Re: [PATCH] qf: Make qf_pull -f forcibly clean

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 04:55:26PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 04:08:41PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > qf_checkout implies that you need to have that baseline > > on your local repository, what it is not good for a distributed > > maintenance. > > > > Let's make qf

Re: [Intel-gfx] [DIM PATCH 3/3] dim: loosen some drm-intel checkpatch rules

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 01:30:10PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > Set max line length to 100. I don't want to silence the LONG_LINE > warning altogether, and I'd still prefer to keep lines under 80 > characters, but I also don't want to see all the noise, and nor do I > want to see silly code trying

Re: [DIM PATCH 2/3] dim: add checkpatch profiles to allow different checkpatch options

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 01:30:09PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > To reduce noise on CI checkpatch reports, we want to silence some > checkpatch warnings. Different branches may end up having different > rules, and users may want to get unfiltered results, so introduce > checkpatch profiles. Add some

[DIM PATCH 1/3] dim: cleanup checkpatch_commit

Remove some old cruft. Pass checkpatch parameters via a variable. No functional changes. Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Rodrigo Vivi Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula --- dim | 7

[DIM PATCH 3/3] dim: loosen some drm-intel checkpatch rules

Set max line length to 100. I don't want to silence the LONG_LINE warning altogether, and I'd still prefer to keep lines under 80 characters, but I also don't want to see all the noise, and nor do I want to see silly code trying to arbitrarily squeeze under 80 when it doesn't make sense. 100 is a