RE: [digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick.

2007-02-18 Thread Peter G. Viscarola
Applications using DDE run correctly under Vista, as do the development tools used to produce such applications. Thus Microsoft is no longer supporting DDE is demonstrably false. I am SO not an application programmer, and no disrespect intended for the Master, but VB.NET (since the 2002

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick.

2007-02-18 Thread Simon Brown
- Original Message - From: Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rather than weld ourselves to one transport mechanism (again), perhaps we should only define message semantics. Being able to choose in-memory, network, or even serial port transports would provide useful flexibility. I

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick.

2007-02-18 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
Yes, indeed, those layers need to be designed separately. If it works over TCP and uses only one connection, it will work over serial, and if it uses more than one connection then some means of mux for the serial would be necessary. Deciding the goals and the various bindingd would certainly

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick.

2007-02-18 Thread Dave AA6YQ
: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick. Applications using DDE run correctly under Vista, as do the development tools used to produce such applications. Thus Microsoft is no longer supporting DDE is demonstrably false. I am SO not an application programmer, and no disrespect intended for the Master

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick.

2007-02-18 Thread Dave AA6YQ
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Simon Brown Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 11:35 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick. - Original Message - From: Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rather than weld ourselves

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick.

2007-02-18 Thread Dave AA6YQ
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Leigh L Klotz, Jr. Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 12:51 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick. Yes, indeed, those layers need to be designed separately. If it works over TCP and uses only one connection, it will work

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick.

2007-02-18 Thread Simon Brown
- Original Message - From: cesco12342000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] TCP is complicated ! Its easy to build a client (maybe), its more complicated to build a server, and it's hard to build a server which reliably can accept and handle multiple connections on one port ! I will make my

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick.

2007-02-18 Thread Simon Brown
- Original Message - From: Frank Brickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] This encapsulates perfectly and beautifully the fundamental flaw in the Windows OS basic design. I do not agree - a competent programmer can easily write good networking software under Windows, even when using VISTA!

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick.

2007-02-17 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
Dave, The XDIF.org site has a bboard for discussing other items, such as propagation. Rein has a wiki page about the protocol. Yes, I would be pleased to finish the XML enumerations. I will contact you about checking the diffs between the ones I ddi and the 2.1.9 spec so we can get back in

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick.

2007-02-17 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
TCP is good enough. Windows and Linux make it efficient on the box, and you always have the option to use named pipes or AF_UNIX sockets to make it even shorter. X windows works this way and it is plenty fast enough. Unless you're doing a full SDR data stream though there's no need for