On 07/10/2012 04:14 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
On 7/10/2012 2:53 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
I don't know LDAP that well so I am looking for an LDAP solution that
will permit certain users to use certain systems.
I use PAM.
The way I do it is to create an LDAP group for each role. Each
limited
On 07/10/2012 07:21 PM, Guy Gold wrote:
Most of you probably heard this one.
Mozilla does the unthinkable
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/mozilla-does-the-unthinkable/3719
___
Yes. I prefer Thunderbird to other clients, but I have not
On 07/10/2012 10:56 AM, Jack Coats wrote:
I have only used USB2, but if I had esata available, I think it would
be worth using. In my situation, speed isn't always needed,
especially since all but local backups are over a G wifi network.
I use eSATA removable drives. Last year I bought a 1.5TB
And Siri is losing badly to Google Now in most head to head
comparisons. People such as Wozniak seem to think that Apple
compromised quality by over-accentuating commercial aspects of Siri.
A fundamentally flawed comparison. Google Now is a search
application, and search is the thing that
On 7/11/2012 7:31 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
I'm leaning toward using LDAP. LDAP will be at a corporate level (not
IBM but Algorithmics). But, I don't have that many servers so I can
replicate my changes to each of the servers . Back on testdrive we used
PAM and it worked well except for one
On 07/11/2012 11:39 AM, Richard Pieri wrote:
On 7/11/2012 7:31 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
I'm leaning toward using LDAP. LDAP will be at a corporate level (not
IBM but Algorithmics). But, I don't have that many servers so I can
replicate my changes to each of the servers . Back on testdrive we
When: July 18, 2012 7PM (6:30PM for QA)
Topic: The Virtual Desktop
Moderator:Jerry Feldman
Location: MIT Building E51, Room 315
Summary
Using Virtual Machines as end-user desktops
Abstract
Today's desktop and laptop computers mostly support virtualization
with very good
On 7/11/2012 12:13 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
The issue is we must convert from NIS, and LDAP is the only solution and
it is imposed on me. Eventually we will move to a different
authentication as we get more integrated.
So what? It's trading one directory service for another. You still get
On 7/11/2012 9:52 AM, Stephen Ronan wrote:
One reason I asked... my impression (pls correct me if I'm wrong) is
that you think that iPad's dominant position in 10 tablets is quite
secure.
I do. I don't think that Jellybean is going to unseat iPad in that
space for one simple reason: iOS has
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Richard Pieri richard.pi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/11/2012 9:52 AM, Stephen Ronan wrote:
One reason I asked... my impression (pls correct me if I'm wrong) is
that you think that iPad's dominant position in 10 tablets is quite
secure.
I do. I don't think
On 07/11/2012 12:54 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
On 7/11/2012 9:52 AM, Stephen Ronan wrote:
One reason I asked... my impression (pls correct me if I'm wrong) is
that you think that iPad's dominant position in 10 tablets is quite
secure.
I do. I don't think that Jellybean is going to unseat iPad
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org wrote:
On 07/11/2012 12:34 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
On 7/11/2012 12:13 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
The issue is we must convert from NIS, and LDAP is the only solution and
it is imposed on me. Eventually we will move to a different
On 07/11/2012 02:57 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
That sounds like a lot of extra latency for looking up simple things
(i.e UID - username mappings i.e. ls -l). I don't know if local
caching is included the standard LDAP/NSS setup, but I would check
myself to be sure.
Good Luck,
Bill Bogstad
On 07/11/2012 02:57 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org wrote:
On 07/11/2012 12:34 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
On 7/11/2012 12:13 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
The issue is we must convert from NIS, and LDAP is the only solution and
it is imposed on me.
On 07/11/2012 03:09 PM, Nuno Sucena Almeida wrote:
On 07/11/2012 02:57 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
That sounds like a lot of extra latency for looking up simple things
(i.e UID - username mappings i.e. ls -l). I don't know if local
caching is included the standard LDAP/NSS setup, but I would
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 02:53:11PM -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
Our company's servers are moving from the Boston facility to IBM's
facilities, and we will have to replace NIS with LDAP. We don't get to
vote, NIS will be replaced.
You sound sad about this. You probably shouldn't. NIS is dead;
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:07:30PM -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
Will I have to change uids and gids This is an issue for our IT people.
If they wil create a separate OU or LDAP group for us, great. If they
want to merge is in, that creates a few more issues
If we get merged in, then I will also
On 7/11/2012 1:52 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
Now if we are just talking about JB, I might agree. But longer term
(1-2 years), Android can add a lot of functionality while I don't see
Apple ever being the price leader.
Android already does far more than iOS can. Galaxy Tab 10 is
technically
18 matches
Mail list logo
