On 7/16/2012 1:59 AM, Tom Metro wrote:
But I'm assuming that EncFS isn't doing anything to assist the syncing
of partial files, so your minimum transfer is a full file.
Like I said, I've been experimenting, and I've found how to make this
work better with rsync/unison. Hooray for reading the
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> Tom Metro wrote:
>> So you're syncing the encrypted files in the source directory. That
>> makes a lot more sense than using an encryption technology that just
>> creates an opaque image file.
>
> I use whole-disk, and file containers, and encfs, all for different
> purp
On 7/16/2012 8:20 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
I suggested that to the rsync folks some years ago, and they said they
didn't like the idea.
I'm not surprised. rsync is a unilateral copy tool: make target look
exactly like source. An out of band index is superfluous to this.
> Do you know a
On 7/16/2012 1:59 AM, Tom Metro wrote:
So you're syncing the encrypted files in the source directory. That
makes a lot more sense than using an encryption technology that just
creates an opaque image file.
Correct, at least for my needs. There is a 1:1 correspondence between
native file syste
> From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
> bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of Tom Metro
>
> According to:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encfs
>
> Two directories are involved in mounting an EncFS filesystem: the
> source directory, and the mountpoint. E
Richard Pieri wrote:
> I just started experimenting with client-side EncFS and running rsync or
> unison on the underlying native file system. ... Sync underneath EncFS
> compares encrypted file to encrypted file...
According to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encfs
Two directories are involved i
