone tell me about FNPSK?
>
> Thanks & 73,
>
> Walt/K5YFW
All,
I looked at FNpsk (http://www.w1fn.org/fnpsk/index.html) and downloaded
it.
It seen quite nice as a simple message exchange program. I personally
haven't tried it and you need to that two individuals running the
program to use it.
I have had reports from several individuals that FNpsk does
Can someone tell me about FNPSK?
Thanks & 73,
Walt/K5YFW
Anybody using FNpsk on a regular basis for emergency comm? I would
like to know pros and cons
K1CRU
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/y
OK Thanks. The one worry is that it runson
all sorts of operating systems. but doesnt list Win 2000.
Got it downloaded and will try anyway.
Danny
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
To
: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 22:09
To: carcomm@yahoogroups.com; NCARC
Cc: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK Success
Thanks for the test Rick . Did SCS announce something new at
Friedrichshafen ?
I agree that Scamp needs a keyboard component. I am not sure about MFSK1
- Original Message -
From: Andrew J. O'Brien
To: carcomm@yahoogroups.com ; NCARC
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:56 PM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [CARC] Fw: [digitalradio] FNPSK Success
- Original Message -
From: Rick Williams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, Ju
On Behalf Of Andrew J.
O'BrienSent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 21:13To:
digitalradio@yahoogroups.comCc: NCARC; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
carcomm@yahoogroups.comSubject: [digitalradio] FNPSK
Success
Rick and I did have success!
Here is what I received
NUM: 1 PREC:= HXG:= ST
You say this has fec? Where is the
software?
Danny
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
To unsubscribe f
Rick and I did have success!
Here is what I received
NUM: 1 PREC:= HXG:= STATION ORIG: KV9U
CHK: = 12 PLCE ORIG:= VIROQUA WI TIME FILED: 2349Z CDT DATE: 22 Jun 2005
TO:= K3UKTELEPHONE:= MESSAGE TEXT:= HI ANDREW X HOPE YOU ARE ABLE TO
COPY THIS MESSAGE OK SIGNATURE:= RICK KV9U
Ban
OK that sounds good. No di9fferent than PSK31
or PSK64 (whatever). I have been reading about some of these digital modes
that really confused the issue by needing all sorts of info between the
stations, before they can work. I was afraid this was going to be the
same.
Danny
The K3UK
Right off the bat, I suggest you give others
(including when spotting) the exact freq they will see on the waterfall, and not
the freq which shows on your rigs readout. It really gets confusing for
folk to spot something on 14.071 , 14.070 , 14.069 etc. since when we
click on that spot,
I'll monitor 14071 at 0100 but Rick and I have
moved our sked to 0200.
- Original Message -
From:
Andrew J.
O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 8:03
PM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re:
[digitalradio]
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re:
[digitalradio] FNPSK test tonight
I guess I am confused about passing all these
setting etc etc to make a contact. If a digital mode is not capable of
simply tuning across, and making a contact without all the extra setting-up
jazz, then maybe it needs a
By the way Rick, and anyone else interested, I did
get FNPSK set up with my Microkeyer, works fine
Andy K3UK
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Williams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 6:26
PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] FNPSK
I'm new to it too, so we will be novices
together. I'll be on 14071 at 0100
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Williams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 6:26
PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] FNPSK test
tonight
Andy
Pawel discussed using parallel decoders and picking the one with the
best SNR...it should be fairly easy for programs that already support
parallel decoding. If you can spot the bandwidth, though, that gives
most of the info, and once the selection of parameters for Olivia
settles down, it mig
I guess I am confused about passing all these
setting etc etc to make a contact. If a digital mode is not capable of
simply tuning across, and making a contact without all the extra setting-up
jazz, then maybe it needs a lot of fixing up before being turned over to the
rest of us. My o
radio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] FNPSK test tonight
Rick, what message format will you want to use ? I just set-up one
using the ARRL format but can do the others if you want. I have one
set-up for you.
Do you want the 31 or the 63 variety ?
Andy K3UK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroup
Rick, what message format will you want to use ? I just set-up one
using the ARRL format but can do the others if you want. I have one
set-up for you.
Do you want the 31 or the 63 variety ?
Andy K3UK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew J. O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ca
At 06:12 PM 4/3/2005, you wrote:
>FNpsk v2.5 (see www.W1FN.org)installs and runs great on my P3-550 XP
>desktop with PCI Soundblaster card.
>
>It also appears to INSTALL successfully (i.e., no error messages) on
>the following laptops. However, both laptops freeze as soon as FNpsk
>executes,
FNpsk v2.5 (see www.W1FN.org)installs and runs great on my P3-550 XP
desktop with PCI Soundblaster card.
It also appears to INSTALL successfully (i.e., no error messages) on
the following laptops. However, both laptops freeze as soon as FNpsk
executes, and I have to ctrl-alt-del to recover.
a
23 matches
Mail list logo
