On 12/15/2009 12:55 PM, Gary wrote:
I thought I'd run something up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes:
I would imagine, the license limitations would have to state something like a
maximum of 300 baud and 500 Hz bandwidth with a 200 watt power limit. There
may be other limitations that
Digital_modes
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159
- Original Message -
From: Rik van Riel
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Gary
Sent: Friday, December 25, 2009 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
On 12/15/2009 12:55 PM, Gary
/index.html
- Original Message -
From: Dan Hensley kc9...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
Another problem is that the old guard who have an axe to grind against new
amateurs due to the change
Im not sure where to go with this. I appreciate the fact that you agree with
many of us that the dropping of the CW requirement for Extra was the wrong way
to go. Many others will disagree with that, and like politics, they won and we
all have to live with that decision. But, it is no reason
Gary
I feel you are right on !
The problem is very much people are just lazy
and want everything on a silver platter.
Many feel it's a right not a privilege
I can see by your call that you have been here for a while.
I can still remember question number 5 on my test.
what happens to the plate
At 10:41 PM 12/15/2009, you wrote in part:
No one wants to send real cards. I would have cards made,
but who would I send them to when i know damn well I ain't
gonna get a REAL card in return?
try me!
I ONLY SEND REAL CARDS TRY ME TOO ..
--- On Wed, 12/16/09, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net wrote:
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 12:08 PM
At 10
, 2009 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
Another problem is that the old guard who have an axe to grind against
new
amateurs due to the change in licensing requirements and other new FCC
policies to go with that change which occurred back in Feb of 2007, are
running new
Phil Williams wrote:
If you got the license, you have every right to be here as these they do.
It's one of my own points of view that you have to meet the licence
requirements as they stand when you apply.
So, Einstein or Hawkins would have had to take the same entry exam when
or if they
Dave Ackrill wrote:
Doing down people because they pass an exam and you do not think is as
rigorous as the one that you passed does not prove that they are less
able than you. In my opinion.
Dave (G0DJA)
I hope that the percentage of hams who look down on newcomers who passed
what they
I thought I'd run something up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes:
With the currently extended low sunspot cycle reducing the occurrence of 10
meter openings to near zero, there is little to offer new hams for radio
operating opportunities besides VHF FM. Many of the people who attend our
: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
I thought I'd run something up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes:
With the currently extended low sunspot cycle reducing the occurrence of 10
meter openings to near zero, there is little to offer new hams for radio
operating opportunities besides
On Tuesday 15 December 2009 12:55:14 Gary wrote:
I thought I'd run something up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes:
With the currently extended low sunspot cycle reducing the occurrence of 10
meter openings to near zero, there is little to offer new hams for radio
operating
://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
Digital_modes
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159
- Original Message -
From: Gary
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:55 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
I thought I'd run
At 11:55 AM 12/15/2009, you wrote in part:
So... Here is the idea. Would you be amenable to allowing Technician Class
licensees to operate digital modes in the Technician CW bands.
No.
.
Very 73 to all, Glenn (WB2LMV)
From: Gary grwes...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 12:55:14 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
I thought I'd run something up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes
ranks.
--- On Tue, 12/15/09, Glenn L. Roeser hillbillietr...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Glenn L. Roeser hillbillietr...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009, 10:48 AM
Gary
Why not? I used to do packet on 10 meters back about 1990 or so when I got my
Tech (Kam TNC with a Radio Shack HTX-100 at home. Whatever my club station had
at work.) Could stimulate more activity on 10 meters while waiting for the sun
spots to show up! Should also consider digital modes on
Why not encourage them to simply UPGRADE their license?? Instead handing
out more freebies?
73 WB4M
Buddy
- Original Message -
From: Gary grwes...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:55 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
I
Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digitalI totally agree with W2XJ
73 de WB4M
Buddy
- Original Message -
From: W2XJ
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
I think it is a bad idea
I would agree with Danny but think it would be better just limiting them to
5 watts (and avoiding the CW bands) . To really annoy people, I will point
out my long standing view that a license should not be required at all,
other than the completion of a three hour safety and regulation course.
At 03:33 PM 12/15/2009, you wrote:
Another problem is that the old guard who have an axe to grind against new
amateurs due to the change in licensing requirements and other new FCC
policies to go with that change which occurred back in Feb of 2007, are
running new amateurs off in droves.
I
dave.g0...@tiscali.co.uk
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009, 4:38 PM
Dan Hensley wrote:
I want to start with the fact that we remain in a very bad economy and people
I have to disagree with this one. The one reason we have for being able to
legally work on or even build our own equipment is that we supposedly have
proven at least some technical knowledge and ability in the electronics field.
Where does it stop? CBers cannot even tune up their own gear,
At 06:54 PM 12/15/2009, you wrote:
I would agree with Danny but think it would be better just limiting them to 5
watts (and avoiding the CW bands) . To really annoy people, I will point out
my long standing view that a license should not be required at all, other
than the completion of a
.
That goes to say I have a limitation. In the end, we're all just a bunch of
nerds who enjoy a strange hobby.
--- On Tue, 12/15/09, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net wrote:
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
To: digitalradio
.
Remember you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.
Now flame time.
73 Gary WB6BNE
- Original Message -
From: Gary
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:55 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
I
anyone's time.
--- On Tue, 12/15/09, Gary A. Hinton wb6...@cox.net wrote:
From: Gary A. Hinton wb6...@cox.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009, 7:27 PM
Hello
Gary
Gary wrote:
So... Here is the idea. Would you be amenable to allowing Technician
Class licensees to operate digital modes in the Technician CW bands
and do you think that would be of interest to new hams?
I do not think this is a good idea. In fact if it were up for comment at
the FCC I
In the end, we're all just a bunch of nerds who enjoy a strange hobby
An honest assessment.
or
in the end, we're all a bunch of strange nerds who enjoy a hobby
Personally, I would not have it anyway.
philw de ka1gmn
30 matches
Mail list logo
