--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Roger J. Buffington"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To paraphrase Bill Clinton, it depends on one's use of the word
"many."
> In fact, a vanishingly small percentage of either American or European
> digital operators ever bought SCS modems, due to their high c
I'm sorry to inform you that I USED the carrier detect feature when I
ran my packet station and had very little problem with the "jamming"
you are describing.
On the other hand, nothing I was sending was time sensitive therefore
setting up the connect schedules to keep trying throughout a 24 hou
At 09:13 PM 29/12/2007, Rodger wrote:
>Demetre SV1UY wrote:
>
> > Quite the contrary, many american hams own a PTC-II modem, also there
> > are more PACTOR PMBOs in USA than the rest of the World right now my
> > friend.
>
>To paraphrase Bill Clinton, it depends on one's use of the word "many."
>I
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
> Quite the contrary, many american hams own a PTC-II modem, also there
> are more PACTOR PMBOs in USA than the rest of the World right now my
> friend.
To paraphrase Bill Clinton, it depends on one's use of the word "many."
In fact, a vanishingly small percentage of eit
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Roger J. Buffington"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My dear fellow, I once owned an SCS PTC-II. Very few American hams
ever
> bought one--they never sold well here.
Quite the contrary, many american hams own a PTC-II modem, also there
are more PACTOR PMBOs
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
>
> Hmm OK,
>
> I hope this anti SCS thing is not going to end to being an
> anti-European thing Roger. I get that feeling somehow, since SCS is
> not an American company.
My dear fellow, I once owned an SCS PTC-II. Very few American hams ever
bought one--they never sol
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Roger J. Buffington"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Demetre SV1UY wrote:
> >
> > You have your opinion and I have mine. Now if you can't be bothered
> > to look for PACTOR keyboard to keyboard QSOS this is your problem not
> > mine. When I look I can always
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "jgorman01" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what HF Packet BBS's you're talking about but all my
> packet tnc's had a carrier detect feature and would not transmit if
> one was detected. Was it perfect, heck no! But it was available AND
> it was tu
Jim
as far as I know all the hardware for pactor has the same thing.
But only for other pactor signals just like what you posted about
the packet system.
John
At 09:34 PM 12/28/2007, you wrote:
>I'm not sure what HF Packet BBS's you're talking about but all my
>packet tnc's had a carrier detect
I'm not sure what HF Packet BBS's you're talking about but all my
packet tnc's had a carrier detect feature and would not transmit if
one was detected. Was it perfect, heck no! But it was available AND
it was turned on.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Demetre SV1UY" <[EMAIL PRO
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
>
> You have your opinion and I have mine. Now if you can't be bothered
> to look for PACTOR keyboard to keyboard QSOS this is your problem not
> mine. When I look I can always find some.
You know, it may be that way in Europe. After all, SCS is there. Here
in the States
>>>AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Demetre SV1UY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>If you'd actually read any of my posts, Demetre, you'd know that my
>focus is on automatic stations without busy detectors -- no matter
>what protocol they are using. In fact I recently pos
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Roger J. Buffington"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, a couple of points.
>
> 1. No one is defending W1AW or the other practices that involve
> transmitting without listening. I happen to think that all such
> practices are morally wrong and legally que
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
> So what you are talking about PACTOR 3 being the only offender is FAR
> AWAY FROM THE TRUTH OM.
>
> There is no system today that has such a DETECTOR you are dreaming
> about.
My station does. A human operator.
>
> Finally if you are so adament about such a detector
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you'd actually read any of my posts, Demetre, you'd know that my
> focus is on automatic stations without busy detectors -- no matter
> what protocol they are using. In fact I recently posted here that
> bann
15 matches
Mail list logo
