Re: [digitalradio] 1000 Hz Olivia under USA new rules ?

2006-11-17 Thread KV9U
John, The direct printing could also refer to the older technologies of printing to a TD couldn't it? It would be possible to then relay that information without actually printing it out, such as on a sheet of paper with a teleprinter or on a monitor screen? Or would that become data? It is my

Re: [digitalradio] 1000 Hz Olivia under USA new rules ?

2006-11-17 Thread Mark Miller
Joe, I think your interpretation is correct, but there is much misinformation about this, mainly from http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/11/15/100/?nc=1 . 73, Mark N5RFX >My interpretation, which is as good as any at this point, is that >"telegraphy" is plain text to be read and interpret

RE: [digitalradio] 1000 Hz Olivia under USA new rules ?

2006-11-17 Thread Peter G. Viscarola
>I would expect that we will be able to get some help from ARRL HQ on >this since they could publish a list of modes along with their >classifications. That would help a great deal. > Don't know if you saw it or not, but the ARRL updated the "article" on their web site today specifically on thi

Re: [digitalradio] 1000 Hz Olivia under USA new rules ?

2006-11-17 Thread John B. Stephensen
ber 17, 2006 02:36 UTC Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 1000 Hz Olivia under USA new rules ? Joe, Your explanation may explain what the FCC meant when they wrote: "To accommodate the concern raised by ARRL, however, we will revise our rules to clarify that the 500 Hz limitation ap

Re: [digitalradio] 1000 Hz Olivia under USA new rules ?

2006-11-16 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Joe, that was my interpretation when I read it a few weeks ago. I think I will just continue to operate politely with Olivia 1000 Hz and wait until the FCC tells me I cannot do it. Then we would have a good test case - Original Message - From: "Joe Veldhuis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In m

Re: [digitalradio] 1000 Hz Olivia under USA new rules ?

2006-11-16 Thread KV9U
Joe, Your explanation may explain what the FCC meant when they wrote: "To accommodate the concern raised by ARRL, however, we will revise our rules to clarify that the 500 Hz limitation applies only to the emission types we are adding to the definition of data when transmitted on amateur service

Re: [digitalradio] 1000 Hz Olivia under USA new rules ?

2006-11-16 Thread Joe Veldhuis
In my opinion, this is absolutely WRONG. I have said this here before, it all comes down to what is considered "data". The new restrictions only cover content type "D", which is "Data, telemetry or telecommand". It does *NOT* include type "B", which is "telegraphy for automatic reception". It is a

Re: [digitalradio] 1000 Hz Olivia under USA new rules ?

2006-11-16 Thread KV9U
Andy, Yes, the new rules will not allow any modes to be used in the MF and HF CW/Data/RTTY portions of the bands unless they are 500 Hz or less in bandwidth. Many of the modes can greatly exceed 500 Hz, such as the wider submodes of the modes you noted. Other modes that will no longer be legal