> Posted by: "Jose Amador" [EMAIL PROTECTED] co2ja
> Date: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:33 pm ((PDT))
>
>I will
>
>I got mine without the battery box, so I am using it fixed with a 12 V
>PSU I built..
>I am very pleased with it. The last time I calibrated it, it was 1 Hz
>away from WWV on 15 MHz.
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
> I'm very happy with my RACAL. I often take it to the mountains as a
> backpack radio with it' 2.5 meter whip. See http://sv1uy.ampr.org/~sv1uy
I will
I got mine without the battery box, so I am using it fixed with a 12 V
PSU I built..
I am very pleased with it. The last
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose Amador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Off list, to avoid clutter.
Hi Jose,
A little history doesn't hurt anyone, and if it is about DIGITAL MODES
all the better.
> Now I have a FT-757, a Swan 700 and a PRM-4021. Excellent little radio.
> Is the work
Off list, to avoid clutter.
Well, my first setup was a Johnson Ranger and a HRO-60, heavily modified
(1972).
I built a multiband (80-40-20-15-10 m) phasing transmitter with a fixed
9 MHz IF.
Quite similar to a Hallicrafters HT-37. (1973)
I have used dipoles or verticals always, no beams.
I b
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Jose A. Amador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> I used TERMAN93 with a homebrew FSK modem and my PC in 1997 was a
> 386 at
> 25 MHz with 20 MB RAM. I had to tweak the too simple dot clock
> oscillator to shift it from 14.312 MHz to the correct frequency of
I used TERMAN93 with a homebrew FSK modem and my PC in 1997 was a 386 at
25 MHz with 20 MB RAM. I had to tweak the too simple dot clock
oscillator to shift it from 14.312 MHz to the correct frequency of
14.318181MHz.
I never knew about G4BMK Multi. But My PTC-II does that and more, too.
An
Most of the radio equipment that hams use today are commercial products.
Of course some do home brew them as well, and some, such as myself make
many other devices (active antennas, meters, QRP rigs, interfaces,
crystal calibrators, etc.) from various parts, some even recycled:). But
even those
>RE: [digitalradio] re: ARQ FAE
>Rud Merriam
>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:40:26 -0700
>Demetre,
>I am adding some material on Shannon-Hartley to The Ham Network Wiki
>(http://thehamnetwork.net/wiki/#Shannon-Hartley). I have been working
>the formula in Excel by duplicati
rsday, September 20, 2007 12:07 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] re: ARQ FAE
As for PACTOR 3 and how it works, I think that Rick KV9U has already
given
you an explanation. I must add that the good thing about PACTOR is that
it
can adapt very fast to conditions and
>Hello Steinar,
>
>OK for 18h30 to 19h00 UTC to-morrow evening.
>
>Note: you must have a stable frequency to avoid drift (in ALE you are
>supposed
>to have a fixed frequency), so one hour of working before the QSO will be ?
>good.
>
>73
>Patrick
Hi Patrick and Steinar,
OK about the test today T
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi Rick
>
> Calling on 14.109 now
>
> LA5VNA Steinar
Hi Steinar,
What is the effective speed of ARQ FAE please?
73 de Demetre SV1UY
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Bill McLaughlin
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:37 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ARQ FAE and 141A
Also copied alot of data frames from you tonight on 3.587 +1500 HZ
AF, USBnice signal Jose.
Also copied alot of data frames from you tonight on 3.587 +1500 HZ
AF, USBnice signal Jose.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Jose A. Amador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I found him on 14109.5 kHz dial QRG + 1500 Hz AF, USB.
>
> Jose, CO2JA
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _
13 matches
Mail list logo
