At the moment it announces any for modes which are supported by DM780
(assuming RSID announcements are enabled).
If / when RSID really takes off I'll add a RSID toolbar so you can quickly
jump into RSID options, for example 'Ignore PSK31 RSID signals'.
Today - Sunday - I'm inside the logbook's
The difference here is that a "helper signal" has been added, same as
with SSTV, but which is only sent at the start of the
transmission.
That is essentially different from the raw, bare signal with no ID. A
new situation, to be fair.
73,
Jose, CO2JA
Simon (HB9DRV) escribió:
>
>
> FWIW SSTV
Charles Brabham wrote:
> This is interesting in light of all the claims by WinLink and ALE
> aficianados that that comprehensive signal-detection is 'impossible'.
Painting with an awfully wide brush, there. :-) You won't find most of
the ALE folks I run with saying it's impossible.
Just not imple
FWIW SSTV has been using VIS (slightly similar) for ~ 10 years or so, maybe
more.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Charles Brabham
This is interesting in light of all the claims by WinLink and ALE aficianados
that that comprehensive signal-
This is interesting in light of all the claims by WinLink and ALE aficianados
that that comprehensive signal-detection is 'impossible'.
73 DE Charles, N5PVL
- Original Message -
From: Ed Hekman
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 3:30 AM
Subject: [
On Monday I start a new SDR project - a full-blown SDR console. I envisage
users having at least a SDR receiver - even just a SoftRock (~60$) and with
this you have your 96kHz at a very low price.
DM780 will integrate with this console, fldigi will also be able to use it.
ETA for a provisional
Hello Scott,
At the present time, there is a sort of SELCAL called Call ID (RS ID
extension). However there is no protocol around it. It's just some
information about the Ham (Call sign, Locator...) which pops up on the
waterfall.
More about Call ID:
http://f6cte.free.fr/The_Call_ID_and_Prop_I
You don't know if an instantaneously "empty" spot on the waterfall is truly
empty until you send "QRL?" and receive no response, or monitor it long
enough to have heard both sides of a QSO if one were in progress.
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [
Also, would it not be beneficial to have something like this implemented in
the the unattended Pactor stations.
A physical convergence layer for all.
73
philw de ka1gmn
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:33 AM, aa777888athotmaildotcom <
aa777...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> You know what's really excitin
- Original Message -
From: "aa777888athotmaildotcom"
>
> Thanks again, Simon!
>
It's really Patrick and the other code developers you must thank :)
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
I think it'll take up to a year - then we'll be rocking.
Also when we use SDR more there will be a big improvement.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Tony
I think we're making progress with RSID Dave, it's just slow to catch on.
Have a look
>I have yet to receive an RSID burst on any digital CQ.
> 73 de Dave, NF2G
I think we're making progress with RSID Dave, it's just slow to catch on. Have
a look at the RSID video in the file section of this reflector.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/files/ see RSID_HRD.WMV
Tony -K2
12 matches
Mail list logo
