[digitalradio] Re: Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution:

2010-03-13 Thread g4ilo
I only read the group on the web, not by mail, and I don't see this message, only the complaints about it. From the addressee list in the copy attached to your post, which did not include my address, I would say this was sent directly to a list of addresses harvested some time ago, before I

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution:

2010-03-13 Thread Dave Sparks
Immediately, take me off of your mailing list Weird language for a constitutional amendment. g

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution:

2010-03-13 Thread Trevor .
No sign of the original here either. YU7EF doesn't say which group he wants to be removed from out of the many Yahoo and Gmail groups he sent the email to. 73 Trevor M5AKA

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution:

2010-03-13 Thread Raymond Lunsford
Not me as I never sent him an e mail.I choose the vocabulary of silence.Bye ya'll. On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Trevor . m5...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: No sign of the original here either. YU7EF doesn't say which group he wants to be removed from out of the many Yahoo and Gmail groups he sent